info@biomedres.us   +1 (502) 904-2126   One Westbrook Corporate Center, Suite 300, Westchester, IL 60154, USA   Site Map
ISSN: 2574 -1241

Impact Factor : 0.548

  Submit Manuscript

Review ArticleOpen Access

Aging and Balance Control: Analyzing the Increased Attentional Demands – A Comprehensive Review Volume 57- Issue 3

Sachin Gupta1 and Deepika Singla2*

  • 1Department of Physiotherapy, School of Allied Health Sciences, Galgotias University, India
  • 2Department of Physiotherapy, School of Nursing Sciences & Allied Health, Jamia Hamdard, India

Received: June 27, 2024; Published: July 08, 2024

*Corresponding author: Deepika Singla, Assistant Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Nursing Sciences & Allied Health, Jamia Hamdard, Hamdard Nagar, New Delhi, India

DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2024.57.008999

Abstract PDF

ABSTRACT

As individuals age, the need for attentional resources to maintain postural control increases due to changes in sensorimotor functions. Older adults often prioritize balance over secondary tasks to preserve function. Reduced or conflicting sensory information further increases these demands. Performing a secondary task in such conditions can strain attentional resources, potentially compromising stability and increasing fall risk. The attention required for maintaining balance is affected by the characteristics of secondary tasks, including their complexity, type (motor, cognitive, visual, or auditory), visual demands, working memory involvement, and the need for articulation. Understanding these factors is crucial for creating strategies to improve postural control and prevent falls in the elderly. Understanding the varying attentional demands in different postures and positions aids clinicians and physiotherapists in assessing and selecting appropriate secondary tasks for effective rehabilitation in the elderly.

Keywords: Aging; Attention; Balance; Older Adults; Sensory

Abbreviation: RT: Reaction Time

Introduction

Compared to young adults, healthy older adults exhibit reduced performance in both balance and cognitive tasks when these tasks are performed simultaneously. This relationship has been studied across various aspects, including postural sway, neuromuscular activity, stepping behavior, postural control recovery from self-induced or external displacements, and walking [1].

Attentional Requirements of Maintaining an Upright Stance

Lajoie et al. investigated the attentional requirements for maintaining posture and walking in both young and elderly individuals. They evaluated reaction times (RT) to an auditory task in four different positions: seated, standing with a broad base of support, standing with a narrow base of support, and walking. Elderly participants had slower RTs and shorter stride lengths in challenging positions, indicating that postural tasks required more attention with age [2]. Melzer et al. studied postural control while performing cognitive tasks in young and older adults. Older adults showed increased postural sway and muscle activity, especially in dual-task conditions and with a narrower base of support, indicating a greater impact on balance [3]. Berger and Bernard-Demanze explored the impact of a spatial memory task on postural control, discovering that younger adults prioritize cognition while older adults prioritize posture when performing dual tasks [4].

Attentional Requirements for Postural Recovery Following Voluntary Movements

Stelmach, Zelaznik, and Lowe investigated postural control during voluntary arm movements in eight older and eight younger adults, incorporating secondary tasks (a cognitive math task or a motor hand squeeze) during the latter half of a 50-second standing trial. They measured the impact on the center of foot pressure’s speed, range, and variability during arm swinging and recovery. Older adults took longer to recover from arm swinging while performing the cognitive task, unlike the motor task, which had no significant difference between age groups. The study also revealed that simple manual tasks had less impact on postural control compared to complex cognitive tasks [5].

The Attention Required for Stepping in Response To Perturbations

Automatic postural responses are rapid, involuntary actions that help maintain balance in response to unexpected stimuli, typically initiated by somatosensory inputs within 250 milliseconds [6]. These responses include four main strategies: ankle, hip, suspensory, and stepping. Individuals with neurological disorders often adopt abnormal strategies. For instance, those with vestibular disorders tend to rely on the ankle strategy, while those with somatosensory loss use the hip strategy. The stepping strategy is employed when other strategies are insufficient or when the center of gravity exceeds the base of support. Older adults predominantly use the stepping strategy to recover from balance disturbances [7,8]. Melzer and Oddsson investigated 66 healthy elderly individuals and 12 young subjects, examining rapid voluntary stepping in various directions on a force platform under single- and dual-task conditions. The elderly participants were significantly slower in all stepping parameters in both conditions, with dual tasks increasing the initiation phase by 108% in the elderly group. This suggests that balance loss in the elderly may stem from insufficient neural resources for multitasking [9].

