Retrospect and Prospect Examining Covid-19 Mortality and Anticipating Future Challenges Volume 60- Issue 2

Murad Ali Khan

• Department of Computer Engineering, Jeju National University, Republic of Korea

Received: January 06, 2025; Published: January 30, 2025

*Corresponding author: Murad Ali Khan, Department of Computer Engineering, Jeju National University, Jeju 63243, Republic of Korea

DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2025.60.009426

Abstract PDF

The COVID-19 pandemic has unearthed many of the deep-seated problems within global health systems, highlighting great differences in mortality rates that stem from demographic and socio-economic inequalities. These challenges indicate a serious need for public health strategies that are comprehensive yet adaptable to diverse population needs across the globe. In all, governmental responses have varied, with the efficacy of the public health policies during the pandemic determining, in many cases, the course of the virus’s spread and the mortality rates. This crisis has underlined the fact that timely analysis of data and cooperation at the global level play an important role in health emergencies. The current review will take a closer look into the relationship of demographic variables to health outcomes, along with socioeconomic influences on increased vulnerabilities. It puts forward strategic recommendations toward the improvement of global health resilience and equity and mentions that any future preparedness has to be founded on flexible, inclusive health policies that can respond effectively to the challenges of emerging pandemics.

Keywords: COVID-19 Mortality; Demographic Disparities; Socio-Economic Impacts; Public Health Strategies; Global Health Resilience

The emergence of COVID-19 led to an unprecedented global health emergency, putting a strain on health systems around the world and underscoring serious vulnerabilities in public health infrastructure. The rapid dissemination of SARS-CoV-2 found many governments flat-footed, and the initial responses varied across a wide gamut, influencing the trajectory of mortality rates significantly [1]. Indeed, early measures of contact tracing and lockdowns were crucial in some regions for managing the spread, thus underlining the importance of rapid and firm actions against emerging pathogens [2]. As the pandemic evolved, it became crystal clear that social distancing and mandatory mask mandates were some of the most effective policies in public health for reducing the rates of transmission. However, full effectiveness would depend on the level of public adherence and government capacity for enforcement with minimum delay. Some studies show that countries resorting to strict policies early in time succeeded in suppressing the epidemic curve more effectively than those countries that did otherwise, showing hesitation or inconsistency in implementation [3,4]. Research into the demographic consequences of COVID-19 has underlined important differences in the way diverse population groups have passed through the pandemic. The most vulnerable were the elderly and persons with pre-existing health conditions who, compared to the general population, suffered disproportionately high rates of severe disease and mortality [5,6].

These findings raise discussions on how resources should be prioritized and how public health measures should be directed toward protection and support for these high-risk groups. The socio-economic consequences of the pandemic further complicated the response efforts, especially in the deprived and densely populated communities. It has even been realized that higher rates of transmission and mortality are blamed on small socio-economic variables such as living conditions, accessibility of health services, and work that one cannot do from home [7,8]. These conditions stress the absolute relevance of social determinant factors in health and, even more importantly, call for broad-based strategies aimed at mitigating these entrenched inequities in society. The responses have been very different internationally, with some countries using forceful measures to fight the spread and others fumbling. These differential successes stand in as critical pointers toward the imperative of coordinated global strategies and information/resource sharing across borders. The role of technology and innovation was particularly pronounced, with advances such as mRNA vaccine development and digital contact tracing apps playing an important role in the response strategy of some regions. The fast development and deployment of vaccines underlined the potential of international scientific collaboration in responding to global health emergencies [9,10]. Lessons from these varied experiences are important to draw for future preparedness.

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought into sharp focus that health systems need to be resilient, adaptable, and inclusive. Embedding technology, equity, and international cooperation will be the key components of strengthening global public health mechanisms to meet future challenges with better and more universally beneficial responses [11,12].

The COVID-19 pandemic has been nothing less than a health crisis of unprecedented proportion, and it has acted among pairs of magnifying glasses that show deep-seated inequalities within societies [13]. The variations in mortality and morbidity rates across demographic groups can be attributed to a host of factors including age, race, and overall poor health. Of all the sections of populations in the world, the elderly have taken the greatest toll in the form of mortality rate, showcasing their vulnerability to respiratory infections. This is compounded by the fact that, in many countries, there have been disproportionately higher mortality rates among racial and ethnic minorities, which are reflective of systemic health disparities and social determinants affecting these communities [14]. These observations put into perspective the need for a detailed examination of how demographic factors interplay with public health responses and the effectiveness of interventions targeted toward these groups. Policies should be designed not only with the intention of protecting the most vulnerable but also crafted in a manner to not inadvertently widen existing health disparities [15,16]. Socioeconomic status has become a determining factor in health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic [17]. Individuals of lower socioeconomic status have been especially vulnerable to virus exposure, complications, and death. Such increased vulnerability may often result from factors like living in crowded conditions, the need to work in high-exposure jobs, poor access to quality healthcare, and reduced ability to practice social distancing.

