Scarantino ER*
Received: February 08, 2025; Published: February 20, 2025
*Corresponding author: Scarantino ER, Geriatric resident at AOU Careggi, Florence, University of Florence, Italy
DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2025.60.009479
Objective of the study: to collect and analyze literature data on the role of obesity and visceral adipose tissue as
a riskfactors for frailty in elders and understand the biological mechanism of this possible connection.
Materials and Methods: studies, systematic review and meta-analysis of literature data.
Results and conclusions: real pathophysiological correlation between frailty and obesity exist; meta-analysis
show that some anthropometric measures could be useful tools to predict the risk of frailty but more studies are
necessary to apply them to clinical practice.
Keywords: Frailty; Visceral Adipose Tissue; Elder People; Inflammation; Body Mass Index; Waist Circumference; Cytokines; Meta-Analysis
Abbreviations: BMI: Body Mass Index; WC: Waist Circumference; Bia: Bioimpetizometry; EVFA: Estimated Visceral Fat Area Interleukin-6 (Il-6); TNF: Tumour Necrosis Factor Insulinlike Growth Factor 1 (Igf1)
Frailty is a clinically identifiable state of diminished physiological reserve and increased vulnerability to a broad range of adverse health outcomes, becoming more common as population age. Despite the existence of various definitions, the most complete and interesting is Fried’s “frailty phenotype”: clinical syndrome resulting from altered metabolism coupled with abnormal stress responses. It’s like like a non-harmonious symphony between altered systems: metabolic one (glucose intolerance, insulin resistance), musculoskeletal (energy utilization and production by mitochondria), and stress-response system (autonomic nervous system dysregulation and hypothalamic- pituitary adrenal axis dysregulation) [1]. First manifestation of frailty is weakness, followed by slowness, physical inactivity, and, at last, weight loss [2]. The underlying biological mechanism of frailty is complex and in continuous study: the main important factors are cellular senescence, mitochondrial dysfunction, deregulated nutrient sensing, hormonal changes and chronic inflammation [3,4]. This last one has been the object of numerous studies and it has been found that one of the most pro inflammatory tissues is adipose tissue especially the visceral one [5]. In the following pages I’ll explain its metabolic function. Additionally increased adiposity is linked to higher depression rates, cognitive decline [6] and osteoporosis [7] in older individuals. All these reasons have been also proposed to mediate the pathway to frailty. Another important consideration to do is weakness as the first manifestation of frailty; in elders it’s quite typical to lose muscle mass and strength. This process it’s called “sarcopenia” and one of the possible causes is once again adipose tissue, in fact last articles in literature start to talk about “sarcopenic obesity” in seniors [5]
In conclusion, some studies have investigated whether obesity identification tools can predict the risk of frailty [8]; the following pages contain some interesting work on this possible role.
to write this article I relied on systematic reviews and meta-analysis in literature about the link between obesity and frailty status in seniors. I found some interesting analysis and cross-sectional studies about obesity indicator tools like anthropometric measures (BMI and WC) and body composition’s values by BIA (eVFA) as predictors of frailty [8,9]
From the material in the literature, I believe the best example to understand the role of fat in frailty is that of sarcopenic obesity (Figure 1) [5]. Visceral adipose tissue is a metabolically active tissue and it has number of inflammatory pathways in common to muscle; it secretes cytokines such as adiponectin, IL-6 and TNF activating macrophages, mast cells and T lymphocytes, and promoting a continuous low-level inflammation. [10-12]. This state leads to insulin resistance and reduction in the anabolic actions of IGF1, reducing muscle protein synthesis and promoting gain in fat mass and loss of muscle mass by exacerbating sarcopenia [13-14]. Also Obesity induces Leptin resistance, reducing muscle fatty oxidation and ectopic fat deposition in skeletal muscles [15,16]. Intramyocellular lipids induce dedifferentiation of mesenchymal adipocyte-like progenitor cells that express fatty tissue genes [17]. In this way regeneration potential of muscle is impaired, which might promote fibrosis, thereby promoting insulin resistance [18-19] like a feedforward cycle. In addition another important factor in sarcopenic obesity is precisely aging, promoting insulin resistance and thus accumulation of adipose tissue and sarcopenia, reducing hormones and protein synthesis [5].
Increased overall adiposity is also linked to higher depression rates, cognitive decline [6] and osteoporosis [7], due to the constant inflammation state and altered hormone secretion, impacting on health and functional abilities of elderly individuals. Lots of studies demonstrate that both obesity and a large waist circumference (WC) were associated with systemic inflammation and insulin resistance, therefore with frailty [20]. While BMI is the most widely used tool to estimate obesity, the optimal level of adiposity in older adults is still a matter of discussion. BMI doesn’t distinguish between muscle mass or fat mass. Additionally in elderly vertebral compression results in a reduction in height [21] which affects anthropometric measures such as BMI. In some reviews and meta-analysis it is demonstrated that BMI over > 29.9 is associated with high risk of frailty, but also a BMI under 18.5 represents a risk for it. The relationship between BMI and the risk of frailty highlights a non-linear association with U-shape with a nadir of risk at a BMI of 18.5–29.9 kg/m2. [8]. In fact weight loss is the last step of Fried Frailty phenotype, and manifests a state of denutrition and illness like cachexia WC is a better tool to indicate regional distribution of fat especially in seniors, even if it can’t distinguish between visceral adipose tissue and subcutaneous one [22]. In some meta-analysis adults with abdominal obesity have a significantly higher risk of frailty [8,23], in others is necessary both high BMI and WC to denote frailty risk [24]; in some cross sectional studies high WC is associated with lower MMSE scores in both genders but is significant only in males with normal BMI and WC [25].Other interesting studies suggest the use of BIA to find a correlation between adipose tissue and frailty even if is unusual tool of obesity measurement in daily clinical practice; in a cross sectional study estimated visceral fat area (eVFA) calculated by BIA is more predictive of frailty than WC or BMI and remain associated with an increased risk of frailty even after adjustments for multiple variables such as age, WC, chronic conditions, and glucose and lipid metabolism [9].
There is a pathophysiologic link between obesity and frailty, especially due to the role of visceral adipose tissue. Some systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrate that some obesity measurement tools could be used in practical clinics to predict frailty. Even more studies are necessary because there are some confounding factors like gender and comorbid conditions that could affect the relationship between BMI or WC and frailty. In addition the studies in literature were very heterogeneous and the exam by review was not easy [8,9] The use of BIA is not very common in daily clinical practice, but it seems a more direct and reliable measure than anthropometric measurements, but the study proposing this view is cross sectional and the associations observed could not establish a causal relationship between visceral fat obesity and frailty. Therefore, further longitudinal studies are required [24] Understanding the mechanism above, some effective interventions could be implemented to reduce risk of frailty like, protein intake, caloric restriction and regular aerobic exercise [5,25-27].
