Glioblastoma: Equilibrium and Interconversion Between Tumor Non-Stem Cells and Tumor Stem Cells Volume 8 - Issue 4

Davide Schiffer¹, Marta Mellai², Cristiano Corona³, Cristina Casalone³* and Laura Annovazzi

• ¹Professor Emeritus of Neurology, University of Turin, Italy
• ²Department of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Italy
• ³Istituto Zooprofilattico del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle d’Aosta, Italy
• ⁴Former Research Center/Policlinico di Monza Foundation, Italy

Received: August 21, 2018;   Published: September 04, 2018

*Corresponding author: Cristina Casalone VD, Head of the Neuropathology Laboratory, Istituto Zooprofilattico del Piemonte, Liguria e Valle d'Aosta, Via Bologna 148, 10154 Turin, Italy

DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2018.08.001680

Abstract PDF

The problem of the location of glioblastoma (GB) stem cells (GSCs) and of their relationship with the microenvironment is discussed. Also in our experience, they are located in perivascular and perinecrotic niches. In the latter, as an alternative hypothesis to their origin by hypoxia through Hypoxia Inducible Factor 1, they could represent the remnants of stem cells/progenitors that populate the highly proliferative areas of GB where necrosis develops in avascular zones due to the imbalance between the high proliferation rate of tumor cells and the low one of endothelial cells. On the whole, tumor stem cells and tumor non-stem cells are in equilibrium between differentiation and stemness, regulated by the microenvironment with the possibility of an interconversion of the cell statuses.

Abbreviations: CSCs: Cancer Stem Cells; NSCs: Neural Stem Cells; GB: Glioblastoma; GSCs: Glioblastoma Stem Cells; OPCs: Oligodendroglial Precursor Cells; NG2: Neuron Antigen Glia 2

One of the most credited hypotheses on tumorigenesis is the origin of tumors from cancer stem cells (CSCs). These would be at the top of a cell hierarchy and responsible for growth, recurrence and resistance to therapies. There would be an equilibrium between CSCs and cancer non-stem cells through an interconversion from one to another [1]. The cell heterogeneity of malignant tumors would be, therefore, associated with a cell plasticity in which the bidirectional conversion would be modulated by specific microenvironmental signals arising in the tumor niches [2]. The interconversion hypothesis would reconcile the clonal evolution model with the hierarchical/cancer stem cell model [3]. It must be remembered that the tumor microenvironment is organized in niches where CSCs and mesenchymal stem/stromal cells are hosted and represent a target for therapies [4]. In gliomas, the stem cell hypothesis is a widely followed one. One of the first relevant observations was that the rat non-invasive normal neural stem cells (NSCs) become invasive if expanded with fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) and bone morphogenetic protein (BMP4) and contain Ngfr, Sparc, Snail1, Pdpn and Tnc genes that are co-expressed in glioblastoma (GB) [5].

GB stem cells (GSCs), originating from the transformation of NSCs [6], share proliferation capacity and self-renewal with them and genetic/epigenetic alterations with GB [7]. Generally, with the term GSCs a heterogeneous pool of stem cells and progenitors is indicated, that could originate from stem cells by transformation, or from cancer cells by dedifferentiation [8-10]. GSCs would be a special cell population responsible for tumor growth, recurrence, resistance to radio- and chemotherapy and for the failure of the local tumor control. Recently, also oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs) or so-called neuron antigen glia 2 (NG2)+ cells have been recognized as possible source of gliomas [11-13].

GSCs can increase in the tumor due to the increased symmetric self-renewal division rate or a reprogramming of non-CSCs to CSCs that confers them plasticity [14]. This is what happens after radiotherapy by activation of the DNA damage response [15] with expansion of the (more resistant) quiescent fraction of CSCs as they return to a proliferative status [16]. The CSC self-renewal may turn from asymmetric to symmetric division [15-18] and to a faster cell cycling [15]. The interconversion could be due to chemotherapy with Temozolomide that can shift non-GSCs towards GSCs that become positive for CD133, sex determining region Y-box 2 (SOX2), octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (Oct4) and Nestin [19]. Also epigenetic mechanisms may intervene in the equilibrium by bidirectional regeneration mechanisms of CSCs [1] further confirming the plasticity to the system [20]. The GSC status can be reached by dedifferentiation, mainly through hypoxia [21] or sub-toxic [22] irradiation [23]. We hypothesized that cell dedifferentiation could take place in the most malignant tumor areas under the influence of tumor microenvironment [24] with its crucial perivascular and perinecrotic niches [25].