Economic barriers also often make it impossible for these populations to receive timely medical care, leading to worse health consequences of the disease burden [18]. The socio-economic impacts of COVID-19 underscore that this pandemic has not only been a biological crisis but also a social crisis, where the need for economic interventions alongside medical responses is a must in the management of public health [19]. At the very core of driving the diverse set of impacts concerning the pandemic have been socio-economic factors coupled with access to health care facilities [20]. Most often, the regions display a high contrast in which their healthcare systems are easily approachable and fully equipped in areas where affluence is rampant, while underprivileged areas present just the reverse side of the picture, where health facilities remain underfunded and overwhelmed. Such uneven healthcare landscapes have then converted into differential health outcomes during the pandemic itself, whereby poor communities have borne a disproportionately high infection rate with higher mortality. In the discussion on health accessibility, there is also a need to factor in the issue of health insurance cover that plays a vital role in one’s seeking of timely and proper treatment for COVID-19. Inequality in this context calls for an integrated approach in policy formulation regarding health, placing socio-economic concerns as intrinsic elements of health programs [21].

Finally, education has been another dividing factor in COVID-19 outcomes. Higher levels of education often equate to increased awareness and practice of public health measures such as mask-wearing and social distancing [22]. Higher levels of educational attainment are typically associated with job security, the ability to work from home, and increased health literacy-each of these factors reducing exposure to the virus and increasing overall health resilience. This correlation underlines how educational interventions should be part of the public health response to pandemics. Improvement in education and public health literacy will eventually help societies better prepare their citizens to deal with health crises, reducing the burden on healthcare systems and, therefore, overall mortality rates [23].

The COVID-19 pandemic and its post-pandemic recovery are clear avenues where strategic lessons need to be learnt in order for better preparedness in the future. The sustained menace of new variants and other potential pandemics requires the same strong, flexible health systems, which are capable of adapting to rapid responses. Among the ways going forward is strengthening the resilience of health systems, investing in public health infrastructure, and improving surveillance and data capacities for early warning and timely response to health hazards [24,25]. Further, there is a need for international cooperation if the management of pandemics is to be effectively done [26]. What is required is the establishment of a global health framework that will provide an avenue for rapid sharing of information, resources, and strategies. This must be an inclusive approach wherein all countries, irrespective of their economic standing, are accorded equal opportunities to share in support and resources in their efforts to combat health crises. Therefore, global health diplomacy and partnership will be important in the creation of a more resilient health ecosystem that would better withstand any future pandemics [27].

The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed and exacerbated underlying disparities in health outcomes linked to demographic and socio-economic factors [28,29]. The profound impact on various populations underscores the urgency of integrating equity-focused measures within public health strategies. It has become evident that safeguarding the health of vulnerable groups through targeted interventions not only reduces mortality rates but also enhances overall societal resilience against pandemics. Moreover, the experience has highlighted the critical role of swift governmental action and effective public health policies in managing health crises. As we move forward, it is imperative that lessons learned from COVID-19 inform future health preparedness and response frameworks, ensuring that they are robust, adaptable, and inclusive. Strengthening international cooperation and global health governance will also be essential in mounting an effective response to future global health challenges. This pandemic serves as a stark reminder that health equity is not just a moral imperative but a practical necessity to achieve global health security

