Harmonizing the CD4 Threshold for Initiating Toxoplasmosis Prophylaxis in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Volume 13 - Issue 2

Folusakin Ayoade*

• Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious diseases, USA

Received:January 01, 2019;   Published:January 18, 2019

*Corresponding author: Folusakin Ayoade, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious diseases,1120 NW 14TH Street, Miami, FL 33136, USA

DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2019.13.002378

Abstract PDF

Toxoplasmosis is one of the commonest causes of morbidity and mortality in severely compromised HIV patients and prophylaxis is often recommended. Going by several United States management guidelines, the CD4 lymphocyte cut off to start toxoplasmosis prophylaxis is below 100 cells/μL. This threshold may need to be raised to 200 cells/μL as extensive toxoplasmic encephalitis is increasingly described in HIV patients with CD4 lymphocyte counts between 100 and 200 cells/μL. The suggested adjustment in the CD4 count threshold will offer protection to more at-risk population and bring the US guidelines in harmony with the European guidelines

Keywords: Toxoplasmosis; Prophylaxis; CD4; HIV; Guidelines

Toxoplasmosis is the most common infectious cause of focal brain lesions in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and it is often associated with significant morbidity and mortality [1]. Toxoplasma gondii, the causative agent is an intracellular protozoan parasite with worldwide distribution. The local disease incidence however is closely linked to toxoplasma seropositivity in any given population [2]. Seropositivity of toxoplasmosis in HIV infected patients has been shown to be high and prophylaxis is generally recommended for immunocompromised HIV patients who have positive toxoplasma immunoglobulin G [3]. Toxoplasmosis in HIV infected patients is commonly seen when the CD4 lymphocyte count falls below 100 cells/μL and in many patients, CD4 counts are often below 50 cells/μL [4]. Not every HIV patient with reactivation toxoplasmosis however presents with very low CD4 counts. While approximately 75% of patients will have CD4 counts less than 100 cells/μL at the time of presentation, 90% or more will have CD4 counts below 200 cells/μL.

Table 1: Adpated from NIH/HIVMA/IDSA (US guidelines) on preventing Toxoplasma gondi encephalitis in HIV positive adults and adolescents.

Recommendations from major United States health organizations including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and the HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (HIVMA) [5] suggest providing toxoplasmosis prophylaxis in toxoplasma seropositive individuals only when the CD4 lymphocyte count falls below 100 cells/μL (Table 1). This recommendation leaves as many as 25% of toxoplasma seropositive HIV patients at risk who can develop toxoplasmic encephalitis at CD4 count above 100 cells/μL. In contrast to the American guidelines, the European guidelines [6] favor starting toxoplasmosis prophylaxis when the CD4 count falls below 200 cells/μL (Table 2). Some observations support the possibility of extensive cerebral toxoplasmosis at higher CD4 counts (above 100 cells/μL) either in newly diagnosed toxoplasma seropositive HIV patients or those already established on antiretroviral therapy [7,8].

Table 2: Adapted from the European AIDS Clinical Society Guidelines on primary prophylaxis of opportunistic Infections in HIV.

HIV patients with CD4 counts between 100 and 200 cells/ μL have substantially increased risk of developing toxoplasmic encephalitis than those with CD4 counts greater than 400 cells/ μL [9]. This group of patients with relatively higher CD4 counts (between 100 and 200 cells/μL) would not have been started on definitive toxoplasmosis prophylaxis going by the United States (US) guidelines. It is reasonable to say that effective antiretroviral therapy and widespread pneumocystis prophylaxis in HIV patients who have CD4 counts less than 200 cells/μL have minimized toxoplasmosis reactivation. In all fairness, one may argue that at CD4 counts between 100 and 200 cells/μL, most HIV patients will typically be on some form of pneumocystis prophylaxis which will also be protective against toxoplasmosis [10,11]. Going by this argument, in the setting of appropriate adherence to antiretroviral therapy, definitive need for additional toxoplasmosis prophylaxis may be less important. The problem with this viewpoint is that US providers who abide strictly by the US guidelines may not initiating toxoplasma prophylaxis until CD4 counts falls well below 100 cells/ μL.

In the same vein, in patients allergic to sulfamethoxazole/ trimethoprim, the most prescribed and most effective prophylactic agent for pneumocystis [12], additional agents such as pyrimethamine and atovaquone is often needed to provide adequate prophylaxis against both pneumocystis and toxoplasma infections [6,13,14]. Using the current US guidelines, adequate prophylaxis may therefore be compromised when the CD4 counts falls between 100 - 200 cells/μL for this cohort. Clinical symptoms of opportunistic infections including toxoplasmosis have been known to develop or become unmasked shortly after initiation of antiretroviral therapy. This is partly related to the restoration of the immune system in a previously immunosuppressed patient [15]. In addition, appropriate immune reconstitution may be delayed or inadequate in some patients on HIV treatment, due to erratic compliance with antiretroviral therapy or due to the development of drug resistance. All these factors suggest HIV viremia and suboptimal CD4 counts are good possibilities even in the treatment experienced patients.

