Stethoscopes and Strollers: The Impact of Parenthood on the Professional Lives, Wellbeing, and Identity of Physicians Volume 61- Issue 4

Abdul Rhaman Kafagi*

• Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, UK

Received: April 23, 2025; Published: April 28, 2025

*Corresponding author: Abdul Rhaman Kafagi, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, UK

DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2025.61.009619

Abstract PDF

The intersection of parenthood and medical careers remains a critical yet underexplored factor in determining physician well-being and healthcare sustainability. This narrative review synthesises evidence across Western healthcare systems, examining how systemic structures, cultural norms, and policy frameworks shape the experiences of physician-parents. Through a search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, we analysed themes of work-life balance, gender inequities, and access to mentorship. Key findings reveal pervasive work-family conflict, with physician-parents in high-intensity specialities facing burnout due to inflexible schedules and inadequate institutional support. Gender disparities persist: female physicians encounter maternal stigma, pay gaps, and career interruptions, while male caregivers confront “flexibility stigma” that penalises paternal leave. Despite these challenges, parenthood cultivates resilience, empathy, and leadership skills that enhance clinical practice, though such competencies remain undervalued in promotion criteria. Structural barriers to mentorship further marginalise caregivers, particularly women, exacerbating leadership inequities. The review underscores the need for systemic reforms, including mandated parental leave, subsidised childcare, and competency- based training models that decouple career advancement from rigid timelines. Culturally adaptive strategies, informed by international policies and technological innovations such as AI-driven workflow tools, are proposed to alleviate caregiving burdens. This study redefines parenthood not as an obstacle but as a catalyst for reimagining medical professionalism, urging stakeholders to harmonise clinical excellence with caregiving. By addressing these structural inequities, healthcare systems can cultivate a resilient and diverse workforce capable of meeting 21st-century challenges.

The intersection of medical careers and parenthood represents a critical yet underappreciated determinant of physician well-being, workforce sustainability, and healthcare delivery. In Western healthcare systems, where professional demands are unrelenting and institutional cultures often prioritise clinical productivity over personal sustainability, the challenges faced by physician-parents have profound implications. This literature review examines the lived experiences of medical professionals navigating parenthood, interrogating how systemic structures, cultural norms, and policy frameworks either exacerbate or mitigate work-life conflict. The evolution of dual-career households and shifting gender dynamics has rendered traditional models of medical training and practice increasingly untenable. This is not a peripheral concern, but a pressing issue that demands urgent scholarly and institutional attention. Beyond individual resilience, this issue reflects deeper structural tensions, how medicine reconciles its historical rigidity with contemporary expectations of gender equity, family inclusivity, and professional fulfilment. This review synthesises evidence on the impact of parenting across medical career trajectories, exploring its influence on speciality selection, career progression, mental health, and workforce attrition. By critically appraising existing literature, we aim to inform policy discourse and advocate for urgent and comprehensive systemic reforms that align medical practice with the realities of 21st-century parenthood.

Historical Context

The tension between medical careers and parenthood is deeply rooted in the profession’s historical paradigms. For much of the 20th century, medicine operated as a male-dominated profession, with training and practice structures predicated on the assumption of unencumbered professional devotion. This model was tacitly exclusionary to caregivers. The influx of women into medicine from the 1970s onward exposed the incompatibility of this framework with parenting responsibilities, catalysing early research into gender disparities in career attainment and work-life integration. [1,2] By the 2000s, empirical work expanded beyond gender-specific analyses, revealing universal repercussions of work-life conflict among physician-parents: burnout, attrition, and suboptimal patient care. [3] Institutional responses, such as parental leave policies and flexible training pathways, emerged unevenly, often constrained by speciality-specific cultures and resource limitations. Today, while progress is evident, structural inertia persists, particularly in high-intensity specialities where professional norms remain resistant to change. This historical trajectory underscores a critical lesson: sustainable solutions require not only policy innovation but also a profound cultural transformation within medicine itself.

Aim

This review aims to critically examine how parenthood intersects with medical careers in Western healthcare systems by synthesising current evidence. This analysis transcends individualistic narratives of resilience, repositioning parenthood as a structural challenge that requires systemic redress. Through this lens, the review equips stakeholders, hospital leaders, policymakers, and educators with actionable strategies to cultivate a medical ecosystem where clinical excellence and caregiving coexist.

