+1 (502) 904-2126   One Westbrook Corporate Center, Suite 300, Westchester, IL 60154, USA   Site Map
ISSN: 2574 -1241

Impact Factor : 0.548

  Submit Manuscript

Mini ReviewOpen Access

Allograft Model for Disease Monitoring and Therapeutics Volume 49- Issue 3

Sandhiya V1* and Senthil Kumaran K2*

  • 1Assistant professor, Department of pharmaceutics, C.L.baid metha college of pharmacy, India
  • 2Professor and head of pharmaceutics, K K College of pharmacy, India

Received: March 02, 2023;   Published: March 24, 2023

*Corresponding author: Sandhiya V, Department of pharmaceutics, K K College of pharmacy, Chennai, India

DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2023.49.007796

Abstract PDF


Ehrlich ascites carcinoma (EAC), one of the most prevalent malignancies, is extremely important for modelling. EAC, also known as an undifferentiated carcinoma, is initially hyperdiploid, highly transplantable, never regresses, proliferates quickly, has a shorter life span, and is completely malignant. It also lacks the tumorspecific transplantation antigen (TSTA). Often, the proliferation rate of these tumours develops gradually as the virulence of the tumour increases via repeated passages. However, the differentiation gradually vanishes as the cells acquire free growth control systems, increase their hetero-transplantability, and ultimately take on the appearance of ascites. Due to its undifferentiated nature and quick rate of proliferation, EAC resembles human cancers, which are the most susceptible to treatment. At this stage, the utilization of natural sources as an alternative cancer therapy is regarded to have considerable value for cancer control and the destruction of cancer programmes because the optimal medicine has been focused on and has been shown to be inefficient or minimally beneficial for normal cells.

Keywords: Ascites Carcinoma; Undifferentiated Cells

Abbreviations: EAC: Ehrlich Ascites Carcinoma; ATCC: American Type Culture Collection; TSTA: Tumor- Specific Transplantation Antigen


Experimental animals are used as transplantation models for tissues or cells of spontaneous or artificially produced carcinomas. The models are separated into graft and heterograft according to the transplant supply, with the latter necessitating immunodeficient mice. The two types of transplantations are orthotopic and attitude transplantations [1], and the latter is further split into hypodermic transplantation, tail vein injection to induce metastasis in the respiratory organs, and left cavity injection to induce metastasis in the bone and brain. Associate in Nursing intraductal route of transplantation is regarded as a superior alternative to exocrine gland fat pad transplantation for orthotopic transplantation. The pathological milieu for carcinoma cells will be improved by intraductal transplantation, although fewer cancer cells are injected, and the procedure is technically challenging. Currently, the transplantation model, particularly the human heterograft type, is the most widely used animal model for testing novel treatments. Short cycles, low costs, minute variations, and rapid rates of tumour growth are advantages of the transplanting paradigm.

Allograft Models

Transplanting spontaneous or induced cancer cell lines into a genetic strain with conventional immunological function. There are numerous established mobile animal cancer cell lines, the majority of which are generated from mice [2]. Strict germline specificity governs the use of cancer cell lines for allogeneic transplantation. Uncommonly used mouse-derived carcinoma cell lines include MVT1, 6DT1, and M6 from FVB mice, as well as 4T1, EMT6, TM40, and D2A1 from BALB/c mice. The majority of mouse cell lines are from inbred and genetically modified mice with spontaneous breast cancers. The BALB/c-derived 4T1 model is one of them, and it may be a significant mobile mouse carcinoma model for testing anti-cancer drugs and identifying tumour and host-derived variables associated with spontaneous metastasis to the lung, brain, bone, and alternative organs.

Another internal secretion receptor-negative mouse breast tumour cell line obtained from BALB/c is EMT6. This model is frequently used to screen and evaluate pre-clinical anti-tumor therapy due to its short latency. Ehrlich pathologic malignant neoplastic illness (EAC) may also be a spontaneous mouse exocrine gland cancer spread by repeated intraperitoneal passages in exogamic mice. EAC is a form of undifferentiated malignant neoplasm with a quick rate of growth in remission and sensitivity to chemotherapy.

