info@biomedres.us   +1 (720) 414-3554
  One Westbrook Corporate Center, Suite 300, Westchester, IL 60154, USA

Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research

October, 2020, Volume 31, 1, pp 23899-23904

Review Article

Review Article

Palliative Oral Healthcare for Patients with Terminal Stages of Malignancy

Sheikh Abrar and Pavan Manohar Patil*

Author Affiliations

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dental Sciences, Uttar Pradesh, India

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Professor and Head of Department, School of Dental Sciences, Uttar Pradesh, India

Received: September 29, 2020 | Published: October 09, 2020

Corresponding author: Pavan Manohar Patil, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Professor and Head of Department, School of Dental Sciences, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2020.31.005046

Introduction

Oral symptoms typically increase as end of life approaches in patients on palliative care for terminal stages of malignancy. Hence, the focus of oral healthcare providers is to manage symptoms and maximize quality of life during the end-of-life transition. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), in a recently updated clinical practice guideline, strongly recommends that palliative care be provided to all patients with advanced cancer early in the disease course, at the same time as active treatment [1]. Wiseman [2] advocated that symptom relief was the primary principle of palliative care dentistry, which focused on treatment of terminally ill patients in whom the oral cavity was affected directly or indirectly by the illness. Care for the oral cavity problems assumes great importance since it provides an important route for nutrition, medications, speech and affection by kissing. Medical management of palliative care patients with chemotherapy/radiotherapy or both, often lead to development of oral complications among these patients. A sneak preview into the oral cavity problems in palliative care patients can be gauged by the report of National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health, United States of America, which indicated that 80% of patients receiving myeloablative chemotherapy will develop oral complications, and oral mucositis or taste disturbances were associated with the use of palliative drugs such as bisphosphonates and analgesics [3].

The pain and suffering of palliative patients with oral conditions may be minimized by early diagnosis and treatment of oral conditions [4]. However, there is widespread under reporting and underestimation of oral health care problems in palliative care patients. 40% of palliative patients are unable to communicate their oral health needs or may not complain of discomfort in their oral cavity, erroneously believing that such conditions are an inevitable effect of their palliative medical therapy [5].

Oral Effects of Palliative Cancer Care

The oral problems faced by palliative cancer care patients are listed in Table 1. These problems will be discussed in terms of their management strategies in the following sections.

Table 1: Oral Problems Faced by Palliative Care Patients.

Oral Mucositis / Stomatitis

The oral cavity is affected by chemotherapy and radiotherapy which are used in the treatment of cancer patients and sometimes extended into the palliative period to reduce pain and improve function [6]. Tissues of the oral cavity that exhibit high mitotic turnover are affected by chemotherapy, leading to atrophy of the tissues. Radiotherapy brings about sclerosis of the small vessels which vascularise the oral tissues [7]. Indexes used to grade the severity of oral mucositis (OM) are outlined in Table 2 [6]. Pathophysiology involved in the development of OM was classically proposed in a five phase model by [8] in 2008. The initiation phase involves direct DNA damage from radio or chemotherapy to basal epithelial, submucosal, and endothelial cells. These damaged cells in turn release mediators that bind to specific receptors and lead to inflammation and toxicity [9]. As a result of this damage, oxidative stress forms reactive oxygen species that damage cell membranes, stimulate macrophages, and trigger molecules that activate transcription factors, including nuclear factor (NF)-κ B which is considered to be the gatekeeper for inflammatory pathways involved in mucositis [7]. Its activation is associated with increased amounts of proinflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-6, and IL-1β. It also uppregulates the enzyme cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) in submucosal fibroblasts and endothelial cells [7]. This is followed by the ulcerative phase which is characterized by loss of mucosal integrity and microbiological colonization by oral bacteria. The final phase is that of ulcer healing, characterized by epithelial proliferation (usually coexistent with hematopoietic recovery), local microbial reestablishment and absence of wound healing inhibiting factors such as infection and mechanical irritation [7].

Table 2: Grading Indices for Oral Mucositis/Stomatitis.