The need for prophylaxis against appropriate opportunistic infections, based on the degree of immunosuppression is therefore still justified [16]. My suggestion is that the US guidelines should be reviewed and possibly amended by changing the threshold for initiating toxoplasmosis prophylaxis from 100 cells/μL to 200 cells/ μL [9]. The updated NIH and HIVMA guidelines on opportunistic infections in HIV patients underscore the fact that the risks of acquiring toxoplasma encephalitis at CD4 counts between 100-200 cells/μL have not been rigorously studied [5]. Is it possible that the current US toxoplasmosis prophylaxis recommendation may be too narrow or restrictive? Is it possible that we may be leaving a fair number of HIV patients from areas of high toxoplasma seropositivity at risk of disease reactivation? I will also suggest that more research be directed at this group of HIV patients with CD4 counts between 100-200 cells/μL with respect to toxoplasmosis prophylaxis. In the meantime, it is probably reasonable to keep the message simple by harmonizing the recommendations for primary prophylaxis for both pneumocystis and toxoplasmosis at the same CD4 cut off. This will provide prophylactic coverage to more patients at risk including those with sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim allergy and avoid a false sense of security for providers.

1. Luft BJ, Chua A (2000) Central Nervous System Toxoplasmosis in HIV Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Therapy. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2(4): 358-362.
2. Belanger F, Derouin F, Grangeot Keros L, Meyer L (1999) Incidence and risk factors of toxoplasmosis in a cohort of human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients: 1988 -1995. HEMOCO and SEROCO Study Groups. Clin Infect Dis 28(3): 575-581.
3. Daryani A, Sharif M, Meigouni M (2011) Seroprevalence of IgG and IgM anti-Toxoplasma antibodies in HIV/AIDS patients, northern Iran. Asian Pac J Trop Med 4(4): 271-274.
4. Bossi P, Caumes E, Astagneau P Li TS (1998) Epidemiologic characteristics of cerebral toxoplasmosis in 399 HIV-infected patients followed between 1983 and 1994. Rev Med Interne 19(5): 313-317.
5. Masur H, Brooks JT, Benson C, Holmes KH, Pau A, et al. (2014) Prevention and Treatment of Opportunistic Infections in HIV-Infected Adults and Adolescents: Updated Guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institutes of Health, and HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 58(9): 1308-1311.
6. (2016) European AIDS Clinical Society Guidelines. English Version 8.1.
7. Ayoade F, Todd J, Al Delfi F, King J (2017) Extensive brain masses and cavitary lung lesions associated with toxoplasmosis and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Int J STD AIDS 28(11): 1150-1154.
8. Atreya AR, Arora S, Gadiraju VT, Martagon Villamil J, Skiest DJ (2014) Toxoplasma encephalitis in an HIV-infected patient on highly active antiretroviral therapy despite sustained immune response. Int J STD AIDS 25(5): 383-386.
9. Nascimento LV, Stollar F, Tavares LB, Cavasini CE, Maia IL, et al. (2001) Risk factors for toxoplasmic encephalitis in HIV-infected patients: a casecontrol study in Brazil. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 95(6): 587-593.
10. Garvey L, Winston A, Walsh J, Post F, Porter K, et al. (2011) HIVassociated central nervous system diseases in the recent combination antiretroviral therapy era. UK Collaborative HIV Cohort (CHIC) Study Steering Committee, Eur J Neurol 18(3): 527-534.
11. Aberg J, Powderly W (2010) HIV: primary and secondary prophylaxis for opportunistic infections. BMJ Clin Evid 2010: 0908.
12. Cheever LW, Chaisson RE, Gallant JE (1996) Prophylaxis against opportunistic infections in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. West J Med 165(1-2): 67-73.
13. Kaplan JE, Benson C, Holmes KK, Brooks JT, Pau A, et al. (2016) Guidelines for the prevention and treatment of opportunistic infections in HIVinfected adults and adolescents: recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institutes of Health, and the HIV Medicine Association of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. MMWR Recomm Rep 58(RR-4): 1-207.
14. Morlat P, Leport C (1997) Prevention of toxoplasmosis in immunocompromised patients. Ann Med Interne (Paris) 148(3): 235- 239.
15. Rodríguez Rosado R, Soriano V, Dona C, González Lahoz J (1998) Opportunistic infections shortly after beginning highly active antiretroviral therapy. Antivir Ther 3(4): 229-231.
16. Rajapakse S, Weeratunga P, Rodrigo C, De Silva NL, Fernando SD (2017) Prophylaxis of human toxoplasmosis: a systematic review. Pathog Glob Health 111(7): 333-342.