Opinion
We are currently witnessing a global pandemic, caused by a virus
that originated in a Chinese city and then spread throughout the
planet, wreaking havoc of enormous magnitude and intensity. The
global catastrophe generated by the new Coronavirus or COVID-19
allows us to clearly observe the dire effects of neoliberal ideology. For
decades, the broadcasters and spokesmen of neoliberal capitalism
stigmatized the Social Welfare State and the public sector as guilty
of all the ills of society, while exalting the alleged benefits of the free
market and the supposed intrinsic superiority of private initiative.
The viral expansion of neoliberal ideas in the public sphere insisted
over and over that the state was essentially corrupt and inefficient,
that public spending caused fiscal deficits and inflation, and that
state planning created bureaucratic obstacles, interfered with
individual liberties, and threatened against legal certainty. The
solution, for neoliberalism, was to reduce the regulatory functions
of the State, abandon distributive and universalist policies, reduce
public and social spending and let the efficiency of the business
world and the competition of the private sector take care of selfregulation
and correctly manage the public. In this way, the free
market would be able to properly allocate resources, promote
economic growth and, by spontaneous derivation, achieve a future
of social welfare for all.
The individualistic, economistic and utilitarian ideology of neoliberalism
tried to make us believe that the only valid rationality
was the instrumental rationality of homoeconomus, that private
egoism was the best way to achieve public virtues, that collective
solidarity was anti-natural, that social justice was a chimera and
that the world was reduced to a set of isolated individuals in
permanent competition with each other. Within the framework
of this hegemonic operation, the broadcasters and spokesmen of
neoliberal capitalism justified the application of economic policies
of State Reform, through the privatization and commodification of
public and common goods, the opening and deregulation of trade
and finance, the “flexibilization” of the labor market, the fiscal
adjustment (“austerity”) of public spending on health, education,
infrastructure and social security, and even (in peripheral countries)
also on science and technology.
In the last decades, the application at the state level of neoliberal
public policies generated a huge increase in the concentration
of income and the centralization of Capital in a few hands, the
destruction of a large part of industrial SMEs and national production
linked to the internal market. In addition, the precariousness
of work, poverty and unemployment increased exponentially,
prompting the rupture of the bonds of social solidarity between the
workers, the destruction of the environment and the degradation of
biodiversity. The world coronavirus catastrophe shows, once again,
the ethical-political limits of the neoliberal accumulation model
and its perverse logic of unlimited maximization of private profit.
At the same time, it again brings to the fore the centrality of the
State and its public policies in defense of public health, innovative
scientific-technological development, care for the environment and
protection of the basic social rights of citizens.
In contrast to what neoliberal capitalism proclaims, Public
Health cannot be understood as a private business based on economic profitability, but rather constitutes a political obligation
of the State to guarantee an essential public service and a basic
and inalienable social and human right . This implies that the State
cannot in any way delegate said central function in the market
and its narrow economical logic of maximizing private profits.
It also implies that wages cannot be understood as a “cost” that
must be reduced. On the contrary, the State must guarantee to all
the workers of the Public Health salaries commensurate with the
importance of their work and their responsibility in social and
human development. The pandemic also shows us that Science
and Technology are not a superfluous expense. On the contrary,
the sustained investment of the State in Science and Technology
constitutes a basic pillar to promote productive development and
social inclusion. Finally, the humanitarian tragedy alerts us to the
State’s obligation to implement regulatory public market policies
to care for the environment and preserve biodiversity. In Argentina,
following the experiences of the Menemism and the Alliance, the
government of Cambiemos (2015-2019) was in charge of spreading
in the public sphere the neoliberal logic of selfish individualism,
savage competition and whoever saves himself, seasoned with a
account of meritocracy and entrepreneurship. At the same time,
it did not hesitate to apply public policies of a neoliberal nature,
aimed at reducing essential functions and eroding the technical
capacities of the State. On the one hand, Cambiemos decided to turn
the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Science and Technology
into Secretariats, lowering their rank and degrading these vital
areas.
On the other hand, the ruling alliance decided to apply a policy of strong downward adjustment in public and social investment in health, science and technology, which de-defined these areas, under-executed scientific projects, cut wages of the workers / It is and reduced technical and professional staff of excellence.
Lean Underfunding and Adjustment Measures
Wages of the public workers of the Malbrán Institute, CONICET
and INTA - while the Macri government promoted the financial
timba with high interest rates and borrowed heavily from creditors
to support capital flight from concentrated groups of the economy
- they reveal the perversity of neoliberal ideology. The increase in
the levels of poverty, marginality, job insecurity and unemployment
inherited from the Cambiemos government, show its dire social
consequences. Macrism, in addition, accentuated from the Kirchner
stage an extractivist model focused on agribusiness and megamining
at scale, which generated disastrous effects on afforestation
and care for the environment, biodiversity and human health. Let
us hope that the tragic humanitarian crisis allows opinion leaders
and the general public to reflect in depth on the dire effects of
neoliberal ideology. The current world catastrophe must contribute
to revaluing the fundamental importance of collective solidarity
against selfish individualism; and the unrestricted defense of public
and common goods and basic social services, against the mercantile
logic of unlimited maximization of private profit, naturalized by
neoliberalism.
We also hope that it helps to become aware of the indispensable
importance of betting on sustained public and social investment in
Health, Science and Technology to promote productive innovation
and economic and social development. In this framework, we hope
that the catastrophe manages to generate a collective consensus on
the crucial role of the Social State and its non-delegable political
obligation to actively regulate the market, promote the development
of the national scientific-technological system, safeguard public
health and care for the environment. , protect work and guarantee
decent living conditions for the effective fulfillment of the basic
social and human rights of its inhabitants.