An immunohistochemical study demonstrated that, in GB, GSCs are characterized by NANOG, spalt like transcription factor 4 (SALL4), SOX2, pSTAT3 expression and low abundance of Oct4 at the protein and mRNA levels that would indicate a stem cell hierarchy (Figure 1) [26].

Figure 1: Immunohistochemistry. A - Glioblastoma hyperproliferative area bordering a circumscribed necrosis; H&E, x400; B - Id, negativity for GFAP that is limited to reactive astrocytes; DAB, x400; C - Intense positivity of Nestin in hyperproliferative area; DAB, x400; D - High Ki-67/MIB-1 labeling index in the same area; DAB, x400; E - Id, Intense SOX2 staining in several tumor cells; DAB, x400; F - Id, SELIL positive tumor cells; DAB, x400; G - Id, IF for CD133 and H - for Musashi-1; x400; Green and Red, respectively.

The whole matter had been long discussed with the conclusion for an interconversion [27]. In our experience, we demonstrated that:

i) in hyperproliferative areas of GB, usually at the border of the central necrosis, the Ki-67/MIB-1 labeling index and vascular density are the highest and circumscribed necroses occur. Most cells are Nestin+, SOX2+, SEL1L+, CD133+ and, therefore, oriented towards the high steps of the hierarchic scale of stemness [28,29];

ii) circumscribed necroses originate, as an alternative to a vessel wall pathology [30,31] with the pseudopalisades due to the cell escaping hypoxia [32], in avascular areas due to the imbalance between the high proliferation rate of tumor cells and the low one of endothelial cells [33]. The location of CSCs at their borders [34] is due to their sparing from the developing necrosis [29,35,36];

iii) not all tumor/vessel structures inside the tumor are a niche; the term should be reserved to those structures in which a direct contact between endothelial cells and GSCs is realized [35];

iv) genetic and epigenetic signaling influences the microenvironment that in turn conditions the GSCs/non-GSCs interconversion (Figure 2) [35,37].

Figure 2: Development of circumscribed necrosis (A). Equilibrium between tumor non-stem cells and tumor stem cells (B).

A review of the entire hierarchy of cells from GSCs to differentiated cells is compared with an ecological system where the microenvironment is remodeled by the cells and by its niches [38].

Everything considered, including hypoxia, microenvironment, epigenetic signaling, etc., it is very likely that in GB, after its origin from "tumor originating cells", an equilibrium is reached from time to time between stemness and differentiation with the consequent interconversion of cells between tumor stem cells/ less differentiated progenitors and tumor non-stem cells and more differentiated progenitors. Obviously, stem cell should be referred to a functional cell status and not to a cell type [39,40]. The awareness of the existence of this possibility could be of help in establishing therapies for GB.

This study was supported by the Grant n. 2016.AAI2705.U3302 from Fondazione Compagnia di San Paolo (Turin, Italy) and by Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Vercelli (Vercelli, Italy).

