Hande Mefkure Ozkaya*
Received: February 13, 2018; Published: February 26, 2018
*Corresponding author: Hande Mefkure Ozkaya, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Okmeydani Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, 34384, Okmeydani, Istanbul, Turkey
DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2018.02.000796
Despite recent advances in treatment of osteoporosis and the availability of new agents bisphosphonates are still the cornerstone of osteoporosis treatment due to their safety, efficacy and relatively reasonable costs. On the other hand, the presence of rare side effects has brought to the agenda that these drugs should be given during limited time periods. The current approach is to perform dynamic risk identification in patients and to determine the type and duration of the treatment accordingly.
Keywords: Biphosphonate; Osteoporosis; Safety
Abbrevations: FIT: Fracture Intervention Trial; BMD: Bone Mineral Density; VERT: The Vertebral Efficacy with Risedronate Therapy; FDA: Food and Drug Administration; FLEX: The Fracture Intervention Trial Long term extension
Fragility fractures due to osteoporosis are seen in approximately 30% of females and 20% of males over the age of 50 [1]. Each fragility fracture increases the risk of re-fracture, more pronounced in males than females. Mortality due to major or recurrent minor fractures is increasing, especially in later ages [2-4]. This risk continues for up to 5 to 10 years after the fracture [3]. Early diagnosis and effective treatment of osteoporosis is therefore important. On the other hand, optimal treatment duration and potential benefits and harms of long-term therapy remain still unknown.
Biphosphonates are widely prescribed therapeutic agents due to their relative low cost, safety data and efficacy. Alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate and zoledronic acid are the main bisphosphonates in use [1,5-7]. Data in regard to fracture reduction of bisphosphonates came mainly of two large, randomized, placebo-controlled trials: the Fracture Intervention Trial (FIT) [8] for alendronate and the Health Outcomes and Reduced Incidence with Once Yearly Zoledronic Acid Pivotal Fracture Trial (HORIZON) [9] for zoledronic acid which both showed an increase in bone mineral density (BMD) and a decrease in fracture risk following 5 years of therapy with alendronate and three years of therapy with zoledronic acid. The Vertebral Efficacy with Risedronate Therapy (VERT) study revealed similar findings for risedronate [10].
Although ibandronate has been shown to reduce vertebral fracture, no data exist in regard to hip fracture reduction risk with Ibandronate use [11]. Despite known efficacy of biphosphonates some concerns about potential side effects, mainly atypical femoral fractures and osteonecrosis of jaw have limited their use during prolonged time periods [1,12,13]. Although the incidence and absolute risk of these side effects is fairly low, the American Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has added a warning sign to the prescription information of bisphosphonates pointing to the fact that optimal treatment duration is not known and each individual patient should be reassessed on the need of ongoing therapy [1]. Many osteoporosis foundation have proposed recommendations and the concept of drug holiday has come to attention [1,7,12].
Indeed two extension studies have been performed to clarify the optimal duration of therapy. The Fracture Intervention Trial Long term Extension (FLEX) trial was an extension study of FIT in which a large number of postmenopausal women who had already received alendronate during 5 years were randomly assigned to receive either alendronate or placebo [14]. Patients with femoral t score<-3.5 or those with t score value below the FIT baseline were excluded. Patients who received an additional five years of alendronate have lost less BMD and the incidence of clinical vertebral fracture was lower.
On the other hand the rate of morph metric vertebral, non- vertebral and hip fracture was similar between the two groups. A gradual decline of BMD was seen in patients randomized to placebo. This decline was then stabilized and BMD remained above the baseline. Another extension trial was Horizon extension trial which showed a greater loss in femoral BMD and an increase in morph metric vertebral fracture rate in patients randomized to placebo after receiving three consecutive yearly injections of zoledronic acid in comparison to those who received an additional three years of therapy [15]. Subgroup analyses showed that low femoral BMD (t score <-2.5) and incident vertebral fracture before or during study were the factors predicting future fracture risk.
In the light of these findings, the current recommendation is to stop bisphosphonate therapy in patients with low risk factors (i.e. t score <-2.5, without a history of fracture) after 5 years of therapy with alendronate or risedronate and 3 years of therapy with zoledronic acid. The need for restarting therapy should be reassessed and individual risk factors should be re evaluated every 2-3 years. For those who are in the high risk group treatment up to 10 years with alendronate, 7 years with risedronate and 6 years with zoledronic acid would prove to be beneficial without increasing side effects [1,7,12,14-16].