Ehrlich Pathology Malignant Neoplastic Disease

The tumour, which came to be known as the Ehrlich cell, was grown in vivo. Ehrlich cultures start to emerge around research centers all over the world in 1948. The Ehrlich cell spread because in vivo passage may well cause it to enlarge. Because of this, it was useful for organic chemistry experiments involving large numbers of tissues. It might even be kept in vitro for numerous well planned trials [3]. Mice passage in large-scale culture techniques is less interesting since the tumour is contaminated by a variety of host inflammatory cells. Ehrlich’s «Strain 7» mobile mouse malignant neoplasm, which was most likely of exocrine gland origin, was used to create Ehrlich cells, also known as Ehrlich-Lettre pathology malignant neoplastic illness, which were first developed as Associate in Nursing pathology tumour of mice. The early triple-crown attempts at tissue culture involved hanging drop preparations that were passaged for twelve years . Numerous other laboratories have since grown Ehrlich’s cells, but Strain E of the Ehrlich-Lettre pathology is the cell line that has been utilized most frequently and is stored in the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) repository as ATCC CCL-77. These cells were grown as a monolayer from a tumour in NCTC 109 that was 7 days old. 100% calf blood serum-based medium that was subcultured by scraping. The culture that was submitted to ATCC has been kept alive during a later modification of NCTC 109, NCTC 135 with craniate calf blood serum added. In vitro population doubling times for Strain E range from 20 to 24 hours and from 14 to 16 hours [4]. The strain that was most likely sent to the ATCC is strain E, which was created through alternate in vitro and in vivo passages and adapts chop-chop to culture after in vivo passage. The cells have a hyperdiploid compose with unique body, metacentric, and minute markers, and have a tendency to have a cigar-shaped morphology in vitro, which suggests Associate in Nursing undifferentiated constitution. The Ehrlich pathology spread because it could be multiplied via in vivo passage, which made it useful for organic chemistry research involving enormous amounts of tissue. However, it could still be maintained in vitro for many physiologically regulated studies. Pathology passage has become less engaging with the introduction of large-scale cell culture techniques that will produce 10M01Z cells. This is due to the contamination of the tumour with a variety of host inflammatory cells and the ensuing development of legislation restricting the use of pathology tumours.

Properties of EAC

EAC, also known as undifferentiated carcinoma, is hyper-diploid at first. The water permeability is at its peak at the start of the S phase and gradually declines to its lowest point right after mitosis [5]. During the cell cycle, activation temperatures for water permeability fluctuate and range from 9 to 14 kcal/mole.

Transplantation of EAC to Mice Model

In the cavum of mice, EAC cells proliferate in suspension and do not adhere to the in vitro artificial surface. Pathology fluid is produced and a total of 5-12l pathology fluid is accumulated in four or a halfdozen days of passage. EAC cells proliferate in two phases after being injected into the cavum of mice. There are two phases that make up this process: a proliferating period during which the number of cells will expand rapidly, and an upland phase followed by a resting phase during which the variety of cells will remain essentially constant. Numerous studies claimed that nine days after the 3 x 106 EAC cells were transplanted intraperitoneally [6], the number of cells doubled exponentially and spread from the ninth and tenth days are when the exponential component transitions to the highland part. In a different study, the EAC cells’ rate of proliferation was divided into four phases. These phases are: a power phase lasting four to five days after the intraperitoneal transplantation of tumour cells; an upland phase where the number of cells remained largely constant from day five to day thirteen; an impermanent proliferating phase from day thirteen to day fifteen; and a second upland phase from day fifteen to day eighteen. Except for alterations in cell kinetics, the EAC cells undergo morphological and metabolic changes as they go from the proliferative section to the upland part, including structural degeneration and weakening. various mitochondria weaker macromolecule synthesis, decreased ATP concentration and turnover, loss of living thing purine and pirimidine nucleotides, nucleosides, and bases, increased deoxythymidine concentration with decreased deoxythymidine enzyme activity reduced levels of glutathione (GSH) and increased levels of free fatty acids, triglycerides, and cholesterin esters [7].

