*Corresponding author:
Mert Saynak, Department of Radiation Oncology, Trakya University Hospital, 22030, Edirne, TurkeyReceived:March 26, 2018; Published: April 12, 2018
DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2018.03.000955
To view the Full Article Peer-reviewed Article PDF
Most people with locally advanced rectal cancer are treated with chemotherapy (ChT), radiotherapy (RT), and surgery. With improved surgical techniques and the addition of neoadjuvant RT ChT, 5-year local recurrence rates have decreased from >25% to <10% [1,2]. Regarding to local/regional disease site, quality of life is a new and increasingly important goal for rectal cancer treatment. However, these advances have not appreciably decreased the risk of distant metastatic recurrence (approximately 30%), which remains the leading cause of rectal cancer-related death. That’s why, systemic treatment to control distant microscopic disease especially has become increasingly importance in recent years.
Abbreviations: ChT : Chemotherapy; RT: Radiotherapy; pCR: Complete Response; MRI: Magnetic Resonance Images; PET: Positron Emission Tomography; CT: Computed Tomography C
Introduction| What is the Importance of Complete Response?| Consolidation Treatment After (Chemo) Radiotherapy| Rationale for Non-Surgical Treatment Approach| Disadvantages of Non-Surgical Treatment Approach| Conclusion| References|
International Association of Landscape Archaeology, Czech Glass Society, Czech Republic
Department of Chemistry, Semenov Institute of Chemical Physics, USSR Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
Pharmaco-kinetics, dynamics and Drug Metabolism, Touro College of Pharmacy, USA
Professor of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Associate Professor at Department of Breast and Thyorid Surgey, Chongqing General Hospital, China