Oral mucositis management is aimed at symptom management and prevention of complications, which may encompass strategies such as pain control, nutritional support and prophylaxis/treatment of secondary infections. Preventive measures could be started if the OM is undeveloped but patient is undergoing treatment which has a high propensity to cause OM. However, once OM develops, therapy must be instituted. WHO grade 1 and 2 mucositis must be treated with maintenance of oral hygiene, saline rinses, removal of dentures if they are irritating, closely monitoring nutritional status, reference to dietician if eating and drinking are affected, simple analgesia in the form of soluble paracetamol 1g four times daily as mouthwash [10]. Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are contraindicated due to the risk of bleeding and renal impairment10. Benzydamine hydrochloride 0.15% oral solution may be rinsed every 1.5 to 3 hours, as required. Increasing folinic acid rescue for methotrexate induced mucositis may be considered. Antibiotics are prescribed when there is evidence of oral infection. Consider use of Caphosol® (EUSA Pharma,4–10 times a day) to prevent grade 1 and 2 OM becoming more severe. WHO grade 3 and 4 OM is treated with the use of stronger analgesia, including oxycodone hydrochloride 5% oral solution, morphine sulfa pentahydrate 10mg or morphine oral solution 10mg/5 ml to alleviate pain. If the pain continues, consider using further opioid analgesia, such as fentanyl patches, patient-controlled analgesia or a syringe driver [10].

Laxatives are prescribed to prevent constipation and associated nausea. Consideration must be given to applying a coating protectant such as Gelclair®, Mugard®, Episil® which is rinsed around the mouth to form a protective layer over the sore areas, applied d 1 hour before eating [10]. Chlorhexidine mouthwashes are contraindicated in any patient who has or is recovering from cytotoxic induced mucositis, as they tend to inhibit mucosal regrowth [10]. Recently, cryotherapy has been establisged as an effective treatment modality which is easy to use, cost effective and efficient [11]. Intraoral photobiomodulation using low level laser light is also producing promising results [12].

Dysphagia

Dysphagia may occur in either of its two phases; the oropharyngeal phase or the esophageal phase. The oropharyngeal phase may be affected by poor dentition, inadequate saliva production, sufficient muscular function, obstructed oral pathway, or pain from ulcers, herpes, or fungi [13]. Inability to masticate foods may result from tooth loss, ill-fitting dentures, dental caries, or advanced periodontal disease. Pain and function must be evaluated by the palliative care dentist. Dental caries and periodontal disease must be treated and prosthetic replacement of teeth to restore oral function should be based on prognostic longevity of the patient. Most palliative care patients may not be a good candidates for crowns or implants but may benefit from removable partial dentures [13].

Nutritional Support

It is estimated that 70% of terminally ill patients suffer from anorexia (lack or loss of appetite for food) [14]. Reasons include interference in mastication, depression, pain, stomatitis, dysphagia, nausea, depression and effect of medications used for palliative cancer therapy [15]. Nonpharmacologic methods to combat anorexia may include provision of more frequent, small highenergy meals, where the meal is made to look as appetizing as possible using colorful foods arranged in a visually pleasing way [15]. Preparing foods that the patient relishes is another way. Nutritional supplements and dietary counselling may assist in nutrition enhancement. Pharmacologic agents to stimulate the appetite include megestrol acetate, cannabinoids, progestins, anamorelin and corticosteroids [14]. These should be prescribed by the physician. Additionally, as the patient’s mouth may be dry, moist and soft meals are recommended so that the patient may swallow it easily. High calorie shakes promote nutrition, sooth the mucosa and can be appetizing for the patient [15]. Use of food seasonings however may irritate the mucosa and must be checked for individual patient tolerance. Enteral and parenteral nutrtion are the last resort in palliative care patients. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network issued guidelines for Palliative Care in 2017 wherein it recommended that enteral and parenteral feeding be considered only in patients who had a prognosis for life of longer than weeks rather than days [16].

Nausea and Vomiting

Chemotherapy commonly results in nausea and vomiting as a side effect of chemotherapeutic drugs. Additional causes may be peptic ulcer disease, malignancy associated gastroparesis, metabolic disturbances, and opiod use. Chronic vomiting is of importance to the oral healthcare provider as the acid content of vomit can erode tooth enamel, cause tooth sensitivity and increases the severity of mucositis and stomatitis [15]. The use of fluoride rinses and fluoride varnish applications can counteract the erosive effect of chronic vomiting. The Multinational Association for Supportive care in cancer/European society for medical oncology MASCC/ESMO consensus recommendations 2016 for management of nausea and vomiting in advanced cancer advise the use of metoclopramide (titrated to effect) as the first choice drug, with alternative options being haloperidol, levomepromazine, or olanzapine [17]. Octreotide is recommended in cases of bowel obstruction, given alongside an antiemetic (haloperidol) or when inappropriate, to use an anticholinergic antisecretory agent such as scopolamine butylbromide or glycopyrronium bromide [17]. For opioid-induced nausea and vomiting, no recommendation could be made. However, it was opined that opioid rotation and route switching may be effective approaches [17]. Fluid replacement is advisable through parenteral routes such as intravenous or subcutaneous routes. Oral fluids must be started as soon as the patient is able to tolerate.