Brown, Shumway-Cook, and Woollacott investigated how postural recovery places differing attentional demands on young and older adults, revealing that older adults need to allocate more attention to execute effective recovery strategies. In older adults, stepping strategies were more attentionally demanding, and failure to allocate sufficient attention could lead to falls [10]. Zettel, McIlroy, and Maki studied how attentional demands affect stepping reactions and gaze behavior in both young and older adults. Their findings revealed that older adults exhibited diminished anticipatory postural adjustments during tracking tasks, resulting in heightened lateral center-of-mass movement. This suggests that impaired attentional shifting among older adults could elevate the likelihood of falls. [11].

The Cognitive Demands of Walking

Research frequently investigates how aging influences dual-task walking, where individuals must walk while simultaneously engaging in attention-demanding activities like conversation or monitoring their surroundings for vehicles. Lindenberger, Marsiske, and Baltes: Examined 47 young, 45 middle-aged, and 48 older adults trained in a mnemonic technique. Participants walked on narrow tracks while encoding word lists. Dual-task costs increased with age, indicating a greater need for cognitive control as one age [12]. Li, Lindenberger, Freund, and Baltes examined cognitive (memorization) and sensorimotor (walking on a narrow track) performance. They found that older adults prioritize walking over memory tasks and can improve their walking performance by using external memory aids [13]. Hollman, Kovash, Kubik, and Linbo investigated gait velocity and variability in young, middle-aged, and older adults under dual-task conditions. They found that older adults showed slower walking speeds and increased variability in their stride, which were associated with diminished cognitive performance [14]. Priest, Salmon, and Hollman: Found similar detrimental effects on gait parameters in older women, suggesting increased attentional requirements for walking with age and a higher risk of falls during cognitively demanding tasks [15].

The Cognitive Demands Involved in Avoiding Obstacles

Chen et al.: Compared young and older adults stepping over a virtual obstacle. Both groups had an increased risk of contact when attention was divided, with a significantly greater effect in older adults [16]. Schrodt, Mercer, Giuliani, and Hartman: Analyzed gait and cognitive task performance in older adults under dual-task conditions. Gait parameters changed minimally, but cognitive performance decreased, suggesting older adults prioritize gait to maintain stability [17].

Influence of Secondary Task Characteristics on Attentional Demands for Balance Control

Previous sections reviewed the impact of concurrent cognitive tasks on balance, noting increased attentional demands with the difficulty of balance tasks in older adults. The characteristics of secondary tasks also influence attention requirements for balance, with varying effects depending on the cognitive task’s complexity [18]. Stelmach et al. 5 found that simple manual tasks are less disruptive to postural control compared to complex cognitive tasks. Lajoie et al. 2 reported that a simple reaction time task did not affect posture, contrasting with findings suggesting more complex tasks may impact balance. Shumway-Cook, Brauer, and Woollacott observed that secondary tasks, whether manual (e.g., carrying a full cup of water) or cognitive (e.g., counting backward by threes), increased completion time for the Timed Up and Go Test uniformly, without enhancing its predictive ability [19]. Daily activities often involve secondary tasks like talking and affecting posture. Yardley et al. [20] studied young adults performing tasks on static and unstable surfaces, finding that articulation increased postural sway, attributed to respiratory activity or central interference between speech and balance. This concept underpins the “Stops Talking While Walking” test, identifying older adults at fall risk [21]. Dault, Yardley, and Frank [22] noted in young adults that articulation tasks increased sway while non-articulation tasks increased stiffness, suggesting motor task requirements influence postural sway changes [23].

Older adults, relying more on vision due to sensory declines, show prolonged reaction times during walking tasks, suggesting increased attention demands and fall risk from visual demands [24]. Bock highlighted visually demanding tasks’ impact on dual-task performance and potential fall risk in older adults during walking and visual observation [25]. In contrast, Jamet et al. [26] found a visual-verbal Stroop task did not affect postural control in healthy older adults, while mental counting increased instability, tied to visual reliance and internal visual imagery. Memory task impacts on postural control show older adults sway more with visual-spatial working memory tasks (Maylor and Wing) [23], or exhibit postural instability with various working memory tasks (Dault, Frank, Allard) [27]. Beauchet et al. [28] noted arithmetic tasks disrupt lateral gait stability in frail older adults, unlike semantic memory-dependent verbal fluency tasks. Redfern et al. [29] found age groups engaged attention for postural control during reaction time tasks, with auditory responses more impacted in older adults during perturbations.