1. Singh AK, Arya RK, Maheshwari S, Singh A, Meena S, et al. (2014) Tumor heterogeneity and cancer stem cell paradigm; updates in concept, controversies and clinical relevance. Int J Cancer 136(9): 1991-2000.
2. Cabrera MC, Hollingsworth RE, Hurt EM (2015) Cancer stem cell plasticity and tumor hierarchy. World J Stem Cells 7(1): 27-36.
3. Van Neerven SM, Tieken M, Vermeulen L, Bijlsma FM (2016) Bidirectional interconversion of stem and non-stem cancer cell populations: A reassessment of theoretical models for tumor heterogeneity. Mol Cell Oncol 3(2): e1098791.
4. 4. Aponte PM, Caicedo A (2017) Stemness in cancer: stem cells, cancer stem cells, and their microenvironment. Stem Cells Int: 5619472.
5. Sailer MHM, Gerber A, Tostado C, Hutter G, Cordier D, et al. (2013) Non- invasive neural stem cells become invasive in vitro by combined FGF2 and BMP4 signaling. J Cell Sci 126(Pt 16): 3533-3540.
6. Visvader JE, Lindeman GJ (2008) Cancer stem cells in solid tumors: cumulating evidence and unresolved questions. Nat Rev Cancer 8(10): 755-768.
7. Caldera V, Mellai M, Annovazzi L, Piazzi A, Lanotte M, et al. (2011) Antigenic and genotypic similarity between primary glioblastomas and their derived neurospheres. J Oncol: 314962.
8. Assanah M, Lochhead R, Ogden A, Bruce J, Goldman J, et al. (2006) Glial progenitors in adult white matter are driven to form malignant gliomas by platelet-derived growth factor-expressing retroviruses. J Neurosci 26(25): 6781-6790.
9. Charles NA, Holland EC, Gilbertson R, Glass R, Kettenmann H (2012) The brain tumor microenvironment. Glia 59(8): 1169-1180.
10. Tang DG (2012) Understanding cancer stem cell heterogeneity and plasticity. Cell Res 22(3): 457-472.
11. Lindberg N, Kastemar M, Olofsson T, Smits A, Uhrbom L (2009) Oligodendrocyte progenitor cells can act as cell of origin for experimental glioma. Oncogene 28(23): 2266-2275.
12. Persson AI, Petritsch C, Swartling FJ, Itsara M, Sim FJ, et al. (2010) Nonstem cell origin for oligodendroglioma. Cancer Cell 18(6): 669-682.
13. Jiang Y, Uhrbom L (2012) On the origin of glioma. Ups J Med Sci 117(2): 113-121.
14. Gao X, McDonald JT, Naidu M, Hahnfeldt P, Hlatky L (2014) A Proposed Quantitative Index for Assessing the Potential Contribution of Reprogramming to Cancer Stem Cell Kinetics. Stem Cells Int: 249309.
15. Bao S, Wu Q, McLendon RE, Hao Y, Shi Q, et al. (2006) Glioma stem cells promote radioresistance by preferential activation of the DNA damage response. Nature 444(7120): 756-760.
16. Pajonk F, Vlashi E, McBride WH (2010) Radiation resistance of cancer stem cells: the 4 R's of radiobiology revisited. Stem Cells 28(4): 639-648.
17. Dorr W (1997) Three A's of repopulation during fractionated irradiation of squamous epithelia: Asymmetry loss, Acceleration of stem-cell divisions and Abortive divisions. Int J Radiat Biol 72(6): 635-643.
18. Phillips HS, Kharbanda S, Chen R, Forrest WF, Soriano RH, et al. (2006) Molecular subclasses of high-grade gliomas predict prognosis, delineate a pattern of disease progression, and resemble stages in neurogenesis. Cancer Cell 9(3): 157-173.
19. Auffinger B, Tobias AL, Han Y, Lee G, Guo D, et al. (2014) Conversion of differentiated cancer cells into cancer stem-cells in a glioblastoma model after primary chemotherapy. Cell Death Differ 21(7): 1119-1131.
20. Goffart N, Kroonen J, Rogister B (2013) Glioblastoma-initiating cells: relationship with neural stem cells and the microenvironment. Cancers (Basel) 5(3): 1049-1071.
21. Heddleston JM, Li Z, McLendon RE, Hjelmeland AB, Rich JN (2009) The hypoxic microenvironment maintains glioblastoma stem cells and promotes reprogramming towards a cancer stem cell phenotype. Cell Cycle 8(20): 3274-3284.