Nausea can make denture wearing difficult, which hinders mastication and more importantly, compromise their quality of life by affecting their social interactions [15]. Oral hygiene must be instituted as a strict regimen, taking care to prevent triggering a gagging reflex with the use of a smaller toothbrush (child size) if necessary.

Xerostomia/Dry Mouth

Xerostomia or dry mouth is believed to be present if the patient states that his/her mouth is dry, although, the oral mucosa may appear to be moist. Salivary gland hypofunction on the other hand is defined by a quantitative salivary flow rate of < 0.7 ml/min [18]. Xerostomia is commonly encountered in palliative care patients with medication use the most common cause, notably analgesics, antidepressants, diuretics and antiemetics. The use of alcohol mouthwashes, and caffeinated beverages may just aggravate the condition15. The effects of xerostomia are observed in the quality of life of the patient as it affects their ability to eat, communicate, and interact socially [19]. Dental caries is significantly higher in xerostomic patients [20]. Additionally xerostomic patients prefer to eat foods that are softer and cariogenic [21]. The palliative oral healthcare provider must strive keep the mouth moist. Measures to ensure a moist mucosa by salivation is hydration, humidifying the patient’s room and use of artificial saliva agents. Hydration of the oral mucosa can be achieved with the use of a water soluble lubricant such as ‘Oral Balance gel’ (lactoperoxidase, lysozyme, glucose oxidase, lactoferrin) or mucin-containing ‘AS Saliva Orthana’ [22]. Nursing assistants may apply the gel uniformly all around the oral cavity using a foam brush. Petroleum based products such as vaseline are not recommended as they are unpalatable, anhydrous and hydroscopic, thereby absorbing water from the tissues. Salivary elimination of bacteria from the oral cavity may also be impeded by their ability to occlude harmful bacteria [22]. There is a potential combustible threat from such products in patients on oxygen support.

Hydration may be achieved with simple measures such as frequent sips or sprays of cold water, sucking ice cubes or chewing sugar-free gum. Alchohol containing mouth rinses are not recommended as they tend to further desiccate the mouth [22]. Alcohol-free rinses should be used before meals to improve swallowing. Cholinergic-mimetic drugs such as pilocarpine (5mg thrice a day) or cevimeline in palliative care have been recommended as the first line therapy in head and neck cancer survivors with radiotherapy-induced xerostomia and hyposalivation [23]. However, in chemotherapy induced xerostomia, these drugs do not have the same level of evidence. Malic acid, vitamin C and citric acids used in topical application form can stimulate saliva. However, their low pH predisposes teeth to demineralization [22]. Newer methods to combat xerostomia, especially in the post radiotherapy palliative care patient include acupuncture-like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (ALTENS) [24] and acupuncture alone [25]. The advantage of both are that they can be provided to the patient at home and therefore no hospital visit is required.

Candidiasis

Also popularly known as oral thrush, it affects 70-85% of palliative care patients [22]. Factors that predispose patients include lack of oral hygiene, hyposalivation/xerostomia, anemia, immunosuppression, long term corticosteroid use, use of broad spectrum antibiotics, nutritional deficiencies, diabetes mellitus and denture wearing. Clinically, candidiasis may be of pseudomembranous, atrophic or hyperplastic type. Candidiasis may be treated by a combination of topical and systemic medications. Topical medications include Nystatin suspension (swish 3-5 times daily), sugarless fruit juice containing frozen nystatin suspension, nystatin vaginal suppository, clotrimazole vaginal suppository, clotrimazole troche, clotrimazole vaginal cream 1% (denture application for a week) [22]. Systemic medications include options such as Ketoconazole (200–400 mg orally for 1-2 weeks), Fluconazole (100–200 mg on day 1, then 50–100 mg/day orally for 1-2 weeks), Itraconazole (100–200 mg/day orally for 1-2 weeks) and Amphotericin B (0.25–1.5 mg/kg a day intravenously) in resistant cases [22]. Recently, a single dose regimen of Fluconazole 150 mg has been reported to be effective in treatment of oral thrush [26].

Denture care is vital in preventing denture-related candidiasis. Dentures should be stored overnight in a dedicated vessel in solutions of water, 0.12% chlorhexidine solution, Listerine solution or 100 000 IU of nystatin suspension [22]. Soaking the denture in bleach (15 mL) and water (250 mL) for 30 minutes can assist in getting rid of unpleasant odour from the denture. However. the metal part of partial dentures may fatigue on immersion in bleach solution [22]. Benzalkonium chloride (1:750) can also be used for denture immersion for 30 minutes. Boiling the denture may distort the denture base, however, disinfection may be achieved by microwaving it in water at high power for 5 minutes. Repeated microwaving, however, is to be cautioned against as this can result in hardening of soft denture linings [22].