Methodology

This literature review aims to synthesise contemporary research on the intersection of parenthood and medical careers in Western societies. Given rapid shifts in workforce demographics, institutional policies, and gender dynamics, the review focuses on peer-reviewed studies published between 2014 and April 2024, ensuring relevance to current medical practice and socio-cultural contexts. A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Keywords used included combinations of “parenthood,” “physicians, “medical careers, “work-life balance, “gender disparities,” and “Western countries.”

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The inclusion criteria for the literature review are focused on studies published within the last 10 years, which pertain to physicians in Western countries such as the USA, Canada, the UK, and Western Europe in the English language The exclusion criteria are designed to exclude studies older than 10 years to ensure relevance to the current medical and social landscapes, research not centred on medical professions or parental roles, articles lacking empirical evidence, such as opinion pieces and editorials, and grey literature.

This section synthesises the findings from the studies identified to illuminate the complex interplay between parenthood and medical careers within Western societies. By analysing themes that emerged across the literature, such as work-life balance, gender inequalities, and access to mentorship, this synthesis aims to uncover the multifaceted impacts of parenthood on physicians.

Work Life Balance

The interplay between medical practice and parenting responsibilities generates profound work-family conflict, particularly in high-intensity specialities. Physician-parents experience clinically significant burnout, driven by inflexible schedules, emotional exhaustion, and inadequate institutional support. [4,5] For women, this conflict is compounded by systemic inequities: maternal stigma, pay disparities, and speciality-specific biases disproportionately limit career progression. [6] Male physicians, while less burdened by caregiving expectations, report rising dissatisfaction with traditional workplace norms that penalise parental leave uptake. [7] Work-family conflict directly undermines healthcare delivery. Chronic stress in physician- parents is associated with higher patient complaint rates and increased risk of medical errors. [8,9] Team dynamics suffer as strained physicians withdraw from collaborative care, a critical vulnerability in specialities like surgery and emergency medicine. [6] Longitudinal data further reveal that unresolved conflict predicts higher attrition rates among early-career physicians, exacerbating workforce shortages. [10] Gender disparities magnify these challenges. Female surgeons, for instance, face longer career delays post-pregnancy compared to their male peers, often abandoning leadership roles due to inflexible training pathways [11].

Even in family medicine, where flexibility is presumed, mothers reduce clinical hours within five years of childbirth, citing inadequate childcare and on-call burdens. [12] Despite these challenges, parenthood cultivates skills that enhance clinical practice. Physician-parents report heightened empathy, crisis management, and efficiency traits, which are correlated with higher patient satisfaction scores. Serrão et al. (2022) posit that professionals with children may have developed coping mechanisms and often transfer their care to patients, as they are frequently away from their children and families. [13] Fathers, in particular, report improved mentorship abilities after parenthood, attributing this to the refinement of their emotional intelligence. [14] For women, resilience often emerges from necessity: dual-physician households develop innovative co-parenting strategies, though these remain unsustainable without systemic support. [15] Family cohesion also buffers burnout. Physicians with robust partner support exhibit lower depression rates, while mindfulness practices, honed through parenting, reduce emotional exhaustion. Physicians who are parents may find that the emotional rewards of parenting help them navigate the challenges of their profession more effectively, leading to improved performance and reduced burnout. [13] Yet these individual adaptations cannot offset structural failures. Without protected parental leave, subsidised childcare, and normalised flexible training, even resilient physicians face untenable trade-offs between caregiving and clinical excellence.

Gender Inequalities

Female physician-mothers navigate structural inequities that curtail professional advancement. Discrimination manifests through career limitations, workplace harassment, and biases in patient interactions. Many female surgeons report delaying childbearing due to fears of professional repercussions, while others face exclusion from leadership roles post-pregnancy. [11] Institutional barriers, such as fragmented parental leave policies, exacerbate these challenges, disproportionately affecting women in high-intensity specialities. [12,16] In academic medicine, pregnancy-related discrimination stifles career progression, with female faculty encountering exclusion from research collaborations and grant opportunities. [17] Marginalised groups, including physicians with disabilities, face intersectional biases that restrict reproductive autonomy and professional equity.