The down-regulator body substance components and an inclination of the inhibited macrophages were strongly suggested to be related to the inhibition of NK Associate in Nursingd lymphocyte responses. Through rapid cell proliferation in the proliferative portion and the load cavum, EAC cells multiplied in number. Accumulation of pathological fluid happened concurrently with the growth of tumour cells. The host animal passed away at a specific time as a result of the pressure. Exerted by the size of the tumour and/or the damage the tumour caused. The rates of cell viability didn’t significantly drop as the EAC cells moved from the proliferating region to the upland part. Finally, vessels in the cavum of mice with EAC demonstrated that the microvascular porosity significantly increased in comparison to those of the management cluster, suggesting that the cancer cells may release a tube porosity issue that stimulates the building of pathological fluid. A pathological fluid with good porosity considerations was able to identify this increased porosity, but not in the normal blood serum or plasma.

Animal Model Advantage in Drug Development

Animal models are used in research on the biology of carcinoma and the efficacy of contemporary treatments. Prior to usage in humans, proposed medications’ safety and efficacy are mostly predicted using diagnostic animal models. Animal models for carcinoma are useful in a variety of other contexts and continue to further our knowledge of disease development, therapeutic response, and resistance mechanisms. Rarely are spontaneous and induced carcinoma models used in routine anti-tumor drug screening. Transgenic models and transplanting are currently the most popular. GEMMs and heterograft models are frequently used to clarify the underlying mechanisms of drug resistance, the pathological process of cancer and metastasis, and the efficacy and toxicity of medications. Current cancer medicines support receptor standing. In the treatment of breast cancer, individualized medicine has had great success. Antiestrogens (like antagonist and fulvestrant), aromatase inhibitors (like letrozole and anastrozole), CDK4/6 inhibitors (like palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib), and PI3K inhibitors are often utilised targeted treatments for ER-positive pathological process carcinoma. Trastuzumab and pertuzumab are the most efficient medications for HER2-positive cancer patients. Anthracyclines, taxanes, and Pt are commonly used to treat TNBC patients, as well as targeted therapies such PARP inhibitors (e.g., olaparib and talazoparib) for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and anti-PD-L1 mAb (e.g., atezolizumab) for PDL1- positive patients. For drug effectiveness investigation, biomarker identification, and resistance analysis, several cancer animal models are utilized.


Mice continue to be the most popular animal species. The use of mice models for cancer has tremendously aided analysis, prognosis, clinical drug screening, and the development of new cancer treatments, notably for research on the processes of cancer metastasis and the subsequent creation of targeted drugs. In the future, it will be important and worthwhile to use different species. In this regard, tree shrews have excellent intelligence.


Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate

For this study prior clearance from an institutional animal ethics committee ( ) was obtained and the experimental procedure followed CPCSEA guidelines.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Availability of Data and Material

All data and materials are available upon carried out by authors.


The authors are grateful to the management, for the facilities. This publication is a part of Ph.D Thesis of The TamilnaduDr.M.G.R. Medical University, Chennai, Tamilnadu, India.

Competing Interests

No conflict of interest from authors.


Not applicable.


  1. Haris WJ, Meyskens F, Patt MH (1970) Biochemical Studies of Cytokinetic Changes During Tumor Growth. Cancer Res 30(7): 1937- 1946.
  2. Park MK, Lee CH, Lee H (2018) Mouse models of breast cancer in preclinical research. Laboratory Animal Research 34(4): 160-165.
  3. Clarke AR (2000) Manipulating the germline: its impact on the study of carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis 21(3): 435-441.
  4. Nutter F, Holen I, Brown HK, Cross SS, Evans CA, et al. (2014) Different molecular profiles are associated with breast cancer cell homing compared with colonisation of bone: evidence using a novel bone-seeking cell line. Endocrine-Related Cancer 21(2): 327-341.
  5. Andersson G, Heby O (1972) Polyamine and nucleic acid concentrations in Ehrlich ascites carcinoma cells and liver of tumor-bearing mice at various stages of tumor growth. J nat Cancer Inst 48(1): 165-172.
  6. Bichel P (1971) Autoregulation of ascites tumour growth by inhibition of the G-1 and the G-2 phase. Europ J Cancer 7(4): 349-355.
  7. Baserga R, Wiebel F (1969) The growth of tumor cells under normal and fasting conditions. Recent Results Cancer Res 17: 118-127.