Sensory Influences on Attentional Demands of Balance Control

Balance relies on somatosensory, visual, and vestibular inputs 6, [30-33]. Reduced sensory inputs increase balance attentional demands, especially in older adults (Teasdale, Bard, LaRue, Fleury) [34]. Shumway-Cook et al. found cognitive tasks affect older adults’ postural stability, more so with falls history [35]. They studied sensory context on postural stability in young and older adults during dual-tasking, finding older adults unstable without reliable visual and somatosensory signals. Redfern et al. found sensory integration demands attention, increasing sway during conflicts in older adults. With age, walking, obstacle avoidance, and balance control’s attentional demands increase, heightening fall risk.

Summary

This study highlights that compared to younger adults, maintaining balance is more demanding for older adults, especially when simultaneously performing cognitive tasks, which can significantly impair balance and recovery abilities. Older adults place a higher priority on preserving balance than on secondary tasks to maintain overall functionality. Woollacott and Shumway-Cook attribute these preferences to age-related declines in sensory and motor systems, as well as reduced attentional capacity, either individually or in combination. Paul, Ada, and Canning also link these issues to decreased physical activity and subsequent loss of multitasking ability due to disuse [36-38]. The attentional demands associated with maintaining balance are affected by several characteristics of secondary tasks, such as their complexity, type (whether motor or cognitive), sensory requirements, and whether they involve working memory or articulation. As age increases, postural control necessitates greater attentional resources, exacerbated by age-related sensorimotor changes. Diminished sensory inputs or conflicting sensory information can further elevate the attentional demands required for maintaining postural control, potentially increasing the risk of falls. These situations are common in daily activities like crossing streets while talking or carrying groceries, highlighting the heightened fall risk for older adults.

Declaration of Funding

Declaration of Funding

Disclosure Statement

There are no financial conflicts of interest to disclose. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethics Statement

This article is a literature review, with no new empirical data collected from human participants or animals. Therefore, ethical approval was not sought.

Author Contributions

SG and DS contributed to the first draft of the paper equally. SG and DS revised it critically for intellectual content. All authors gave final approval of the version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Submission Statement

We represent that this submission is original work and is not under consideration for publication with any other journal.

Acknowledgment

None.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing does not apply to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