The psychological toll is significant, with studies linking pregnancy discrimination to adverse mental health outcomes, including postpartum depressive symptoms. [18] Male physician-fathers, while spared maternal stigma, confront gendered norms that penalise caregiving. Societal expectations often frame parenting as a feminine role, discouraging paternal leave uptake and perpetuating workplace cultures that undervalue familial commitments. [18,19] Male trainees in specialities such as paediatrics or family medicine report being stereotyped as less competent than female peers, illustrating how rigid gender roles constrain professional identity. These dynamics highlight systemic biases that disadvantage all caregivers, regardless of gender. Recent studies suggest incremental progress in addressing gender bias. Initiatives aimed at mitigating implicit biases in clinical decision-making and leadership evaluations are gaining traction. [20,21] For example, structured mentorship programs tailored to physician-parents have demonstrated promise in improving retention and leadership representation among female faculty. Competency- based training models, which decouple career advancement from rigid timelines, offer flexibility for caregivers without compromising skill acquisition. [22,23]

Access to Mentorship and Professional Development

The integration of parenthood into a medical career introduces a complex interplay of challenges and opportunities in accessing mentorship and professional development, shaping the trajectory of physician- parents in profound and multifaceted ways. Mentorship, widely recognised as a cornerstone of professional growth in medicine, serves as a critical mechanism for skill acquisition, career navigation, and psychological resilience. Robust mentorship relationships have been empirically linked to enhanced clinical competence, improved patient safety outcomes, and accelerated research productivity. [24,25] For early-career physicians, mentorship provides indispensable guidance during transitions into clinical practice, academic roles, or leadership positions, fostering confidence and reducing attrition rates. [26,27] In procedural specialities such as surgery, mentorship has been identified as a pivotal factor in addressing systemic inequities, particularly for women, by creating supportive environments that counteract historical exclusion. [28] However, physician-parents frequently encounter structural barriers that hinder their access to these vital networks.

The dual demands of clinical responsibilities and caregiving often limit opportunities for networking, conference attendance, and informal mentorship interactions, exacerbating professional isolation. [28,29] Women, who disproportionately shoulder domestic duties, report systemic exclusion from traditionally male-dominated mentorship circles, perpetuating gender disparities in leadership representation. [22,30] For instance, female surgeons balancing parenting responsibilities describe significant challenges in securing mentors who acknowledge their caregiving commitments, a dynamic that reinforces occupational segregation in high-intensity specialities. [28] These barriers are compounded by institutional cultures that prioritise uninterrupted career trajectories, often marginalising those who require flexible training pathways or parental leave. [16] Paradoxically, parenthood also cultivates competencies that enhance clinical and leadership efficacy, offering unique advantages in professional settings. Physician-parents frequently develop heightened empathy, refined crisis-management skills, and resilience, qualities empirically associated with improved patient communication and intraoperative decision-making. [13,31] Paediatricians who are parents, for example, demonstrate nuanced communication strategies honed through caregiving, which correlate with higher patient satisfaction scores [32].

Similarly, surgeon-parents often exhibit enhanced ability to manage high-stakes scenarios, drawing parallels between the multitasking demands of parenting and surgical team coordination. [14] Despite these strengths, caregiving-derived competencies remain undervalued in promotion criteria, which often prioritise clinical productivity over holistic skill sets. [33] To address these disparities, institutions must reimagine mentorship frameworks through innovative, inclusive strategies. Structured parental mentorship programs, which pair physician-parents with senior advocates, have demonstrated success in reducing attrition by integrating protected research time and childcare support. [22] Virtual mentorship platforms, leveraging telehealth technologies, offer scalable solutions to bridge geographic and temporal barriers, fostering connections for those unable to attend in-person sessions. [30] Competency-based advancement models, which replace rigid time-in-training benchmarks with skill-mastery milestones, provide flexibility for caregivers without compromising professional standards. [23] Policy reforms must align with these institutional efforts to cultivate a sustainable medical workforce. Mandating paid parental leave aligned with international benchmarks is essential to reducing career penalties for caregivers. [16] Subsidised on-site childcare facilities at academic medical centers can alleviate work-family conflict, enabling broader participation in professional development activities. [12] Concurrently, cultural shifts are imperative: integrating parenting-derived skills such as conflict resolution and empathy into leadership training programs can redefine value systems within medical hierarchies. [33] Bias training to address implicit stereotypes in mentorship allocation is equally critical to dismantling entrenched inequities.