22. Dahan P, Martinez Gala J, Delmas C, Monferran S, Malric L, et al. (2014) Ionizing radiations sustain glioblastoma cell dedifferentiation to a stem-like phenotype through surviving: possible involvement in radioresistance. Cell Death Dis 5(11): e1543.
23. Friedmann-Morvinski D (2014) Glioblastoma heterogeneity and cancer cell plasticity. Crit Rev Oncog 19(5): 327-336.
24. > Schiffer D, Mellai M, Annovazzi L, Caldera V, Piazzi A, et al. (2014) Stem cell niches in glioblastoma: a neuropathological view. Biomed Res Int: 725921.
25. Schiffer D, Mellai M, Annovazzi L, Casalone C, Cassoni P (2015) Tumor Microenvironment: Perivascular and Perinecrotic Niches in Gliomas. Molecular Considerations and Evolving Surgical Management Issues in the Treatment of Patients with a Brain Tumor”. In: Ed Lee Roy Morgan (Eds.). (1^st edn.), In: Tech, Rjieka, Croatia: pp. 49-82.
26. Bradshaw A, Wickremesekera A, Brasch HD, Chibnall AM, Davis PF, et al. (2016) Cancer Stem Cells in Glioblastoma Multiforme. Front Surg 3: 48.
27. Safa AR, Saadatzadeh MR, Cohen-Gadol AA, Pollok KE, Bijangi- Vishehsaraei K (2015) Glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) epigenetic plasticity and interconversion between differentiated non-GSCs and GSCs. Genes Dis 2(2): 152-163.
28. Annovazzi L, Mellai M, Bisogno I, Spatola A, Bovio E, et al. (2018) Perivascular niches as points of the utmost expression of tumor miceroenvironment. Hematol Med Oncol 2(6): 1-5.
29. Mellai M, Annovazzi L, Boldorini R, Bertero L, Cassoni P, et al. (2018) SEL1L Plays a Major Role in Human Malignant Gliomas. submitted
30. Fischer I, Gagner J-P, Law M, Newcomb EW, Zagzag D (2005) Angiogenesis in gliomas: biology and molecular pathophysiology. Brain Pathol 15(4): 297-310.
31. Hardee ME, Zagzag D (2012) Mechanisms of glioma-associated neovascularization. Am J Pathol 181(4): 1126-1141.
32. Rong Y, Durden DL, Van Meir EG, Brat DJ (2006) 'Pseudopalisading' necrosis in glioblastoma: a familiar morphologic feature that links vascular pathology, hypoxia, and angiogenesis. J Neuropathology Exp Neurol 65(6): 529-539.
33. Schiffer D, Chio A, Giordana MT, Mauro A, Migheli A, et al. (1989) The vascular response to tumor infiltration in malignant gliomas. Morphometric and reconstruction study. Acta Neuropathol 77(4): 369378.
34. Seidel S, Garvalov BK, Wirta V, Von Stechow L, Schanzer A, et al. (2010) A hypoxic niche regulates glioblastoma stem cells through hypoxia inducible factor 2 alpha. Brain 133(Pt 4): 983-995.
35. Schiffer D, Mellai M, Bovio E, Bisogno I, Casalone C, et al. (2018) Glioblastoma niches: from the concept to the phenotypical reality. Neurol Sci.
36. Schiffer D, Annovazzi L, Mazzucco M, Mellai M (2015) The origin of circumscribed necroses and perinecrotic niches in glioblastoma multiforme: An additional hypothesis. Integr Cancer Sci Therap 2(1): 75-78.
37. Schiffer D, Annovazi L, Cassoni P, Valentini MC, Mazzuco M, et al. (2015) Glioblastoma Stem Cells: Conversion or Reprogramming from Tumor Non-Stem Cells? J Stem Cell Res Ther 5(11): 315.
38. Lathia JD, Gallagher J, Myers JT, Li M, Vasanji A, et al. (2011) Direct in vivo evidence for tumor propagation by glioblastoma cancer stem cells. PLoS One 6: e24807.
39. Vescovi AL, Galli R, Reynolds BA (2006) Brain tumour stem cells. Nat Rev Cancer 6(6): 425-436.
40. Schiffer D, Mellai M, Annovazzi L, Piazzi A, Monzeglio O, et al. (2012) Glioblastoma cancer stem cells: basis for a functional hypothesis, Stem Cell Discovery 2(3): 122-131.