References

  1. Woollacott M, Shumway Cook A (2002) Attention and the control of posture and gait: A review of an emerging area of research. Gait and Posture 16(1): 1-14.
  2. Lajoie Y, Teasdale N, Bard C, Fleury M (1996) Upright standing and gait: Arethere changes in attentional requirements related to normal aging? ExperimentalAging Research 22(2): 85-198.
  3. Melzer I, Benjuya N, Kaplanski J (2001) Age-related changes of postural control: Effect of cognitive tasks. Gerontology 47(4): 189-194.
  4. Berger L, Bernard Demanze L (2011) Age-related effects of a memorizing spatialtask in the adults and elderly postural control. Gait and Posture 33(2): 300-302.
  5. Stelmach GE, Zelaznik HN, Lowe D (1990) The influence of aging and attentional demands on recovery from postural instability. Aging 2(2): 155-161.
  6. Allison LK, Fuller K (2007) Balance and vestibular disorders. In: U. Darcy (Edt.)., Neurological rehabilitation (5th )., St Louis, Missouri: Mosby Elsevier, pp. 732-774.
  7. Wojick LA, Thelen DG, Schultz AB, Ashton Miller JA, Alexander NB, et al. (1999) Age and gender differences in single-step recovery from a forward fall. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Science and Medical Sciences 54(1): M44-50.
  8. Mille ME, Rogers MW, Martinez K, Hedman LD, Johnson ME, et al. (2003) Thresholds for inducing protective stepping responses to external perturbations of human standing. Journal of Neurophysiology 90(2): 666-674.
  9. Melzer I, Oddsson LI (2004) The effect of a cognitive task on voluntary step execution in healthy elderly and young individuals. Journal of American Geriatrics Society 52(8): 1255-1262.
  10. Brown LA, Shumway Cook A, Woollacott MH (1999) Attentional demands and postural recovery: The effect of aging. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Science and Medical Sciences 54(4): M165-171.
  11. Zettel JL, McIlroy WE, Maki BE (2008) Effect of competing attentional demands on perturbation-evoked stepping reactions and associated gaze behavior in young and older adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Science and Medical Sciences 63(12): 1370-1379.
  12. Lindenberger U, Marsiske M, Baltes PB (2000) Memorizing while walking: Increase in dual-task costs from young adulthood to old age. Psychology and Aging 15(3): 417-436.
  13. Li K, Lindenberger U, Freund AM, Baltes PB (2001) Walking while memorizing: Age-related differences in compensatory behavior. Psychological Science 12(3): 230-237.
  14. Hollman JH, Kovash FM, Kubik JJ, Linbo RA (2007) Age-related differences in spatiotemporal markers of gait stability during dual task walking. Gait and Posture 26(1): 113-119.
  15. Priest AW, Salamon KB, Hollman JH (2008) Age-related differences in dual task walking: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Neuro Engineering and Rehabilitation 5: 29.
  16. Chen HC, Schultz AB, Ashton Miller JA, Giordani B, Alexander NB, et al. (1996) Stepping over obstacles: Dividing attention impairs performance of old more than young adults. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Science and Medical Sciences 51(3): M116-122.
  17. Schrodt LA, Mercer VS, Giuliani CA, Hartman M (2004) Characteristics of stepping over an obstacle in community dwelling older adults under dual-task conditions. Gait and Posture 19(3): 279-287.
  18. Kerr B, Condon SM, McDonald LA (1985) Cognitive spatial processing and the regulation of posture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 11(5): 617-622.
  19. Shumway Cook A, Brauer S, Woollacott M (2000) Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the timed up and go test. Physical Therapy 80(9): 896-903.
  20. Yardley L, Gardner M, Leadbetter A, Lavie N (1999) Effect of articulatory and mental tasks on postural control. Neuroreport 10(2): 215-219.
  21. Lundin Olsson L, Nyberg L, Gustafson Y (1997) “Stops walking when talking “as a predictor of falls in elderly people. The Lancet 349(9052): 617.
  22. Dault MC, Yardley L, Frank JS (2003) Does articulation contribute to modifications of postural control during dual-task paradigms? Cognitive Brain Research 16(3): 434-440.
  23. Maylor EA, Wing AM (1996) Age differences in postural stability are increased by additional cognitive demands. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences 51(3): P143-154.
  24. Sparrow WA, Bradshaw EJ, Lamoureux E, Tirosh O (2002) Ageing effects on the attention demands of walking. Human Movement Science 21(5-6): 961–972
  25. Bock O (2008) Dual-task costs while walking increase in old age for some, but not for other tasks: an experimental study of healthy young and elderly persons. Journal of Neuro Engineering and Rehabilitation 5: 27.
  26. Jamet M, Deviterne D, Gauchard GC, Vancon G, Perrin PP, et al. (2004) Highervisual dependency increases balance control perturbation during cognitive task fulfillment in elderly people. Neuroscience Letters 359(1-2): 61-64.
  27. Dault MC, Frank JS, Allard F (2001) Influence of a visuo-spatial, verbal and central executive working memory task on postural control. Gait and Posture 14(2): 110-116.
  28. Beauchet O, Dubost V, Herrmann FR, Kressig RW (2005) Stride-to-stride variability while backward counting among healthy young adults. Journal of Neuro Engineering and Rehabilitation 2: 26.
  29. Redfern MS, Muller ML, Jennings JR, Furman JM (2002) Attentional dynamics in postural control during perturbations in young and older adults. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Science and Medical Sciences 57(8): B298-303.
  30. Horak FB, Nashner LM, Diener HC (1990) Postural strategies associated with somatosensory and vestibular loss. Experimental Brain Research 82(1): 167-177.
  31. Lord SR, Ward JA (1994) Age-associated differences in sensori-motor function and balance in community dwelling women. Age and Ageing 23(6): 452-460.
  32. Jeka J, Oie KS, Kiemel T (2000) Multisensory information for human postural control: Integrating touch and vision. Experimental Brain Research 134(1): 107-125.
  33. Oie KS, Kiemel T, Jeka J (2002) Multisensory fusion: simultaneous reweighting of vision and touch for the control of human posture. Cognitive Brain Research 14(1): 164-176.f
  34. Teasdale N, Bard C, LaRue J, Fleury M (1993) On the cognitive penetrability of posture control. Experimental Aging Research 19(1): 1-13.
  35. Shumway Cook A, Woolacott M, Kerns KA, Baldwin M (1997) Effects of two types of cognitive tasks on postural stability in older adults with and with outa history of falls. Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Science and Medical Sciences c52A(4): M232-240.
  36. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott M (2000) Attentional demands and postural control: The effect of sensory context. Journals of Gerontology Series A:Biological Science and Medical Sciences 55(1): M10-16.
  37. Redfern MS, Jennings JR, Martin C, Furman JM (2001) Attention influences sensory integration for postural control in older adults. Gait and Posture 14(3): 211-216.
  38. Paul S, Ada L, Canning C (2005) Automaticity of walking: Implications for physiotherapy practice. Physical Therapy Reviews 10(1): 15-23.