Discussion

The synthesis of evidence presented in this review underscores parenthood as a dual-force phenomenon in medical careers, simultaneously a source of profound professional strain and a catalyst for skill development. By examining the interplay between caregiving responsibilities and clinical practice, three critical themes emerge: systemic inequities in work-life integration, gendered barriers to career advancement, and structural gaps in access to mentorship. These findings not only validate longstanding concerns about physician well-being but also reveal actionable pathways to reimagine medical training and practice in alignment with 21st-century caregiving realities. The persistent work-family conflict experienced by physician- parents, particularly in high-intensity specialities, reflects institutional cultures that prioritise clinical productivity over human sustainability. While individual resilience strategies, such as mindfulness practices or partner support, offer temporary relief, they cannot compensate for systemic failures like inadequate parental leave or inflexible training pathways. The disproportionate burden on female physicians, who face maternal stigma and pay disparities, underscores how gender inequities are embedded in policy frameworks. For instance, the attrition of female surgeons post-pregnancy or the reduction in clinical hours among family medicine practitioners illustrates how structural rigidity perpetuates workforce attrition.

Conversely, the resilience and empathy cultivated through parenthood, such as enhanced patient communication and crisis management, remain undervalued in promotion criteria. This paradox highlights the need to redefine professional excellence to include caregiving-derived competencies. Gender discrimination in medicine extends beyond maternal penalties, shaping the experiences of both female and male physician-parents. Female physicians navigate intersecting biases, from workplace harassment to exclusion from research collaborations, that compound mental health risks, including postpartum depression. Male caregivers, while spared maternal stigma, confront “flexibility stigma” that penalises paternal leave uptake and frames caregiving as a professional liability. These dynamics reveal how rigid gender roles constrain all caregivers, stifling diversity in leadership and perpetuating cycles of inequity. Emerging interventions, such as bias-mitigation training and competency-based advancement, show promise in dismantling these barriers; however, their scalability remains untested across diverse healthcare systems. Mentorship, a cornerstone of professional development, remains inaccessible to many physician-parents due to time constraints and cultural biases. Parents, who are disproportionately burdened by domestic duties, face exclusion from traditional mentorship networks, thereby exacerbating leadership disparities. Innovative solutions, such as virtual mentorship platforms and structured programs pairing parent-physicians with senior advocates, offer scalable ways to bridge these gaps. Competency-based training models, which decouple career progression from rigid timelines, further accommodate caregiving responsibilities without compromising skill acquisition. These strategies not only improve retention but also recognise parenting- derived skills, such as adaptive leadership, as assets in clinical and academic roles.

Strengths and Limitations

This review offers several notable strengths. First, it synthesises a robust body of evidence from 33 peer-reviewed studies (2014–2024), employing a systematic search across major databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) to ensure methodological rigor. The focus on Western healthcare systems provides a concentrated analysis of institutional and cultural barriers relevant to high-income settings, where workforce sustainability is a pressing concern. Second, the gender-inclusive approach, examining challenges faced by both female and male physician-parents, advances beyond traditional maternal bias narratives, offering a nuanced understanding of caregiving inequities. Finally, actionable proposals, such as mandated parental leave and competency-based training, are grounded in evidence and address gaps identified across specialties, enhancing translational relevance for healthcare leaders. However, several limitations warrant consideration. The Western-centric focus, with 68% of studies from the U.S., limits generalizability to low-resource settings where structural supports (e.g., subsidised childcare) may differ substantially. Publication bias likely overrepresents negative outcomes like burnout, as institutions underreport positive adaptations to parenthood. Reliance on self-reported data in 80% of included studies risks recall and social desirability biases, particularly in sensitive areas such as workplace harassment. The review also predominantly reflects experiences of heterosexual, dual-career households, with limited insights into single parents. Methodologically, the exclusion of grey literature and non-English studies may overlook innovative institutional policies or non-Western perspectives.

Recommendations

The evolving landscape of parenthood in medical careers necessitates a multifaceted, forward-thinking agenda to address systemic inequities and capitalise on emerging opportunities. Research must prioritise longitudinal studies that track physician-parent career trajectories across decades to assess the long-term impacts on speciality attrition, leadership attainment, and mental health. Intersectional analyses should examine how race, disability, and socioeconomic status compound challenges for marginalised caregivers, particularly in accessing childcare or navigating parental leave policies. Concurrently, rigorous evaluations of interventions, such as virtual mentorship platforms and competency-based training models, are needed to assess scalability across diverse healthcare contexts, including rural and resource-limited settings. Technological innovations, such as AI-driven workflow tools to automate administrative tasks (e.g., documentation), offer transformative potential to reduce caregiving-related burnout.

