info@biomedres.us   +1 (720) 414-3554
  One Westbrook Corporate Center, Suite 300, Westchester, IL 60154, USA

Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research

July, 2019, Volume 20, 3, pp 15095-15099

Research Article

Research Article

Prognostic Significance of Biomarkers in Predicting in-Hospital All-Cause Mortality in Elderly Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction

M Broslavskyte1, R Serpytis2, G Navickas2, S Glaveckaite2, R Samalavicius3 and P Serpytis1

Author Affiliations

1Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania

2Clinic of Cardiovascular diseases, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania

3Clinic of Emergency Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania

Received: July 31, 2019 | Published: August 13, 2019

Corresponding author: Margarita Broslavskytė, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Universiteto St, LT 01513 Vilnius, Lithuania

DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2019.20.003462

Abstract

Background: AMI is a common cause of death in elderly patients. Therefore, prognostic prediction has become crucially important part of the treatment process.

Aim: We aimed to investigate prognostic significance of biomarkers and other clinical factors in predicting all-cause in-hospital mortality in patients older than 75 years with AMI.

Materials and Methods: 2059 consecutive patients were retrospectively included in single center study. Participants were divided into groups based on their in-hospital mortality. The prognostic ability of biomarkers peak values was evaluated by using ROC curve and binary logistic regression analysis.

Results: Among 2059 patients enrolled in this study, 1141 (55.4%) were woman, and 1060 (51.5%) were with a diagnosis of non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. The mean age (SD) of the study population was 81.97 (4.33) years. In-hospital mortality rate in our study was 13.3%. Peak Troponin I, BNP and hs-CRP concentrations were significantly higher in deceased patients (all p<0.01). The area under the ROC curve for Troponin I was 0.595, 0.653 for BNP and 0.664 for hs-CRP. BNP level >824.3 ng/l and hs-CRP level >78.7 g/l were disclosed as the best thresholds for mortality prediction in this age group. Using binary logistic regression, hs-CRP level >78.7 g/l (OR (95% CI), 2.68 (1.89-3.81)), stroke history (OR (95%CI), 2.3 (1.53-3.47)), BNP level >824.3 ng/l (OR (95% CI), 2.04 (1.43- 2.91)), in-hospital bleeding complications (OR (95% CI), 2.04 (1.27-3.28)) were identified as strongest independent predictors of in-hospital all-cause mortality.

Conclusion: In-hospital mortality in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction is 13.3%. Troponin I is the least useful biomarker in predicting mortality. Increased levels of hs-CRP, BNP, stroke history and the presence of any in-hospital bleeding complications were identified as reliable predictors of in-hospital mortality in the elderly population with acute myocardial infarction.

Keywords: Acute Myocardial Infarction; All-Cause Hospital Mortality; Biomarkers; Prognosis

Abbreviations: BNP: B-Type Natriuretic Peptide; HS-CRP: High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein; OR: Odds Ratio; STEMI: ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Introduction

Due to the fast growth of aged population, acute coronary syndrome is a major health problem worldwide. Elderly patients represent a large group of patients admitted to hospital with a diagnosis of AMI. Advanced age is an important risk factor of adverse outcomes of both invasive and conservative treatment methods [1,2]. Many elderly patients also suffer from other diseases that have short-term and long-term impact on their health. The most common comorbidities are diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease [3,4]. While making decisions on the best treatment options, it is very important to evaluate each patient’s prognosis and risk of complications or death. Although it is important to have a risk stratification tool suitable for this age group, elder population is often underrepresented in many clinical trials [5].Biomarkers used in myocardial infarction and heart failure diagnosis such as B-type natriuretic peptide, cardiac Troponin I and high-sensitivity C reactive protein can add a prognostic value while making a clinical evaluation [6-8]. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between different diagnostic biomarkers and inhospital mortality in elderly patients with AMI.

Material and Methods

A retrospective single-center study of 2059 consecutively collected patients older than 75 years admitted with acute STsegment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) or non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) was conducted. Patients were hospitalized in Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics in Vilnius, Lithuania, between 1st January 2012 and December 31st, 2016. AMI was diagnosed according to the 3rd Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction [9]. We collected the following data: sex, age, comorbidities such as atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, history of previous myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke, Killip class on admission, highest Troponin I, BNP, hsCRP values, coronary angiography findings, treatment choices and all-cause mortality rate. In hospital bleeding complications were categorized into major and minor. Major bleeding was defined as bleeding associated with death, transfusion of more than 2 units of packed RBCs or whole blood, a reduction in the level of Hb >2g/dL or a serious lifethreatening clinical event requiring medical intervention. Minor bleeding event was considered as every bleeding event that does not fulfill the criteria of major bleeding. Clinical and demographic data were retrospectively evaluated from patients’ medical data. All participants were categorized according to their treatment outcomes into deceased and alive patients’ groups. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from local bioethical committee (Nr.158200-18/4-1015-522).

Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was performed using IBM SPSS 22 and MedCalc (version 18.11.3) statistical software. The normality of the data was checked by using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Continuous variables were expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD) or medians and interquartile range (IQR, Q1-Q3). Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. Continuous variables were analyzed by using Mann-Whitney U test and categorical variables were analyzed by using Chi-square test. Binary logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of all-cause mortality of study population. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence index (CI) were calculated for Troponin I, BNP and hs-CRP. Cut off values, sensitivity and specificity for biomarkers to predict in-hospital mortality were calculated. All p values <0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

Results

Out of 2059 patients, 1060 (51.5%) had a final diagnosis of NSTEMI and 999 (48.5%) had a STEMI. 1141 (55.4%) participants were women and 918 (44.6%) were men. The mean (SD) age of the study population was 81.97 (4.33) years. 274 (13.3%) patients have died during the hospital stay. The clinical characteristics of study patients in respect of in-hospital death are shown in Table 1. Some statistically significant differences were found between groups: older age, STEMI diagnosis, Killip class 4 and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on admission, presence of atrial fibrillation during the hospital stay, previous stroke history, conservative treatment approach, minor or major bleeding complications during in-hospital course were more common among patients that deceased. We found out that patients, that died, had significantly higher peak values of Troponin I (24415.97 vs. 11404.52 ng/l, p<0.01), BNP (1823.57 vs. 945.79 ng/l, p<0.01), CRP (107.95 vs. 51.54 g/l, p<0.01) (Figure 1). ROC analysis was performed to determine the accuracy of these biomarkers and in order to find the best value that can predict patient’s death. The AUC for Troponin I was 0.595 (Standard error (SE), 0.02; 95% Confidence interval (CI), 0.57 to 0.62, p<0.01), 0.65 (SE, 0.02; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.68, p<0.01) for BNP and 0.664 (SE, 0.02; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.69, p<0.01) for hs-CRP. A cut-off value of BNP was 824.3 ng/l (sensitivity, 64.2%; specificity, 62%) and 78.7 g/l (sensitivity, 50.64%; specificity, 76.7%) for hs-CRP. ROC comparison revealed no significant difference between BNP and hs-CRP (p=0.41) or Troponin I (p=0.07) AUCs. A weak significant (p=0.01) difference was between Troponin I and hs-CRP AUCs. The mortality rate was higher among patients with BNP level >824.3 ng/l (19% vs. 7.5%, p<0.01), hs-CRP level >78.7 g/l (19.4% vs. 8%, p<0.01). Using binary logistic regression, we estimated that patients with hs-CRP levels >78.7 g/l were almost 3 times more likely to die during the hospital stay after AMI (OR (95% CI), 2.68 (1.89-3.81), p<0.01) and more than 2 times with BNP levels >824.3 ng/l (OR (95% CI), 2.04 (1.43-2.91), p<0.01). Patients, that had stroke history or that had a by bleeding complications during the stay in the hospital, were also more than 2 times likely to not survive (Table 2).

Figure 1: Troponin I, BNP and hs-CRP ROC curves for inhospital mortality prediction.

Abbreviations: AUC: Area Under the Curve; BNP: B-Type Natriuretic Peptide; HS-CRP: High sensitivity C Reactive Protein; ROC: Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve.

Table 1: Characteristics of study population based on their survival.

Myocardial Infarction; NSTEMI: Non-ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction; PCI: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; SD: Standard Deviation; STEMI: ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Table 2: Binary logistic regression for predicting all-cause in-hospital mortality in elderly Patients.

Abbreviations: BNP: B-Type Natriuretic Peptide; HS-CRP: High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein; OR: Odds Ratio; STEMI: ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Discussion

According to ICD-11 [1], complex PTSD is a disorder that may develop following exposure to an event of an extremely threatening, most commonly prolonged or repetitive events from which escape is difficult, including repeated childhood sexual abuse, as in the case presented here. It is considered a broader diagnosis that includes PTSD core symptoms plus an additional set of “disturbances in selforganization” symptoms, which are distributed in three clusters: affective dysregulation, negative self-concept, and disturbances in relationships [2,3]. There is extensive discussion in the literature regarding clinical aspects of C-PTSD and its common features with other diagnostic categories related to interpersonal trauma such as borderline personality disorder [3,4]. In addition, the high prevalence of comorbidity with other mental disorders imposes a challenge in the differential diagnosis [5]. In this case, the patient’s symptoms of negative self-concept, emotional dysregulation and conflicting interpersonal relationships were more evident after longitudinal evaluation and observation of aspects of the clinical history that had not been reported initially and raised a review on the patient’s diagnosis and therapeutic strategies.

Sensitivity and specificity of biomarkers were also high in accessing the risk of death in common comorbidities or complications in elderly patients. These markers are valuable in predicting cardiovascular death in acute heart failure and might be useful in common comorbidities in elderly patients such as community-acquired pneumonia, severe sepsis or septic shock [16-18]. This work is one in a few studies focusing on risk assessing only in elderly and very elderly patients during AMI. Our study showed a significant association between selected biomarkers and cardiac mortality during the hospital stay, which was similar to other authors’ results [19- 21]. Levels of all biomarkers were higher in non-surviving patients after AMI. Although, in our results specificity and sensitivity were lower than in earlier mentioned studies, it is important to note that our study consists only of elderly patients with many comorbidities and history of cardiovascular disease (CVD). In our study high-sensitivity Troponin I had a weakest predictive value in comparison to BNP or hs-CRP.

