info@biomedres.us   +1 (720) 414-3554
  One Westbrook Corporate Center, Suite 300, Westchester, IL 60154, USA

Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research

May, 2021, Volume 36, 1, pp 28174-28176

Editorial

Editorial

Microfluidic Paper-Based Analytical Devices (ΜPADS) in Modern Analysis

Hobbs Bower Reang, Gagandeep and Rohit Bhatia*

Author Affiliations

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry & Analysis, ISF College of Pharmacy, India

Received: May 10, 2021 | Published: May 25, 2021

Corresponding author: Rohit Bhatia, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry & Analysis, ISF College of Pharmacy, India

DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2021.36.005794

Letter

Most of the analytical tools of the present world are sensitive, effective and efficient in almost all types of analytical studies. But they all generally have one major common disadvantage that most of these techniques require sophisticated equipment that are bulky in size and require qualified personnel for their operation. ‘Labon- a-chip’ [1] includes small yet efficient and reliable tools that can perform required analytical works on a comparatively smaller scale in a time much less than others. μPADs are one such tool that incorporates paper as the analytical medium for separation and analysis (Figure 1). Paper is the most abundant and inexpensive polymeric structure of cellulose available. Paper has micro-porous capillary like networks which are responsible for flow of solvents instead of pumps or electronic power, making paper an ideally usable tool [2]. Also, light-weight and portable paper devices are thus suitable to carry to on-field working and detection. μPADs use fabricated paper devices on which hydrophilic zones are formed within hydrophobic barriers. Hydrophilic zones act as regions for actual analytical purposes whereas hydrophobic zones act to demarcate separate zones from one another.

Figure 1: Schematic diagram of paper based analytical device.

Fabrication of μPADs can be done by various methods such as Wax Printing, Wax Dipping, Drawing, Photolithography, Polydimethylsiloxane plotting, Inkjet Printing, Cutting and Plasma Etching [3-6]. Detection methods involve Colorimetric [7,8], Electrochemical [9] as well as fluorimetric [10] approaches. In Colorimetric approaches, color is produced either due to reaction of reagents on the paper with sample in the solvent. Intensity of color is noted which is indicative of concentration of desired analyte under study. Intensity can be noted using Scanners, Digital Cameras or simply Smartphone Cameras and processed using Adobe Photoshop.

Pena-Pereira, et al. in 2016 [11] devised a method for thiocyanate detection in human saliva to be used as a biomarker for expecting tobacco smoke exposure using μPADs. The assay incorporated use of formation of an iron(III)-thiocyanate colored complex with colorimetric determination using a scanner. The detection limit was concluded to be 0.06mM of thiocyanate and Relative Standard Deviation was 3% for the method. Ortiz-Gomez, et al. in 2016 [12] developed a method for nitrite determination in samples chemically using paper-based devices and colorimetric sensing techniques.

Cellulosic paper was used as medium for detection where nitrite in sample was converted in nitrous acid which as a result converted s-dihydrotetrazine by oxidation to 1,2-dihydro-3,6- bis(3,5-dimethyl-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)-1,2,4,5-tetrazine (DHBPTz). This changes detection zone int pink which is analyzed for intensity using a smartphone camera for quantitative purposes. The group applied this method for determination of nitrites in water and limit of detection was found to be 1.30 μM for nitrites. They concluded that μPADs were stable for 21 days when stored away from heat and light. Later in 2018, Sununta, et al. [13] developed a similar simple, low cost yet effective method for detection of creatinine in urine. The group used principles of Jaffe reaction which involves reaction between creatinine and picric acid which forms colored complex under alkaline conditions. These colored complexes are easily detectable using colorimetry. Under optimized conditions linearity range of 0.2 to 1mM was achieved with LOD and LOQ of 0.08 and 0.26mM respectively. The accuracy of results was in compliance with Jaffe’s method and thus this method was used for determination effectively. Liu, et al. in 2018 [14] developed a colorimetric assaying method for dopamine in a wide range of samples such as cow serum, human serum and human plasma.

The methodology for detection involved redox reaction between dopamine and ferric chloride reducing Fe3+ to Fe2+ which as a result converts phenanthroline into red colored tris(1,10- phenanthroline) iron(II) complex. The method used simple, low cost wax printing fabricated paper devices and detection carried out using a phone camera and Photoshop software. This method showed linearity range between 0.527 to 4.75μmol/L concentration with detection limit of 0.37μmol/L. Relative Standard Deviation was found to be 0.11% and 0.15% for inter-day and intra-day studies respectively. Another group reported a method for colorimetric detection of hydrogen peroxide and glucose in samples using starch-iodide-gelatin system as color producing system [15]. Linear results were obtained between 0.5 to 5mM of glucose and 0.5 to 6mM of hydrogen peroxide with LOD of 0.05mM and 0.1mM respectively. Recovery values of glucose in real human serum samples were found between 95.7% to 97% using this method. The method was found to be quick, sensitive, accurate and reproducible and can be easily carried in resource limiting areas. In a nut shell, it can be concluded that paper based analytical devices may serve as an excellent tool in variety of analytical works. These techniques are simple, rapid, economic and require less human power or trainings. Continuous exploration of these techniques is in progress in various fields of science.

References

Editorial

Microfluidic Paper-Based Analytical Devices (ΜPADS) in Modern Analysis

Hobbs Bower Reang, Gagandeep and Rohit Bhatia*

Author Affiliations

Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry & Analysis, ISF College of Pharmacy, India

Received: May 10, 2021 | Published: May 25, 2021

Corresponding author: Rohit Bhatia, Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry & Analysis, ISF College of Pharmacy, India

DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2021.36.005794

Abstract

Most of the analytical tools of the present world are sensitive, effective and efficient in almost all types of analytical studies. But they all generally have one major common disadvantage that most of these techniques require sophisticated equipment that are bulky in size and require qualified personnel for their operation. ‘Labon- a-chip’ [1] includes small yet efficient and reliable tools that can perform required analytical works on a comparatively smaller scale in a time much less than others. μPADs are one such tool that incorporates paper as the analytical medium for separation and analysis (Figure 1).