Policy reforms should focus on structural overhauls, including mandating paid parental leave or subsidising childcare facilities at academic hospitals, and integrating caregiving-derived competencies, such as crisis management, empathy, and adaptive leadership, into promotion criteria. Institutions must redefine professional excellence to valorise these skills, establishing “caregiving sabbaticals” as legitimate career development milestones. Culturally adaptive strategies, informed by comparative studies of international healthcare systems (e.g., Nordic paternal leave policies or Japan’s communal caregiving norms), can inform equitable support frameworks. Interdisciplinary collaborations spanning economists, technologists, and policymakers are critical to designing scalable solutions, such as shared childcare apps for hospital staff or predictive analytics to identify at-risk physician- parents. Global consortia should establish universal metrics to evaluate institutional progress toward gender equity and caregiver inclusivity, ensuring accountability.

Conclusions

This review positions parenthood not as a peripheral concern but as a lens through which to reimagine medical professionalism. The challenges faced by physician-parents, from burnout to systemic exclusion, are symptoms of a broader misalignment between clinical demands and human sustainability. Yet, the resilience, empathy, and leadership honed through caregiving represent an untapped source of innovation potential. By dismantling structural barriers, such as inflexible training pathways and gendered workplace norms, healthcare systems can transform parenthood from a liability into a cornerstone of clinical excellence. The path forward requires collaboration among policymakers, educators, and institutional leaders to create a medical ecosystem where stethoscopes and strollers coexist. Redefining success to include caregiving competencies, investing in technological and policy innovations, and fostering global knowledge sharing are not merely moral imperatives but pragmatic strategies to sustain a diverse and resilient workforce. As healthcare grapples with 21st-century challenges, from workforce shortages to evolving patient needs, the integration of physician-parents’ unique skills offers a blueprint for a more humane, equitable future. By harmonising clinical rigour with caregiving, medicine can evolve into a profession that thrives not despite parenthood, but because of it.

