Portal Vein Thrombosis in Surgical Ward- What to do: A Technical Review? Portal Vein Thrombosis in Surgical What to A Technical

and its diameter is approximately 1cm. It courses toward the porta hepatis in the free edge of the lesser omentum and receives the cystic, pyloric, accessory pancreatic, and superior pancreaticoduodenal veins, among other tributaries. Patients with PVT are characterized by a hyperdynamic circulation syndrome like that seen in cirrhosis. Liver enzymes and bilirubin are usually normal or only mildly elevated. Quantitative tests such as indocyan green clearance demonstrates overall slight functional decrease. Liver biopsy results are typically normal, but hemosiderosis associated with portosystemic shunting has Splenic and superior mesenteric veins together form the portal vein posterior to the pancreas. Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a significant clinicopathologic entity that all surgeons should be aware with. It has significant morbidity and mortality with 1% incidence in general population. The lifetime possibility of having portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is nearly 1%. PVT is being diagnosed more often as a result of the increasing usage of numerous advanced imaging modalities. Sonography, CT and magnetic resonance imaging are most used to diagnose PVT. Malignancy, inflammatory conditions of abdomen, trauma, surgery and hypercoagulable states are the most common risk factors causing PVT in surgical patients. PVT ultimately leads to the establishment of many collateral vessels nearby the thrombosed portal vein. First-line treatment for PVT is therapeutic anticoagulation-it helps prevent the spread of the thrombus. Other therapeutic preferences comprise surgery and interventional radiographic procedures.


Introduction
Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is an uncommon event happening with the obstruction or narrowing of the portal vein by a thrombus which is frequently related with the presence of an underlying liver disease or prothrombotic disorders. Portal vein thrombosis (PVT) is a significant clinicopathologic entity that all surgeons should be aware with. It has significant morbidity and mortality with 1% incidence in general population [1]. It can also follow mesenteric or splenic vein thrombosis. The preponderance of the blood supply to the liver is portal vein comprising up to 75% of it supplies. The risk factors for PVT are predominantly attributed to Virchow's triad -stasis of blood flow, endothelial injury, and hypercoagulability [2]. PVT occurs with numerous thrombophilic conditions with abdominal pathologies which can be either acute or chronic. PVT is being diagnosed more commonly due to the increasing practice of advanced sonography, computed tomography (CT). The stated lifetime risk of developing PVT in the overall population is roughly 1%. [3] Nevertheless, the prevalence may be as high as 30% in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. In addition, PVT is believed to be causative in nearly 8% of portal hypertension cases.

Surgical Anatomy
The portal vein forms posterior to the neck of the pancreas by the union of the splenic and superior mesenteric veins. It ranges from 5.5 to 8cm in length, and its diameter is approximately 1cm.
It courses toward the porta hepatis in the free edge of the lesser omentum and receives the cystic, pyloric, accessory pancreatic, and superior pancreaticoduodenal veins, among other tributaries.

Management of Portal Vein Thrombosis
Most patients with PVT are treated with immediate anticoagulation therapy. This is most often performed through continuous intravenous heparin infusion (Table 2), but some prefers using low-molecular-weight heparin. Chronic treatment options include warfarin or low-molecular-weight heparin.
Anticoagulation should be maintained for at least 6 months and may need to be continued beyond that period depending on the cause of thrombosis. Other more invasive treatment modalities used in the setting of PVT include trans jugular catheterization of occluded veins, local thrombolytic infusion directly into the area of thrombosis or into the superior mesenteric artery, the creation of a trans jugular portosystemic shunt, stent implantation, and mechanical thrombectomy [4]. The experience with interventional techniques in the setting of PVT is still limited, and the benefit of these procedures remains to be fully defined [5][6][7][8]. There are, however, an increasing number of case reports that document the successful use of interventional radiology for both mechanical and pharmacologic thrombolysis in the setting of PVT [5][6][7][8]. For example, the use of percutaneous transhepatic catheterization with mechanical and pharmacologic thrombolysis [7]. They recommend that mechanical thrombectomy be performed first followed by local pharmacologic thrombolysis to achieve enhanced dissolution of the thrombus. Surgical interventions such as thrombectomy or shunting are certainly more invasive and are associated with their own set of complications [8].

Discussion
Initially, PVT occurs as a complication of some liver pathology like cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma [3]. Now a day, it presents with several thrombophilic factors with local abdominal conditions. The main cause of PVT can be acquired or inherited. Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria [3].
The presentation of the symptoms may vary from acute to chronic, If it occurs less than 60 days then its acute and more than 60 days, it is chronic [10]. Sometimes acute conditions are asymptomatic, but usually it is presented with acute abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, hypotension and even death depending on the severity of it extend and its rapidity of the thrombus. If it is associated with superior mesenteric vein thrombus, it presents with mesenteric ischemia, haematochezia, fever, rebound tenderness, and ascites which is associated with a poor prognosis [11]. Acute PVT may undergo spontaneous resolution, or it may progress to chronic thrombosis. Chronic PVT may also be asymptomatic and can be incidental finding on imaging. But in chronic setting, it can present with symptoms of portal hypertension such as esophageal varices with bleeding, splenomegaly or hypersplenism, and ascites.

The abdominal ultrasound (US) is the investigation of choice for
PVT but more information can then be obtained through other imaging modalities like Doppler US, CT scan, magnetic resonance angiography and endoscopic ultrasound. Sonological findings usually include the presence of solid echoes within the portal vein and presence of a portal cavernoma [12]. But in our patient, the diagnosis was made by CT scan. CT scan can also be used to differentiate between recent and old thrombosis; the presence of portosystemic collaterals and cavernoma formation are both suggestive of old thrombosis [13]. The treatment for PVT is multifactorial; depending upon associated vessels involved and comorbidities, treatment options varies between conservative management to anticoagulation to thrombectomy and/or thrombolysis.

Asymptomatic cases with provoked PVT like post-abdominal
infections, post abdominal surgeries with minimal thrombus burden, or with partial non-obstructive PVT and not involving other venous segments except for portal vein and not awaiting liver transplantation, very high bleeding risk on anticoagulation or active bleeding not yet corrected other related short-term, poor prognosis co-morbidities or end-stage liver cirrhosis are all treated with Conservative management with no anticoagulation or interventions [14]. All Symptomatic cases with concomitant PVT with extension into mesenteric or splenic veins with non-reversible risk factors or persistent hypercoagulable states interval or increase in thrombus burden while not anticoagulated or waiting for liver transplantation were all treated with anti-coagulants [15] ( Table   2). All patients with Worsening abdominal pain with thrombus extension with failed anticoagulation therapy and impending intestinal necrosis and infarction from venous thrombosis seen with multiple splanchnic veins thrombus all treated with thrombectomy and/or thrombolysis and with worsening portal hypertension and its symptoms should be considered for Trans jugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS). For the patient with variceal bleeding the use of beta blockers can be considered as a prophylactic treatment and has successfully reduced the rate of the first variceal bleed and many studies have shown that variceal band ligation (VBL) is as effective as beta blockers [16,17].

Conclusion
PVT is an important entity that all surgeons should be familiar with. There are many associated risk factors for the development of PVT. In suspected cases, Doppler ultrasonography and/or CT imaging of the abdomen are the most effective diagnostic tool.
Anticoagulation is the principal method of treating this condition.
Interventional radiologic techniques, including mechanical thrombectomy, thrombolysis, and stenting, are becoming more popular. Open surgical approaches are often difficult and plagued by significant associated morbidity. Long-term prognosis of PVT is good in patients without underlying malignancy or cirrhosis.