*Corresponding author:
Danielle Baghernejad, Intermedix, Nashville TN 37219, Tennessee, USAReceived: September 16, 2017; Published: October 12, 2017
DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2017.01.000431
To view the Full Article Peer-reviewed Article PDF
In this paper we explore variable importance within tree-based modeling, discussing its strengths and weaknesses with regard to medical inference and action ability. While variable importance is useful in understanding how strongly a variable influences a tree, it does not convey how variables relate to different classes of the target variable. Given that in the medical setting, both prediction and inference are important for successful machine learning, a new measure capturing variable importance with regards to classes is essential. A measure calculated from the paths of training instances through the tree is defined, and initial performance on benchmark datasets is explored.
Keywords : Machine learning; Tree-based modeling; Decision trees; Variable importance; Class Variable Importance
Abbreviations : CART: Classification and Regression Trees; CVI: Class Variable Importance; ET: Extra Trees; RF: Random Forests; GBT: Gradient Boosted Trees; AUC: Area under the Curve; ROC: Receiver Operating Characteristic
Abstract| Introduction| Generating a Decision Tree| Interpreting a Tree| Class Variable Importance| Performance on Benchmark Data| Conclusion| Acknowledgement| References|
International Association of Landscape Archaeology, Czech Glass Society, Czech Republic
Department of Chemistry, Semenov Institute of Chemical Physics, USSR Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
Pharmaco-kinetics, dynamics and Drug Metabolism, Touro College of Pharmacy, USA
Professor of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Associate Professor at Department of Breast and Thyorid Surgey, Chongqing General Hospital, China