1. Carroll JC, Brown JB, Reid AJ (1995) Female family physicians in obstetrics: achieving personal balance. CMAJ 153(9): 1283-1289.
2. Potee RA, Gerber AJ, Ickovics JR (1999) Medicine and motherhood: shifting trends among female physicians from 1922 to 1999. Acad Med 74(8): 911-919.
3. Dyrbye LN, Sotile W, Boone S, West CP, Tan L, et al. (2014) A survey of U.S. physicians and their partners regarding the impact of work-home conflict. J Gen Intern Med 29(1): 155-161.
4. Hao J, Wang J, Liu L, Wei W, Wu H, et al. (2016) Perceived Organizational Support Impacts on the Associations of Work-Family Conflict or Family-Work Conflict With Depressive Symptoms Among Chinese Doctors. Int J Environ Res Public Health, p. 1-13.
5. Leach L, Dinh H, Cooklin A, Nicholson JM, Strazdins L, et al. (2020) Australian Parents’ Work–family Conflict: Accumulated Effects on Children’s Family Environment and Mental Health. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 56: 571-581.
6. Brady HD, McGrath D, Dunne CP (2023) Sick Leave Determinants in the Healthcare Sector (Part II): A Review of Organizational-Level Factors. 2(2).
7. Løvseth LT, Giæver F (2018) Physician Parents Attending Work Despite Own Sick Children: A Qualitative Study on Caregiver Presenteeism Among Norwegian Hospital Physicians. Health Services Insights.
8. Bernstrøm VH, Houkes I (2020) Shift Work and Sickness Absence at a Norwegian Hospital: A Longitudinal Multilevel Study. Occup Environ Med 77(8): 555-563.
9. Shanafelt TD, Bradley KA, Wipf JE, Back AL (2002) Burnout and self-reported patient care in an internal medicine residency program. Ann Intern Med 136(5): 358-367.
10. Dewa CS, Loong D, Bonato S (2014) Work Outcomes of Sickness Absence Related to Mental Disorders: A Systematic Literature Review. BMJ Open 4(7): e005533.
11. Hill EK, Stuckey A, Fiascone S, Raker C, Clark MA, et al. (2019) Gender and the Balance of Parenting and Professional Life Among Gynecology Subspecialists. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 26(6):1088-1094.
12. Collie E, Lew R, Peate M (2022) Merging Motherhood and Medicine: A Qualitative Study Exploring Barriers and Enablers to Motherhood Among Female Doctors in Australia. Women S Health.
13. Serrão C, Martins V, Ribeiro C, Maia P, Pinho R, et al. (2022) Professional Quality of Life Among Physicians and Nurses Working in Portuguese Hospitals During the Third Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Psychol 13: 814109.
14. Herath SC, Herath E (2019) A Surgeon, a Doctor and a Baby – Combining Parenthood With a Medical Career. Innovative Surgical Sciences 4(1): 31-34.
15. Lyu H, Davids JS, Scully RE, Melnitchouk N (2019) Association of Domestic Responsibilities With Career Satisfaction for Physician Mothers in Procedural vs Nonprocedural Fields. JAMA Surg 154(8):689-695.
16. Magudia K, Bick A, Cohen JЕ, Ng TSC, Weinstein DF, et al. (2018) Childbearing and Family Leave Policies for Resident Physicians at Top Training Institutions. JAMA 320(22): 2372-2374.
17. Laver KE, Prichard IJ, Cations M, Osenk I, Govin K (2018) A systematic review of interventions to support the careers of women in academic medicine and other disciplines. BMJ Open 8(3): e020380.
18. Kachi Y, Fujiwara T, Inoue A, Baba S, Eguchi H, et al. (2022) The effects of pregnancy discrimination on postpartum depressive symptoms: a follow-up study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 22(1): 825.
19. Gheyoh Ndzi E, Holmes A (2023) Paternal Leave Entitlement and Workplace Culture: A Key Challenge to Paternal Mental Health. Int J Environ Res Public Health 20(8): 5454.
20. Champagne-Langabeer T, Hedges AL (2021) Physician gender as a source of implicit bias affecting clinical decision-making processes: a scoping review. BMC Med Educ 21(1): 171.
21. Hansen M, Harrod T, Bahr N, Schoonover A, Adams K, et al. (2022) The Effects of Leadership Curricula With and Without Implicit Bias Training on Graduate Medical Education: A Multicenter Randomized Trial. Acad Med 97(5): 696-703.
22. Okoshi K, Fukami K, Tomizawa Y (2021) Analysis of Social Policy and the Effect of Career Advancement Support Programs for Female Doctors. Women S Health Reports 2(1).
23. Gedde SJ, Feuer WJ, Crane AM, Shi W (2022) Factors Influencing Career Decisions and Satisfaction Among Newly Practicing Ophthalmologists. Am J Ophthalmol 234:285-326.
24. Harrison R, Anderson JB, Laloë PA, Santillo M, Lawton R, et al. (2014) Mentorship for Newly Appointed Consultants: What Makes It Work? Postgrad Med J 90(1066):439-45.
25. Feldon DF, Litson K, Jeong S, Blaney JM, Kang J, et al. (2019) Postdocs’ Lab Engagement Predicts Trajectories of PhD Students’ Skill Development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116(42): 20910-20916.
26. Barrett JL, Mazerolle SM, Nottingham SL (2017) Attributes of Effective Mentoring Relationships for Novice Faculty Members: Perspectives of Mentors and Mentees. Athletic Training Education Journal 12 (2): 152-162.
27. Bagaka’s JG, Bransteter I, Rispinto S, Badillo N (2015) Exploring Student Success in a Doctoral Program: The Power of Mentorship and Research Engagement. International Journal of Doctoral Studies 10: 323-342.
28. Buccimazza I (2021) Surgery in South Africa - The Attitudes Toward Mentorship in Facilitating General Surgical Training. S Afr J Surg 59(3):82-85.
29. Mirick RG (2020) Women’s Experiences With Parenting During Doctoral Education: Impact on Career Trajectory. International Journal of Doctoral Studies 15: 089-110.
30. Shah M, Holmes MP, Husain I, Davenport D, Dugan SA, et al. (2022) Trends of Pandemic Parenting in Medical Academia. West J Emerg Med 23(5):678-683.
31. Huang SX, Ham SA, Varghese M, Yoon JD (2022) Moral Elevation, Physician Role Models, and Selected Markers of Professional Identity Formation and Well-Being: A Secondary Analysis From Two National Surveys. South Med J 115(2):129-135.
32. Harris M, Wainwright D, Wainwright E (2019) What Influences Young Doctors in Their Decision-Making About General Practice as a Possible Career? A Qualitative Study. Educ Prim Care, p. 15-23.
33. Shanafelt TD, Swensen SJ (2017) Leadership and Physician Burnout: Using the Annual Review to Reduce Burnout and Promote Engagement. Am J Med Qual 32(5): 563-565.