info@biomedres.us   +1 (720) 414-3554
  One Westbrook Corporate Center, Suite 300, Westchester, IL 60154, USA

Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research

February, 2019, Volume 15, 2, pp 1-3

Mini Review

Mini Review

In Vitro Chemosensitivity Assessed with MTT Assay in 100 Leukemic Patients

Zhi guo Zhang1, Jie Song1, Shuai Bai1 and Hua Yang*2

Author Affiliations

1Department of Pharmacy, the 960th Hospital of PLA, China

2Department of Immunology, Taishan Medical College, China

Received: February 19, 2019 | Published: February 26, 2019

Corresponding author: Hua Yang, Department of Immunology, Taishan Medical College, China

DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2019.15.002665

Also View In:

Abstract

Chemotherapy possesses an important position in the treatment course of cancer. Cellular drug resistance is supposed to play a major role in chemotherapy failure. The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility of the application of MTT assay in the in vitro chemosensitivity test, in attempt to supply theory reference for clinical therapy of leukemia. We obtained peripheral blood from 100 patients with leukemia at the time of initial diagnosis or relapse. Leukemic cells were separated and the chemosensitivity testing was performed by MTT colorimetric assay. The following drugs were tested: cytarabine, vincristine, methotrexate, daunorubicin, etoposide, teniposide, homoharringtonine, doxorubicin, and mitoxantrone. The Inhibition rates of each drug for four kinds of leukemia were analyzed.

Keywords: Chemosensitivity; Leukemia; Drug Resistance

Abbreviations: DNR: Daunorubicin; VP-16: Etoposide; Ara-C: Cytosine Arabinoside; VCR: Vincristine; HHT: Homoharringtonine; MIT: Mitoxantrone; DOX: Daunomycin; VM-26: Teniposide; MTX: Methotrexate. ALL: Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia; ANLL: Acute Non Lymphocytic Leukemia; CLL: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia; CML: Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia

Introduction

As we all know the reason of a failure and relapse of leukemia is due to multidrug resistance. As the whole body treatment, chemotherapy possesses an important position in the treatment course of cancer. The different response is found among the individuals during the chemotherapy course, although the same tumor tissue type present. The chemotherapy for individuals has become a highlight in the research of tumor treatment and the experiment of anticancer drug sensitivity in vitro is the base and evidence for the realization of individual chemotherapy. A good way of detecting drug resistance, not taking into account the specific mechanisms of resistance, is the use of different chemosensitivity testing assays. There are many experiments for anticancer drug sensitivity at present. Among them, MTT method presents the features of simple, economic as well as accurate and is carried out by the most researchers. So we used MTT assay in the in vitro chemosensitivity test, in attempt to supply theory reference for clinical therapy of leukemia.

For the in vitro chemosensitivity testing, 100 samples with leukemic cells were separated from peripheral blood. All of these samples were technically successful and diagnosis at inclusion. Freshly obtained peripheral blood were diluted 1:1 with Hank’s. Mononuclear cells were separated on Ficoll-Hypaque gradient (density: 1.077g/mL; Solarbio, beijing, China) at 2000rpm for 20min. After washing with Hank’s, the cells were resuspended in culture medium containing RPMI-1640, 10% fetal calf serum, 100 IU/mL penicillin, and 100 g/mL streptomycin. 9 drugs which are usually prescribed to patients were dissolved in culture medium at drug concentrations as follows: daunorubicin (DNR) 200μg/mL, cytosine arabinoside (Ara-C) 3000μg/mL, mitoxantron (MIT) 25μg/ mL, doxorubicin (DOX) 100 μg/mL, etoposide (VP-16) 600 μg/mL, vincristine (VCR) 10μg/mL, methotrexate (MTX) 100μg/mL, homoharringtonine (HHT) 10μg/mL and teniposide (VP-26) 500 μg/mL. In this study, the concentrations of drugs in vitro were designed to mimic those in vivo situation [1].