A prospective multicenter study by Gimenez et al. concluded that Troponin I show a high accuracy in early diagnosing myocardial infarction, but it does not have a good prognostic value as in our findings [22]. It is important to highlight that BNP level >824.3 ng/l was found as a cut-off value to predict mortality in this age group. In similar studies lower BNP cut-off values were identified as a significant predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including death. However, patients in these studies had lower mean or patients aged more than 80 years old were as exclusion criteria and that might contribute to such results [23,24]. In contrast, studies with only older patients as participants showed much higher cut-off values as a mortality indicator [25, 26]. These findings are important as some studies note that BNP loses its diagnostic power in elderly patients, but our results show that it can be a valuable biomarker for risk stratification [27,28]. Our analysis revealed that hs-CRP has the highest AUC with a specificity of 76.7% in predicting adverse outcomes. This biomarker plays a significant role in cardiovascular disease pathogenesis and in other conditions that contribute to all-cause mortality [29].

A recent study by Mani et al. revealed that initial and subsequent hs-CRP increase after 16 days was a good prognostic tool in predicting MACE, cardiovascular death and all-cause death. Patients with AMI and elevated hs-CRP concentration are at greater risk of inhospital death and are in need of close monitoring in order to avoid death or complications [8,30]. Furthermore, our research indicates that patients with elevated BNP and hs-CRP levels were three times more likely to die after AMI. These findings could be beneficial in better understanding of the elevated biomarkers impact during AMI within the elderly population. Knowing that greater BNP and hs-CRP levels lead to poor outcomes in this age group could increase our attention towards more effective management of these patients and treatment strategy decision. There are possible limitations of our research. One of them is retrospective nature of our study. Secondly, we did not evaluate long-term outcomes of study patients and prognostic abilities of biomarkers in follow-up. In addition, quality of life was not measured following myocardial infarction due to no data available on this topic.

Conclusion

In our study in-hospital mortality in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction was 13.3%. Hs-CRP and BNP elevation are important predictors of in-hospital mortality and should be evaluated in elderly patients during AMI. In contrast, Troponin I elevation is less accurate biomarker in risk stratification of inhospital all-cause mortality. Stroke in patients’ history and inhospital bleeding complications are also relevant factors that have a prognostic value.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

References

Research Article

Prognostic Significance of Biomarkers in Predicting in-Hospital All-Cause Mortality in Elderly Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction

M Broslavskyte1, R Serpytis2, G Navickas2, S Glaveckaite2, R Samalavicius3 and P Serpytis2

Author Affiliations

1Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania

2Clinic of Cardiovascular diseases, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania

3Clinic of Emergency Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius, Lithuania

Received: July 31, 2019 | Published: August 13, 2019

Corresponding author: Margarita Broslavskytė, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Universiteto St, LT 01513 Vilnius, Lithuania

DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2019.20.003462

Abstract

Background: AMI is a common cause of death in elderly patients. Therefore, prognostic prediction has become crucially important part of the treatment process.

Aim: We aimed to investigate prognostic significance of biomarkers and other clinical factors in predicting all-cause in-hospital mortality in patients older than 75 years with AMI.

Materials and Methods: 2059 consecutive patients were retrospectively included in single center study. Participants were divided into groups based on their in-hospital mortality. The prognostic ability of biomarkers peak values was evaluated by using ROC curve and binary logistic regression analysis.

Results: Among 2059 patients enrolled in this study, 1141 (55.4%) were woman, and 1060 (51.5%) were with a diagnosis of non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction. The mean age (SD) of the study population was 81.97 (4.33) years. In-hospital mortality rate in our study was 13.3%. Peak Troponin I, BNP and hs-CRP concentrations were significantly higher in deceased patients (all p<0.01). The area under the ROC curve for Troponin I was 0.595, 0.653 for BNP and 0.664 for hs-CRP. BNP level >824.3 ng/l and hs-CRP level >78.7 g/l were disclosed as the best thresholds for mortality prediction in this age group. Using binary logistic regression, hs-CRP level >78.7 g/l (OR (95% CI), 2.68 (1.89-3.81)), stroke history (OR (95%CI), 2.3 (1.53-3.47)), BNP level >824.3 ng/l (OR (95% CI), 2.04 (1.43- 2.91)), in-hospital bleeding complications (OR (95% CI), 2.04 (1.27-3.28)) were identified as strongest independent predictors of in-hospital all-cause mortality.

Conclusion: In-hospital mortality in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction is 13.3%. Troponin I is the least useful biomarker in predicting mortality. Increased levels of hs-CRP, BNP, stroke history and the presence of any in-hospital bleeding complications were identified as reliable predictors of in-hospital mortality in the elderly population with acute myocardial infarction.

Keywords: Acute Myocardial Infarction; All-Cause Hospital Mortality; Biomarkers; Prognosis

Abbreviations: BNP: B-Type Natriuretic Peptide; HS-CRP: High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein; OR: Odds Ratio; STEMI: ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction