Error Correction Way Volume 57- Issue 5

Yaşar Bilge*

• Ankara University of Medicine Faculty Forensic Medicine Department, Turkey

Received: July 13, 2024; Published: July 24, 2024

*Corresponding author: Yaşar Bilge, Ankara University of Medicine Faculty Forensic Medicine Department, Turkey

DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2024.57.009059

Abstract PDF

The way to reach the quality standard in the field of occupational health and safety has been opened.

Keywords: Error; Root Cause Analysis; Fault Mode Effect Analysis; Hazard Analysis Critic Control Points

The patient is harmed as a result of an error [1,2]. Most physicians do not know how to detect this [3]. According to Kant’s four classes of duty are thus: perfect duties to oneself, such as the prohibition of suicide; perfect duties to others, such as the prohibition of deceitful promises; imperfect duties to oneself, such as the prescription to cultivate one's talents; and imperfect duties to others.

I prepare this text on the grounds of improving quality assurance in my profession, which I will be doing business with for 30 years.

Physcian have Bias. These are Following

Confirmation bias, fixation bias, posterior probability error, basic degree of neglect, early shutdown, usability trend, ego bias, status as prejudice, technological case scenario bias, omission bias, conjunction fallacy, post hoc fallacy, sunk cost, instinctive bias, conservative bias [4]. We Improve our Quality of Life by Updating on the Go. Sometimes we Lose our Peace. Thus, our Comfort is Disrupted. These are:

Individual:

1. Postpone

2. To prefer it over another situation.

3. Prioritizing emotions.

Group Requirement: What if they call you greedy? I interfere in someone else's business.

Socially: Tell him this. He can't do this to me. In comparative justice we kill it. We act extremely.

We become Stanford prison guards.

Domestic: Inflation.

International: War.

Root Cause Analysis, Hazard Analysis Critic Control Points, Fault Mode Effect Analysis Methods are Used [5,6].

These are following:

• Levels 0: The doctor is not aware of the error.

• Level 1. The doctor realizes the mistake. He immediately thinks of ways to fix it. Root cause analysis, hazard analysis critic control points, fault mode effect analysis methods are used.

• Level 2. The doctor apologizes to himself. Calculates the error severity score. He plans his speech accordingly.

• Level 3. He corrected his mistake. The process has improved. His peace has been restored.

According to victim.adalet.gov.tr [7]:

Guide to approaching the victim. 2021, Ankara.

Victim Requirements:

• To be safe.

• Be understood.

• To be listened to.

Respecting your Privacy:

• Not to be judged

• Not to be blamed

• To be important

• Being able to express yourself

• To be informed about the process.

• To have access to appropriate diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation.

• To be supported.

• May experience emotional turmoil

• He may be afraid of not being understood

• He may be afraid of the continuation of the violence he encountered.

• He may have feelings of revenge

• He may be underestimating the situation

• He can solve the problem himself

• The idea that oneself is the cause of victimization

• Feeling like he can't be helped

• May have the desire to protect his family

• He may be having suicidal thoughts

• It should be brought to mind and examined.

1. Level 4. Accordingly, by apologizing, the communication level with the patient has reached the quality level.

2. Level 5. Major error effect has been compensated. A standard form was created to prevent new errors from occurring. Diagnostic errors were often caused by cognitive biases [8]. The most commonly cited biases were availability bias, confirmation bias, anchoring, prematüre closure [8]. Protocol of clinical care of childhood sexual abuse is offered for a systemic review. So, scientists need to correct these faults with notice [4,8].

From this assignment, a process creation method for quality has been developed [9,10].

None.

To realize my mistakes and develop ways to correct them.

Conflict of Interest

The author has no conflicts of interest to declare.

1. Bilge Y, Geçim E (2014) Medikolegal düzlemde tıpta uygulama hataları. Ankara Üniversitesi basımevi, Ankara. medikolegalduzlem.com
2. Sevann Helo, Carol Anne E Moulton (2017) Complications: acknowledging, managing, and coping with human error. Transl Androl Urol 6(4): 773-782.
3. Bilge Y (2008) Kaygılı insanların sağlıklarıyla ilgili eğitim-öğretim alanındaki sorunları ve çözümleri, Ümit Ofset Matbaacılık, Aralı
4. Loncharich MF, Robbins RC, Durning SJ, Soh M, Merkebu J (2023) Cognitive biases in internal medicine: a scoping review. Diagnosis (Berl) 10(3): 205-214.
5. Bilge Y, Adli Tıp (2008) Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri. İ
6. Bilge Y (2016) İş sağlığı ve güvenliği yazıları, s 181-224, Seçkin Kitabevi, Ankara.
7. (2021) Mağadalet.gov.tr. Mağdura yaklaşım klavuzu, Ankara.
8. Zunaid Ismail Vally, Razia AG, Khammissa Gal Feller, Raoul Ballyram, Michaela Beetge, et al. (2023) Errors in clinical diagnosis: a narrative review. J of International Medical Research 51(8): 1-10.
9. Michael F Loncharich, Richel C Robbins, Steven J Durning, Michael Soh, Jerusalem Merkebu (2023) Cognitive biases in internal medicine: a scoping review. Diagnosis 10(3): 205-214.
10. Gabriel Otterman, Ulugbek Nurmatov, Ather Akhlaq, Aideen Naughton, Aison Mary Kemp, et al. (2023). Appraisal of published guildlines in European countries addressing the clinical care of childhood sexual abuse: protocol for a systematic review. BMJ Open 13(5): e064008.