Orofacial Pain

The Indian society for study of pain (ISSP) Cancer Pain Special Interest Group guidelines (2019) [27] have provided clinical answers for palliative care pain management. ISSP recommends that in ambulatory palliative care patients, the stepladder analgesic model be used for cancer pain management. Patients’ “level” of pain (mild, moderate, or severe) is determined through numerical rating scale for pain. Mild pain step 1: is treated using nonopioid analgesics (NSAIDs or acetaminophen), moderate pain step 2: is managed with a weak opioid analgesic, alone or in combination with a nonopioid or adjuvant analgesic) and severe pain step 3: is managed with a strong opioid analgesic, alone or in combination with a nonopioid or adjuvant analgesic) [27].

Some patients with poorly controlled cancer pain in ambulatory and home care require admission for acute inpatient pain management. Methods used to treat such individuals include rapid oral opioid titration along with adjuvants, correcting the treatable cause of pain using palliative radiotherapy, physiotherapy, or by correcting hypercalcemia, etc. [27]. Acute pain crisis is treated with admistration of intravenous opioid, followed by opioid infusion for maintenance therapy. Oral and transdermal preparations are substituted once stable pain relief is achieved. Neuromodulation is attempted using intravenous lignocaine or ketamine boluses, followed by maintenance dose with these drugs in cases with neuropathic pain crisis [27]. A consensus was published regarded use of methadone (opiod) in end-of-life cancer patients by the Hospice and Palliative Care experts group in 2019 [28]. Methadone therapy is indicated in cases of moderate to severe pain (especially as a second line opioid choice), pain not controlled by other opioids, allergy to morphine, significantly impaired renal function, when a long-acting opioid in oral solution form is needed, high opioid tolerance, opioid adverse effects from other opioids, patients with dysphagia/ inability to swallow, or feeding tube placement [28].

Home Oral Care

The importance of oral hygiene maintenance and care is frequently overlooked in terminally ill patients, especially if it is being carried out by a caregiver, until the person’s quality of life is compromised by their oral symptoms [29]. Therefore, oral health maintenance through oral hygiene measures are vital in palliative oral care. Measures to be taken are enlisted in Table 3 [30-32].

Table 3: Oral Hygiene Maintenance Strategies in Palliative Care.

Adjunctive Therapies

Dignity therapy is an individualized, brief intervention to facilitate the expression of thoughts, feelings, and memories in terminally ill patients that assists in boosting their dignity, reduces psychological distress, and improves quality of life [33]. Training the caregivers in basic skills including oral hygiene measures will improve the quality of oral health and general quality of life in patients on palliative care [34].

Conclusion

End of life oral health care presents a significant challenge to the oral healthcare provider. Nutrition plays a vital role in the overall well being of a patient and good oral health compliments nutritional enrichment of the entire body. Caregivers need to be educated along with patients about the importance of maintaining a good oral hygiene and reporting any untoward oral symptoms for immediate care and treatment, so as to prevent complications that may be a long drawn battle in the palliative care patient. Good oral health goes a long way in improving the quality of life in palliatve cancer care.

References

Review Article

Palliative Oral Healthcare for Patients with Terminal Stages of Malignancy

Sheikh Abrar and Pavan Manohar Patil*

Author Affiliations

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dental Sciences, Uttar Pradesh, India

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Professor and Head of Department, School of Dental Sciences, Uttar Pradesh, India

Received: September 29, 2020 | Published: October 09, 2020

Corresponding author: Pavan Manohar Patil, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Professor and Head of Department, School of Dental Sciences, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2020.31.005046

Abstract

Oral symptoms typically increase as end of life approaches in patients on palliative care for terminal stages of malignancy. Hence, the focus of oral healthcare providers is to manage symptoms and maximize quality of life during the end-of-life transition. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), in a recently updated clinical practice guideline, strongly recommends that palliative care be provided to all patients with advanced cancer early in the disease course, at the same time as active treatment [1]. Wiseman [2] advocated that symptom relief was the primary principle of palliative care dentistry, which focused on treatment of terminally ill patients in whom the oral cavity was affected directly or indirectly by the illness. Care for the oral cavity problems assumes great importance since it provides an important route for nutrition, medications, speech and affection by kissing.