180 μL cell suspension at 1×106cells/mL was incubated with 20μL each drug solution in duplicate wells of a 96-well culture plate. Control cells were cultured in the absence of test drugs. Cells were incubated at 37℃ in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. After 2 days, 20μL of MTT (Sigma Co, St. Louis, MO, USA) in phosphate buffered salt solution (5mg/mL) was added to each well. After 4 h incubation, the medium was discarded, and the formazan crystals were dissolved with 100μL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Sigma Co, St. Louis, MO, USA). The absorbance was measured by an automatic plate reader with a 570 nm test wavelength. Viability of the leukemic cells was calculated using the following equation:

Inhibition rate=1-(OD observed/OD control) ×100%

The result of in vitro chemosensitivity was determined to be sensitive (>50% MTT dead cell) or resistant (<50% MTT dead cell) (Figure 1) Showed the inhibition rates of a patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) to the 9 drugs in vitro. The patient showed resistant to MTX, VRC and Ara-C, while sensitive to other 6 drugs of the 100 patients studied in the in vitro drug sensitivity test, patients with acute lymphocytic leukemia showed sensitive to teniposide and daunorubicin, patients with acute non-lymphocytic leukemia showed sensitive to teniposide, patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia showed sensitive to teniposide, daunorubicin, mitoxantrone, etoposide and homoharringtonine, patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia showed sensitive to teniposide and daunorubicin (Table 1). As we all known, drug resistance plays a major role in chemotherapy failures of leukemia [2,3]. MTT assay is feasible and makes it possible to selectively evaluate the effect of chemotherapy drugs in leukemic cells. In this study, we estimated the sensitivity of 9 frequently-used chemotherapeutic drugs on four types of leukemia, which may provide guidance for clinical leukemia chemotherapy. In addition, we found patients with any type of leukemia showed sensitive to teniposide, so teniposide might have a good prospect in the treatment of leukemia.

Note: Values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 4). Significance was determined by ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. **P<0.01, compared to the control.

Figure 1: Effect of a patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) to the 9 drugs in vitro.

Table 1: Sensitivity of leukemic cells to the 9 drugs in vitro.

References

Mini Review

In Vitro Chemosensitivity Assessed with MTT Assay in 100 Leukemic Patients

Zhi guo Zhang1, Jie Song1, Shuai Bai1 and Hua Yang*2

Author Affiliations

1Department of Pharmacy, the 960th Hospital of PLA, China

2Department of Immunology, Taishan Medical College, China

Received: February 19, 2019 | Published: February 26, 2019

Corresponding author: Hua Yang, Department of Immunology, Taishan Medical College, China

DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2019.15.002665

Also View In:

Abstract

Chemotherapy possesses an important position in the treatment course of cancer. Cellular drug resistance is supposed to play a major role in chemotherapy failure. The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility of the application of MTT assay in the in vitro chemosensitivity test, in attempt to supply theory reference for clinical therapy of leukemia. We obtained peripheral blood from 100 patients with leukemia at the time of initial diagnosis or relapse. Leukemic cells were separated and the chemosensitivity testing was performed by MTT colorimetric assay. The following drugs were tested: cytarabine, vincristine, methotrexate, daunorubicin, etoposide, teniposide, homoharringtonine, doxorubicin, and mitoxantrone. The Inhibition rates of each drug for four kinds of leukemia were analyzed.

Keywords: Chemosensitivity; Leukemia; Drug Resistance

Abbreviations: DNR: Daunorubicin; VP-16: Etoposide; Ara-C: Cytosine Arabinoside; VCR: Vincristine; HHT: Homoharringtonine; MIT: Mitoxantrone; DOX: Daunomycin; VM-26: Teniposide; MTX: Methotrexate. ALL: Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia; ANLL: Acute Non Lymphocytic Leukemia; CLL: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia; CML: Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia