info@biomedres.us   +1 (502) 904-2126   One Westbrook Corporate Center, Suite 300, Westchester, IL 60154, USA   Site Map
ISSN: 2574 -1241

Impact Factor : 0.548

  Submit Manuscript

Research ArticleOpen Access

The Novel Prokopack Aspirator Versus Popular Pyrethrum Spray Catch: Assessment of the Composition and Abundance of Anopheles gambiae sensu lato in Nasarawa State, Central Nigeria Volume 58- Issue 1

Ombugadu A1,2*, Nanvyat N2 and Mwansat GS2

  • 1Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Federal University of Lafia, PMB 146, Lafia, Nasarawa State, Nigeria
  • 2Department of Zoology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Jos, PMB 2084, Jos, Plateau State, Nigeria

Received: July 20, 2024; Published: August 06, 2024

*Corresponding author: Ombugadu A, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Federal University of Lafia, PMB 146, Lafia, Nasarawa State, Nigeria, Email: akwash24@gmail.com; Tel: +2348034867540

DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2024.58.009093

Abstract PDF

ABSTRACT

The continuous need for complimentary, substitutionary, as well as alternative techniques in malaria vectors surveillance cannot be over emphasized. Also, the studies on complementary and or substitutionary sampling techniques in sub-Saharan Africa is lacking to a very large extent. Thus, this study compared the novel prokopack aspirator versus the popular pyrethrum spray catch in relation to the composition and abundance of Anopheles gambiae sensu lato in Nasarawa State, Central Nigeria. Mosquitoes were collected at day time from 0600 to 0900 hours using the novel Prokopack Aspirator and Pyrethrum Spray Catch (PSC) techniques. Sixty randomly selected houses were surveyed quarterly, thirty houses for each sampling technique employed. Adult mosquitoes collected were sorted and morphologically identified using standard identification keys in the laboratory. Two thousand eight hundred and forty-three (2,843) mosquitoes were collected in which differences between the anopheline group (2,774, 97.57%) and the culicine 69 (2.43%) varied significantly (2 = 2,573.7, df = 1, P < 0.0001). A significant difference (x2 = 10,659, df = 4, P < 0.0001) was observed in relation to the abundance between five mosquito species recorded in which An. gambiae s. l. was the most dominant (2,770, 97.43%). Over 60% (1,650) of the pooled female Anopheles gambiae s. l. collected were from Prokopack Aspirator collection, whereas PSC only yielded 39.78% (1,131) individuals and differences varied significantly (x2 = 118.73, df = 1, P < 0.0001) between the two sampling techniques. The number of female An. gambiae s. l. caught positively associated with the number of people that slept indoors the previous night prior to collection (t = 4.7677, df = 294, P < 0.0001, r = 0.27). In conclusion, the high mosquitoes catch obtained from Prokopack Aspirator possibly suggests its recommendation for consideration for wide usage in entomological surveillance to either compliment or substitute the PSC technique.

Keywords: Malaria Vectors Surveillance; Prokopack Aspirator; Pyrethrum Spray Catch; Nasarawa State; Central Nigeria

Abbreviations: IRS: Indoor Residual Spraying; LGA: Local Government Area; PAC: Prokopack Aspirator Catch; PMI: President’s Malaria Initiative; PSC: Pyrethrum Spray Catch; USAID: United States Agency for International Development; WHO: World Health Organization

Introduction

About half of the world’s population at risk of malaria [1], hence, the need to develop tools that are efficacious in order to mitigate biological threats to malaria [2]. The outcome of the Global Technical Strategy for Malaria 2016–2030 (GTS) morbidity milestone is still disturbing due to global deviation from the track by 40% with malaria case incidence of 59 cases per 1000 population at risk instead of the expected 35 cases per 1000 [3]. Malaria is responsible for huge economic losses based on an estimated budget of US$ 6.8 billion in 2020, rising to US$ 9.3 billion per year by 2025 and US$ 10.3 billion per year by 2030 [4] for a possible successful eradication. Of all malaria deaths globally, Africa disproportionately accounts for 93% [3]. World Health Organization (WHO) [1] revealed that the African region in the year 2020 was faced with malaria cases and deaths at 95% and 96%, respectively. In Nigeria, Anopheles stephensi was first recorded in the year 2020 [5] which may likely be an additional public health problem to overcome. A study in western Kenya found a new cryptic Anopheles species involved in the transmission of human which clearly underscores the fact that it is a very critical necessity to understand malaria vector species composition and their bionomic characteristics in the Africa region so as to develop a robust effective and efficient vector control interventions that will reduce malaria transmission [6].

Countries can achieve effective health interventions and assess the impact of their malaria control programmes only through strong malaria surveillance systems. This is the continuous and systematic collection, analysis and interpretation of malaria-related data, and the use of such data in the planning, implementation and evaluation of public health practice termed Evidence-Based [1]. Recent entomological surveillance by Nigerian Institute for Medical Research (NIMR) reported the presence of Anopheles stephensi in Gombe State, North East Nigeria [7] which is the main malaria vector in Asia [8] and categorized invasive malaria vector in Kenya, East Africa [9,10]. The use of a novel and existing protocols is key in the fight against malaria. Pyrethrum Spray Catch (PSC) which is an existing or popular technique targets the indoor resting adult mosquitoes using pyrethroid [11].

Battery-powered Prokopack Aspirator Model 1419 was developed to collect mosquitoes such as Aedes aegypti, anophelines, and Culex of all physiological stages and both sexes directly from their resting sites, allowing better estimations of species diversity, abundance, sex ratio, age structure, and physiological status [12] which is an indication of novelty and complementarity. The novel sampling methods for monitoring outdoor Anopheles mosquitoes in Eritrea by Charlwood, et al. [13] confirmed the superiority and efficiency of Prokopack Aspirator over other methods in outdoor mosquitoes survey.

Findings of Ombugadu, et al. [14] showed that associations between mosquitoes and the number of indoor sleepers positively correlated. Lwetoijera, et al. [15] similarly demonstrated in their study in rural Southern Tanzania that the density of mosquitoes increased as the number of people sleeping within the rooms increased. In a recent study in Morogoro and Dodoma in Tanzania, it was also found that a very high population of mosquitoes were collected from areas with a lot of indoor sleepers from the previous night [16].

The studies on complementary and or substitutionary sampling techniques in sub-Saharan Africa is lacking to a very large extent. There is a need for effective and affordable mosquito sampling methods. Pyrethroid knockdown collection is expensive, time, insecticide and personnel consuming, subject to inter-operator and location heterogeneity, and impractical in many urban environments [12,17]. The composition of An. gambiae s. l. in Nassarawa Eggon Local Government Area (LGA) in relation to Prokopack Aspirator and Pyrethrum Spray Catch collections is unknown. To this end, this study compared the effectiveness of Prokopack Aspirator and Pyrethrum Spray Catch in relation to the composition and abundance of Anopheles gambiae sensu lato in Nasarawa State, Central Nigeria. assessing key malaria transmission and insecticide resistance indices in An. gambiae s. l. in Nassarawa Eggon LGA, Nasarawa State, Central Nigeria.

Materials and Methods

Study Site

The study was carried out in Nassarawa Eggon LGA (Latitude 8° 54.275´ N, Longitude 8° 23.660´ E), Nasarawa State with an elevation of 445 metres (1,460 feet). It has an area of 1,208 km2 and a population of 149,129 at the 2006 census. The area is characterized by two seasons, wet and dry in the tropical savannah climate that is suitable for the cultivation of different varieties of crops. It has a mean temperature of 15.6 ℃ and 26.7 ℃ with an annual rainfall between 1317 mm and 1450 mm from April to October [18]. According to a Geographic Reconnaissance (GR) survey by Ojo, et al. [19], the average number of persons per household (HH) in the area is seven (7) individuals across the 309 towns and villages. The total number of House- Holds (HH) in the area is 213,507 in which less than five (5) years of age are 42,976 and the number of pregnant women is 7,948. Also, the average number of children less than five (5) years of age per hundred (100) HH is one hundred and eighteen (118) while the average number of pregnant women per hundred (100) HH is twenty-two (22).

Ethical Consent

An advocacy visit was made to the paramount Chief of Nassarawa Eggon LGA and the heads of villages prior to the commencement of the survey to adequately inform them of the importance of the research. They, in turn, consented and granted full permission and informed their subjects to support the study by making their houses available. Also, ethical consent was sought from heads of households selected a day before the sampling day in which they favourably accepted.

Duration of the Study

The longitudinal study lasted for two years, from June 2016 to May 2018.

Sample Collections

Mosquito samples were collected quarterly (early and late wet seasons as well as early and late dry seasons) indoors [20] using the Prokopack Aspirator and Pyrethrum Spray Catch techniques, respectively. A total of sixty (60) houses that met the WHO criteria (rooms without eaves) for mosquito day catch were randomly selected from four villages that are far apart and marked using the Global Positioning System (GPS). Thirty (30) houses were selected for each collection technique pooled from two villages, fifteen (15) houses from each village. The distance between the randomly selected houses was at least 200 metres apart. Selected houses were revisited throughout this study (i.e. each house was visited eight times within the study period). Rooms were selected a day prior to collection and heads of households and occupants of the selected rooms were informed to keep doors and windows closed during the morning hours until mosquitoes were collected. Collection of adult mosquitoes was done during the day time between 6:00 am and 9:00 am.

Indoor Anopheles gambiae Sampling by Prokopack Aspirator

The Prokopack Aspirator collection was as described by Vazquez-Prokopec, et al. [17]. The Prokopack Aspirator (Plate 1a) is a battery powered equipment for insects’ collection [17]. The Prokopack Aspirator operation is simple (Plate 1b). A headlamp was worn on the head so as to successfully move around selected rooms without hitches in the course of collection. Prior to the commencement of the operation in the room, all windows and doors were closed. The battery in the outer compartment of the backpack was attached very carefully to the power cord (red indicates positive polarity and black indicates negative polarity) of the Prokopack Aspirator (Plate 1c). The Prokopack Aspirator was turned on with a rotary switch located by the handle. The Prokopack Aspiratior was held with the hand and moved around on wall and ceiling surfaces, underneath the bed and tables, to aspirate all the endophilic mosquitoes [17]. After collections were made in each room at an average of eight minutes, the lid on the collection cup was properly covered before turning off the unit. Afterwards, cotton wool well soaked with chloroform was used to knockdown mosquitoes for a period of five minutes and were transferred into a well labeled petri dish and transported to the Insectary of the Department of Zoology, University of Jos for sorting, morphological identification and molecular processing which cut across characterization of Anopheles gambiae s. l. siblings, sporozoite screening, blood meal source, and Sanger sequencing to determine their population structure in the area.

Plate 1

biomedres-openaccess-journal-bjstr

Indoor Anopheles Gambiae s. l. sampling by Pyrethrum Spray Catch

The pyrethrum spray catch (PSC) operation was carried out as described by Williams [21]. Firstly, before spraying, all animals indoors were removed, all food covered and small furniture removed from the room the collection was to take place. The operation was carried out very carefully with a headlamp that was worn on the head to lighten the room. All windows and doors were closed. White cotton sheets were spread underneath the tables, laid to cover the floor completely and all flat surfaces followed by careful spraying of the room with Raid insecticide which contains pyrethroids (these include Deltamethrin, D-allethrin and Tetramethrin). The spraying was done in a clockwise direction towards the ceiling until the room was filled with a fine mist. The sprayed room was rapidly exited, closed the door and waited for 10 minutes in order to knockdown the mosquitoes. Beginning from the room’s entrance, the corners of the sheet were lifted and the sheet was taken outside. All knocked down mosquitoes were collected in the daylight with forceps and placed in a well labeled petri-dish, on top of a layer of damp cotton wool and filter paper. Mosquitoes collected in each house were stored in separate petri-dishes appropriately labeled (collection date and hour, village, household number/ name of head of household) and transported to the Insectary of the Department of Zoology, University of Jos for sorting, morphological identification and molecular processing.’

Morphological Identification

Mosquitoes were sorted out and morphologically identified based on their visible features with the aid of a dissecting microscope and identification keys [22-26]. Identified An. gambiae s. l. was preserved dry singly in Eppendorf tubes containing silica gel and tissue paper barrier for molecular processing.

Statistical Analysis

Data obtained was analyzed using R Console software version 4.0.2. Pearson’s Chi-square (χ2) test was used to compare proportions between mosquito groups, species, and sampling techniques, respectively. Associations between mosquito abundance and number of occupants that slept indoors the previous night was analyzed using Pearson’s product-moment correlation test. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Composition of Indoor Resting Mosquitoes in Nassarawa Eggon LGA, Nasarawa State, Obtained from Two Sampling Techniques

A total of 2,843 mosquitoes were collected in this study in relation to the two indoor sampling techniques employed, out of which the anopheline group was dominant 2774 (97.57%) over the culicines 69 (2.43%) as shown in Table 1. Therefore, there was a very high significant difference (x2 = 2573.7, df = 1, P < 0.0001) between the population of the two mosquito groups. Figure 1 shows the order of dominance of five mosquito species recorded as follows: An. gambiae s. l. 2770 (97.43%) > Cx. quinquefasciatus 67 (2.36%) > An. coustani 3 (0.11%) > Ae. aegypti 2 (0.07%) > An. rufipes 1 (0.04%). Thus, there was a very high significant difference (x2 = 10659, df = 4, P < 0.0001) in the abundance of indoor resting mosquito species. Within the anopheline group, the population of indoor resting An. gambiae s. l. was the highest, 2770 (99.86%), while the proportion of An. coustani 3 (0.11%) and An. rufipes 1 (0.34%) was very low (Table 1). Hence, the variation in abundance between anopheline species showed a very high significant difference (x2 = 5524, df = 2, P < 0.0001). Similarly, the population of indoor resting Cx. quinquefasciatus was higher (67, 97.10%) than Ae. aegypti (2, 2.90%) within the culicine group showing a very high significant difference (x2 = 61.232, df = 1, P < 0.0001) in abundance between culicine species. The pooled number of indoor resting female mosquitoes was more (2776, 97.64%) than males (67, 2.36%). The abundance of indoor resting females was significantly higher (x2 = 2581.3, df = 1, P < 0.0001) than that of male mosquitoes. The female anopheline was higher (99.06%) than males (0.94%), while the situation was reversed among the culicine group in which males (41, 59.42%) were more than females (28, 40.58%) as shown in Table 1.

Figure 1

biomedres-openaccess-journal-bjstr

Table 1: Checklist of Mosquitoes Collected in Nassarawa Eggon LGA, Nasarawa State, Using Two Sampling Techniques.

biomedres-openaccess-journal-bjstr

Note: PAC: Prokopack Aspirator Collection; PSC: Pyrethrum Spray Catch

Mosquitoes Abundance in Relation to the Two Sampling Techniques Employed

Prokopack Aspirator collection (PAC) had 60.22% (1712) of pooled mosquito species collected whereas PSC only had 39.78% (1131) individuals, as shown in Table 1. Therefore, the abundance of pooled mosquitoes in relation to the two sampling techniques showed a significant difference (x2 = 118.73, df = 1, P < 0.0001).

Abundance of Female Anopheles Mosquitoes in Relation to Sampling Techniques

The abundance of female Anopheles mosquitoes between PAC and PSC techniques was 1650 (60.04%) and 1098 (39.96%), respectively (Table 1). Thus, there was a significant difference (x2 = 110.88, df = 1, P < 0.0001) in the mean abundance of female Anopheles mosquitoes in relation to the two sampling techniques. Also, PAC had more female An. gambiae 1649 (60.09%) than PSC 1095 (39.91%) technique. Hence, the abundance of female An. gambiae in relation to the two sampling techniques significantly varied (x2 = 111.85, df = 1, P < 0.0001).

Association Between Abundance of Female Anopheles gambiae and Household Occupants Prior to Mosquito Collections

There was a relatively strong positive association between the number of female An. gambiae and the number of people that slept indoors the previous night (t = 4.7677, df = 294, P < 0.0001, r = 0.27, Figure 2).

Figure 2

biomedres-openaccess-journal-bjstr

Discussion

Composition and Distribution of Mosquitoes in Nassarawa Eggon LGA

The high mosquito population and diverse species recorded in Nassarawa Eggon LGA of Nasarawa State, Nigeria suggests that the lowland nature of the area, which is characterized by high temperature and relative humidity as well as the presence of generally hilly and rocky terrains, with numerous rivers and streams in the study area which empties into the Benue River greatly supports mosquitoes breeding success all year round. The occurrence of mosquitoes despite the pilot study of the Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS) in 2012 under the President’s Malaria Initiative (PMI) funded by the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) [27,28] as well as the IRS repeat cycle in 2013 [29] is quite alarming and worrisome. The diverse mosquito species recorded in this study agree with the studies by Chuntar, et al. [30], who found six Anopheles species in some selected eco-settings of Nasarawa State. The number of anopheline mosquitoes recorded is in line with the finding of Ombugadu, et al. [31], who reported Anopheles gambiae as the most dominant over culicines collected in a peri-urban area.

Abundance of Female Anopheles mosquitoes in Relation to Sampling Techniques

The remarkable variation in abundance of Anopheles between sampling techniques in favour of the PAC suggests that it is a highly efficient mosquito collection equipment. This observation aligns with recent findings by Ombugadu, et al. [14,32], who conducted a mosquito survey in student Hostels of the Federal University of Lafia, Nasarawa State, using a Prokopack Aspirator; the equipment proved efficient in mosquito collection. Earlier studies by Maia, et al. [33] comparing the CDC Backpack aspirator and the PAC in the sampling of mosquitoes support the assertion about the effectivity of PAC over the CDC backpack aspirator. Current research on novel sampling methods for monitoring mosquitoes by Charlwood, et al. [13] explored techniques including odour baited trap, a novel tent-trap, human landing collection and PAC. Again, in that study, the Prokopack Aspirator was revealed to be most effective in mosquito collection. Kakilla, et al. [34- 36], have also adopted the use of PAC to survey malaria vector species. This observation may be due to its simple and user-friendly nature, as it can be easily carried and manoeuvred, especially for an efficient field collection. In contrast, the CDC light traps and PSC demonstrated some efficiency during a study on collection of mosquitoes for entomological indices in Western Kenya as reported by Abong’o, et al. [37]. A similar opinion from Onyango [38] suggests that the efficiency of the Prokopack Aspirator in collecting anopheline mosquitoes is second to the light traps.

Mosquitoes Abundance in Relation to Number of Indoor Occupants

The strong positive association between several Anopheles mosquitoes and indoor occupants observed may be due to the high concentration of volatiles such as carbon dioxide (CO2). These findings tally with that of McCann, et al. [39], in a study on elucidating the variation in adult Anopheles indoor resting abundance, the relative effects of larval habitat proximity and insecticide treated bed net use established that the number of An. gambiae s. s. and An. funestus was positively associated with the number of occupants in the room; however, the number of An. arabiensis decreased with an increasing number of people sleeping in the room. A fairly similar study by Obembe, et al. [40] also observed an association between indoor occupants and the abundance of indoor resting Anopheles mosquitoes. Nevertheless, Obembe and others focused on the differential behaviour of endophilic Anopheles mosquitoes in rooms occupied by tobacco smokers and non-smokers in two Nigerian villages, where a reduced mosquito endophily was observed in the habitations of tobacco smokers compared to the non-smokers. The current finding is congruent with previous studies by Kirby, et al. [41], who also proved that mosquito numbers increased per additional person in the house. Likewise, Animut, et al. [42] have also opined that the mean number of Anopheles mosquitoes resting in houses where greater than or equal to five occupants slept the previous night was significantly higher than in those with less than or equal to four occupants. This, again, emphasizes the strong positive association between the number of Anopheles mosquitoes and the number of indoor occupants in the room.

Conclusion

This study shows that the novel Prokopack Aspirator is very efficient and eco-friendly equipment that can complement or substitute already popular pyrethrum spray collection, which is laborious. The dominant malaria vector in the Nassarawa Eggon area is An. gambiae sensu lato. The number of malaria vectors correspondingly rises for every additional increase in the number of indoor occupants. The Prokopack Aspirator is hereby recommended for consideration for wide usage in entomological surveillance based on its efficiency and eco-friendliness with less workforce. Also, the number of indoor occupants in the study area should always be low (at most 4 persons per room) to reduce the concentration of volatiles that easily attract mosquitoes to human host.

Declarations

Conflict of Interest

All the authors declared no conflict for the publication of this article.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Tertiary Education Trust Fund (FUL/REG/TETFund/0002/VOL.2/007) and the Management of the Federal University of Lafia. Also, we are most grateful to the Chief, Village Heads and inhabitants of Nassarawa Eggon LGA who granted us access to their houses during the course of this study. The unwavering support of our field assistant in person of Mr. James Namo Musa is commendable and highly appreciated.

References

  1. (2022) WHO. Malaria.
  2. (2023) WHO. World Malaria Report 2023. Geneva: World Health Organization. pp. 356.
  3. (2021a) WHO. World malaria report 2021. pp. 322.
  4. (2021b) WHO. Global technical strategy for malaria 2016-2030. p. 40.
  5. Ochomo EO, Milanoi S, Abong'o B, Onyango B, Muchoki M, et al. (2023) Detection of Anopheles stephensi Mosquitoes by Molecular Surveillance, Kenya. Emerging Infectious Diseases 29(12): 2498-2508.
  6. Zhong D, Hemming Schroeder E, Wang X, Kibret S, Zhou G, et al. (2020) Extensive new Anopheles cryptic species involved in human malaria transmission in western Kenya. Scientific Reports 10: 16139-16152.
  7. (2023) Researchers on the Frontlines Tracking the Spread of a New Mosquito in Nigeria. President’s Malaria Initiative.
  8. Chavshin AR, Oshaghi MA, Vatandoost H, Hanafi-Bojd AA, Raeisi A, et al. (2014) Molecular characterization, biological forms and sporozoite rate of Anopheles stephensi in southern Iran. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine 4(1): 47-51.
  9. Kweka EJ (2022) Anopheles stephensi: a guest to watch in urban Africa. Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines 8(1): 7-10.
  10. Service M (1993) Mosquito Ecology. Field Sampling Methods (2nd)., London & New York: Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd. pp. 988.
  11. Owino EA (2023) Why Kenya should worry about Anopheles stephensi. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine 16: 99-101.
  12. Silver JB (2008) Mosquito Ecology, Field Sampling Methods. In: 3rd (Edn.,). New York: Springer, pp. 1477.
  13. Charlwood JD, Andegiorgish AK, Asfaha YE, Weldu LT, Petros F, et al. (2021) Novel sampling methods for monitoring Anopheles arabiensis from Eritrea. PeerJ 9: e11497- e11522.
  14. Ombugadu A, Maikenti JI, Maro SA, Vincent SO, Polycarp IA, et al. (2020a). Survey of Mosquitoes in Students Hostels of Federal University of Lafia, Nasarawa State, Nigeria. Biomedical Journal of Science & Technical Research 28(4): 2020.
  15. Lwetoijera DW, Kiware SS, Mageni ZD, Dongus S, Harris C, et al. (2013) A Need for Better Housing to Further Reduce Indoor Malaria Transmission in Areas with High Bed Net Coverage. Parasites & Vectors 6: 1-9.
  16. Munisi DZ, Mathania MM (2022) Adult Anopheles Mosquito Distribution at a Low and High Malaria Transmission Site in Tanzania. BioMed Research International 2022: 6098536-6098543.
  17. Vazquez-Prokopec GM, Galvin WA, Kelly R, Kitron U (2009) A new, cost-effective, battery- powered aspirator for adult mosquito collections. Journal of Medical Entomology 46(6): 1256-1259.
  18. Abdullahi A (2017) The Impact of Climate Change on the Political Economy of Food Production, A Study of Nassarawa Eggon LGA of Nasarawa State, Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS) 22(11): 63-71.
  19. Ojo W, Onazi M, Olaniyi O (2016) Geographical Reconnaissance of Household in Northern Nigeria towards Optimizing Indoor Residual Spraying Method for Malaria Elimination. Journal of Geographic Information System 8: 737-748.
  20. Umar A, Kabir BGJ, Abdullahi MB, Barde A, Misau AA, et al. (2015) Anopheline mosquitoes in human dwelling at malaria vector sentinel sites in Bauchi State, Nigeria. Advanced Studies in Biology 7(7): 323-333.
  21. Williams J, Pinto J (2012) Training manual on Malaria Entomology for Entomology and Control Technicians (Basic Level). p. 78.
  22. Carpenter SJ, LaCasse WJ (1955) Mosquitoes of North America (North of Mexico). Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 1-495.
  23. Gillies MT, Coetzee MA (1987) A Supplement to the Anophelinae of Africa South of the Sahara (Afrotropical Region). Johannesburg: Publications of the South African Institute for Medical Research 55: 1-143.
  24. Darsie RFJr, Ward RA (2004) Identification and geographical distribution of the mosquitoes of North America, North of Mexico. Mosquito Systematics Supplement 1: 1-313.
  25. Service MW (2004) Medical Entomology for Students (3rd)., England: Cambridge University Press. pp. 285.
  26. Kent RJ (2006) The mosquitoes of Macha, Zambia. PhD thesis in Johns Hopkins Malaria Research Institute, Department of Molecular Microbiology and immunology Johns Hopkins Blomberg School of Public Health Balti More M.D. USA. p. 33.