1. Paltiel A David, Amy Zheng, Paul E Sax (2021) Clinical and economic effects of widespread rapid testing to decrease SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Annals of Internal Medicine 174(6): 803-810.
2. Carl-Etienne Juneau, Anne-Sara Briand, Pablo Collazzo, Uwe Siebert, Tomas Pueyo, et al. (2023) Effective contact tracing for COVID-19: A systematic review. Global Epidemiology 5 : 100103.
3. Klaske van Heusden, Greg E Stewart, Sarah P Otto, Guy A Dumont (2023) Effective pandemic policy design through feedback does not need accurate predictions. PLOS Global Public Health 3(2) : e0000955.
4. Itam, Urmila Jagadeeswari, Uma Warrier (2024) Future of work from everywhere: a systematic review. International Journal of Manpower 45(1): 12-48.
5. Carethers John M (2021) Insights into disparities observed with COVID‐ Journal of internal medicine 289(4): 463-473.
6. Magda Bucholc, Declan Bradley, Damien Bennett, Lynsey Patterson, Rachel Spiers, et al. (2022) Identifying pre-existing conditions and multimorbidity patterns associated with in-hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19. Scientific reports 12(1): 17313.
7. Tewodros Mulugeta, Elazar Tadesse, Tewodros Shegute, Takele Taye Desta (2021) COVID-19: socio-economic impacts and challenges in the working group. Heliyon 7(6):
8. Mohamed Buheji, Katiane da Costa Cunha, Godfred Beka, Bartola Mavrić, Yuri Leandro do Carmo de Souza, et al. (2020)The extent of covid-19 pandemic socio-economic impact on global poverty. a global integrative multidisciplinary review. American Journal of Economics 10(4): 213-224.
9. Pacces Alessio M, Maria Weimer (2020) From diversity to coordination: A European approach to COVID-19. European journal of risk regulation 11(2): 283-296.
10. Anttiroiko Ari-Veikko (2021) Successful government responses to the pandemic: Contextualizing national and urban responses to the COVID-19 outbreak in east and west. International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR) 10(2): 1-17.
11. Shivaji Kashte, Arvind Gulbake, Saadiq F El-Amin Iii, Ashim Gupta (2021) COVID-19 vaccines: rapid development, implications, challenges and future prospects. Human cell 34(3): 711-733.
12. Suneth Agampodi, Ondari D Mogeni, Rebecca Chandler, Megha Pansuriya, Jerome H Kim, et al. (2024) Global pandemic preparedness: learning from the COVID-19 vaccine development and distribution. Expert Review of Vaccines 23(1): 761-772.
13. Khorram-Manesh Amir, Krzysztof Goniewicz, Frederick M Burkle Jr (2024) Unleashing the global potential of public health: a framework for future pandemic response. Journal of Infection and Public Health 17(1): 82-95.
14. Harris Charlotte (2024) Transforming Public Health Paradigms: Lessons from COVID-19 to Enhance Global Pandemic Preparedness and Resilience. Public Health Spectrum 1(1).
15. Ali Inayat, Merrill Singer, Nicola Bulled (2024) COVID-19 Syndemics and the Global South: A World Divided. Taylor & Francis.
16. Goldstein Joshua R, Ronald D Lee (2020) Demographic perspectives on the mortality of COVID-19 and other epidemics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117(36)(2020): 22035-22041.
17. Uddhav T Kumbhar, Shaber Ali, Ajinkya Bahulekar, D B Bhoyar, Dhairyashil Patil, et al. (2023) Assessing the Impact of Health Policy Reforms on Vulnerable Populations: A Social Science Perspective. South Eastern European Journal of Public Health. 126-137.
18. Nina Sun, Kenechukwu Esom, Mandeep Dhaliwal, Joseph J Amon (2020) Human rights and digital health technologies. Health and human rights 22(2): 21.
19. Viktor Stojkoski, Zoran Utkovski, Petar Jolakoski, Dragan Tevdovski, Ljupco Kocarev, et al. (2020) The socio-economic determinants of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. MedRxiv.
20. Benfer Emily A, Mohapatra Seema, Wiley Lindsay F, Yearby Ruqaiijah (2019) Health justice strategies to combat the pandemic: Eliminating discrimination, poverty, and health disparities during and after COVID-19. Yale J Health Pol'y L & Ethics 19: 122.
21. Yibeltal Assefa, Charles F Gilks, Simon Reid, Remco van de Pas, Dereje Gedle Gete, et al. (2022) Analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons towards a more effective response to public health emergencies. Globalization and Health 18(1): 10.
22. Orestis Delardas, Konstantinos S Kechagias, Pantelis N Pontikos, Panagiotis Giannos (2022) Socio-economic impacts and challenges of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): an updated review. Sustainability 14(15): 9699.
23. Núñez Alicia, S D Sreeganga, Arkalgud Ramaprasad (2021) Access to Healthcare during COVID-19. International journal of environmental research and public health 18(6): 2980.
24. Xu Ping, Jiuqing Cheng (2021) Individual differences in social distancing and mask-wearing in the pandemic of COVID-19: The role of need for cognition, self-control and risk attitude. Personality and individual differences 175: 110706.
25. Roxana Filip, Roxana Gheorghita Puscaselu, Liliana Anchidin-Norocel, Mihai Dimian, Wesley K Savage, et al. (2022) Global challenges to public health care systems during the COVID-19 pandemic: a review of pandemic measures and problems. Journal of personalized medicine 12(8): 1295.
26. Victoria Haldane, Chuan De Foo, Salma M Abdalla, Anne-Sophie Jung, Melisa Tan, et al. (2021) Health systems resilience in managing the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons from 28 countries. Nature medicine 27(6): 964-980.
27. Sundararaman Thiagarajan, V R Muraleedharan, Alok Ranjan (2021) Pandemic resilience and health systems preparedness: lessons from COVID-19 for the twenty-first century. Journal of Social and Economic Development 23(2): 290-300.
28. Tom Bernes, Lars Brozus, Michal Hatuel-Radoshitzky, Ari Heistein, Ettore Greco, et al. (2020) Challenges of Global Governance Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic.Council on Foreign Relations Paper Series. Council on Foreign Relations, New York.
29. Hotez Peter J (2021) Preventing the next pandemic: vaccine diplomacy in a time of anti-science.