  27. (2012) Abt Associates Inc. PMI | Africa IRS (AIRS) Project, Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS 2) Task Order Four, Nigeria End of Spray Report 2012.
  28. Mwansat GS (2012a) Entomological Monitoring of Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS) Operation in Doma and Nassarawa Eggon LGAs, Nasarawa State, Nigeria- Baseline, Quality Assurance, Post-IRS Assessment and Susceptibility Tests. A Report Submitted to President’s Malaria Initiative in Conjunction with Abt Associates, p. 21.
  29. Inyama PU, Samdi LM, Nsa H, Iwuchukwu NO, Kolyada L, et al. (2014) Population Dynamics of Major Malaria Vectors and the Impact of Indoor Residual Spraying on Entomological Inoculation Rate in Nasarawa State, North Central Nigeria. The President’s Malaria Initiative 1363: 1,
  30. Chuntar HS, Kayode OI, Omalu ICJ, Sherifat AF, Sunday ES, et al. (2021) Spatiotemporal Distribution and Composition of Anopheles Mosquito Species in Some Selected Eco-Settings of Nasarawa State North Central Nigeria. American Journal of Biology and Life Sciences 9(1): 1-9.
  31. Ombugadu A, Ekawu RA, Pam VA, Odey SA, Igboanugo SI, et al. (2020b) Feeding Behaviour of Mosquito Species in Mararraba-Akunza, Lafia Local Government Area, Nasarawa State, Nigeria. Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research 25(1): 18742-18751.
  32. Ombugadu A, Jibril AB, Mwansat GS, Njila HL, Attah AS, et al. (2022) Composition and Distribution of Mosquito Vectors in a Peri-Urban Community Surrounding an Institution of Learning in Lafia Metropolis, Nasarawa State, Central Nigeria. Journal of Zoological Research 4(3): 20-31.
  33. Maia MF, Robinson A, John A, Mgando J, Simfukwe E, et al. (2011) Comparison of the CDC Backpack Aspirator and the Prokopack Aspirator for Sampling Indoor- and Outdoor-Resting Mosquitoes in Southern Tanzania. Parasites & Vectors 4: 124-134.
  34. Kakilla CE, Manjurano A, Nelwin K, Martin J, Mashauri F, et al. (2020) Malaria vector species composition and entomological indices following indoor residual spraying in regions bordering Lake Victoria, Tanzania. Malaria Journal 19: 1-14.
  35. Mburu MM, Zembere K, Mzilahowa T, Terlouw AD, Malenga T, et al. (2021) Impact of cattle on the abundance of indoor and outdoor resting malaria vectors in southern Malawi. Malaria Journal 20: 1-11.
  36. Machani MG, Ochomo E, Amimo F, Mukabana WR, Githeko AK, et al. (2022) Behavioral responses of pyrethroid resistant and susceptible Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes to insecticide treated bed net. PLoS ONE 17(4): e0266420- e0266436.
  37. Abong'o B, Gimnig JE, Torr SJ, Longman B, Omoke D, et al. (2020). Impact of indoor residual spraying with pirimiphos-methyl (Actellic 300CS) on entomological indicators of transmission and malaria case burden in Migori County, western Kenya. Scientific Reports 10(1): 4518-4532.
  38. Onyango SA (2013) Evaluation of the effectiveness of adult mosquito sampling methods in three ecological habitats in Kwale County in South Coast, Kenya. A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the award of Master of Science Degree (Medical Entomology) in the School of Pure and Applied Sciences of Kenyatta University, p. 67.
  39. McCann RS, Messina JP, MacFarlane DW, Bayoh MN, Gimnig JE, et al. (2017) Explaining variation in adult Anopheles indoor resting abundance, the relative effects of larval habitat proximity and insecticide treated bed net use. Malaria Journal 16: 1-14.
  40. Obembe A, Popoola KOK, Oduola AO, Awolola ST (2018) Differential Behaviour of Endophilic Anopheles Mosquitoes in Rooms Occupied by Tobacco Smokers and Non-smokers in Two Nigerian Villages. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management 22(6): 981-985.
  41. Kirby MJ, Green C, Milligan PM, Sismanidis C, Jasseh M, et al. (2008). Risk factors for house-entry by malaria vectors in a rural town and satellite villages in The Gambia. Malaria Journal 7: 1-9.
  42. Animut A, Balkew M, Lindtjørn B (2013) Impact of housing condition on indoor-biting and indoor-resting Anopheles arabiensis density in a highland area, central Ethiopia. Malaria Journal 12: 1-8.