Prospects of Neuroscientific Approaches to the Problem of Consciousness in the Situation of Growing Global Crisis of Our Terrestrial Civilization

Our consumer civilization is experiencing a global crisis that is steadily deepening, leading to degradation and destruction. This is constantly discussed. But on the part of the world’s political and economic leaders we do not see any decisive opposition. Negative processes deepen, covering not only ecological and various socioeconomic components of the global crisis, but already clearly demonstrate grave physical changes on our planet [1,2]. Now, more than ever before in the history of mankind, the preservation of faith in human dignity, in the altruistic potential of human nature is urgently needed. The issue of consciousness is a key point in overcoming the global crisis of terrestrial civilization. This is the problem of overcoming negative properties of consciousness such as irrepressible consumerism, aggressiveness and extreme egoism. They are rooted in human nature, and this determines their persistence, immutability at all stages of human history. They have a genetic basis, and this determines the extreme difficulties of changing them. Many doubt very much whether this is possible. But if we fail to do this, the fate of our civilization is deplorable. One thing is clear: this cannot be achieved by means of religion, ideology, upbringing and education alone. For this, new achievements of science and technology are needed. A significant role here belongs to neuroscience and related fields of scientific knowledge.


Introduction
Our consumer civilization is experiencing a global crisis that is steadily deepening, leading to degradation and destruction. This is constantly discussed. But on the part of the world's political and economic leaders we do not see any decisive opposition. Negative processes deepen, covering not only ecological and various socioeconomic components of the global crisis, but already clearly demonstrate grave physical changes on our planet [1,2]. Now, more than ever before in the history of mankind, the preservation of faith in human dignity, in the altruistic potential of human nature is urgently needed. The issue of consciousness is a key point in overcoming the global crisis of terrestrial civilization. This is the problem of overcoming negative properties of consciousness such as irrepressible consumerism, aggressiveness and extreme egoism. They are rooted in human nature, and this determines their persistence, immutability at all stages of human history. They have a genetic basis, and this determines the extreme difficulties of changing them. Many doubt very much whether this is possible.
But if we fail to do this, the fate of our civilization is deplorable. One thing is clear: this cannot be achieved by means of religion, ideology, upbringing and education alone. For this, new achievements of science and technology are needed. A significant role here belongs to neuroscience and related fields of scientific knowledge.
In recent decades, neuroscience has achieved significant results in the study of consciousness. They are associated, in particular with the use of methods for visualizing brain processes and the removal of signals from individual neurons, discovery and study of mirror neurons, the successful development of the trend called Brain-Reading, with the determination of clear neurodynamic correlates of many psychic phenomena that serve as a foundation for neurotechnologies in medicine and for other practical purposes.

Neuroscientific development of the problem of consciousness is
interdisciplinary. Neurophysiological studies are closely bond to the use of methods and results of many related disciplines such as psychology, psychiatry, psychophysiology, psychopharmacology, psychogenetics, neurosurgery, psychoneurology (the results of the latter are especially important for complex studies of the relation of various states of consciousness to the functioning of certain brain structures; in this respect especially indicative and valuable are the outstanding works of Ramachandran [3]. But very important part belongs, of course, to those disciplines of philosophical, psychological, phenomenological and humanitarian plan that describe consciousness -its meaningful dynamic forms, value-and- First of all, it is necessary to solve most difficult theoretical problem about the nature of the connection between the phenomena of consciousness and brain processes. The problem is that the phenomena of consciousness is described in terms of content, meaning, purpose, faith, will, while brain processes-in terms of the nerve substrate and pulse, mass, energy and spatial properties. These are two different description languages, and there are no direct logical connections between them. In analytical philosophy, they say there is a «gap in explanation» here. In order to relate these two types of descriptions, it is necessary to create a "conceptual bridge", i.e. to find or create such a theoretical system that would be logically relevant to each of the two different ways of describing and could link them in a single theoretical explanation. But in order to overcome the "gap in explanation", it is necessary to solve not only this epistemological problem, but also the main ontological problem of the relation between the events of subjective reality (to which physical properties cannot be attributed) and the brain processes (which necessarily possess these properties). This issue has always been a stumbling block for natural sciences. Meanwhile, subjective reality is a necessary and a specific property of consciousness, without it there is no consciousness.

Neuroscientific research and explanation of this quality compose
the essence of what many philosophers call the "Hard problem of consciousness". For more than 60 years it has been the focus of analytical philosophy. Despite the huge amount of publications (over one thousand books and many thousands of articles), no acceptable result has been achieved in its development. It was noted by both Western and Russian philosophers and representatives of neuroscience [4]. The proposed concepts were in general reductionist; thus the specificity of subjective reality was lost.
In fact, to solve this problem it is necessary to give a theoretically correct answer to one main question: how is mental, the phenomenon of subjective reality, connected with brain processes.
This will help to explain the mental causality, arbitrary action, the phenomenon of free will and a number of other difficult questions.
Trying to solve this problem, for many years I have been developing an informational approach based on the ideas of evolution and self-organization. The basic theses of the theory developed by me were expounded in my book many years ago [5]. The theory I proposed is different from the existing concepts of analytical philosophy. It relies on three initial premises from which answers to the main questions of the problem are logically derived. The first two premises are generally accepted scientific principles. The third premise is an intuitively acceptable agreement, well confirmed by ordinary (every-day) and scientific experience. I give them below: It is worth noting that information in biological and social systems allows not only a syntactic description, but also a semantic (meaningful) and pragmatic (target and value orientated, programmanagement based), which meets the typical requirements for describing the phenomena of subjective reality. Since this phenomenon of subjective reality (A) is information about this subject, it has its own specific bearer (let us designate it as X), which according to neuroscience is a certain brain neurodynamic system.
Thus, the phenomenon of subjective reality is necessarily connected with the corresponding brain process like any information and its bearer. Analysis shows that the relationship between A and X is not causal. This is a special kind of functional connection: A and X are simultaneous and based on one cause, they are in a relation of a one-to-one correspondence; X is the code representation of A (or, briefly, code of A). This kind of connection can be called a code dependence. It is formed in either phylogenesis or ontogenesis of a self-organizing system and is its functional element. A thorough investigation of the connection between A and X, of the structural and functional organization of systems X-type means of desiphering the brain code of this phenomenon subjective reality. This is a special cognitive task, including the hermeneutic aspect, the phenomenon of understanding information embodied in one or another bearer.
With relation to these statements have been provided:

Modern neuroscience has achieved significant success in deci-
phering the brain codes of subjective reality. For example, their result being a visual image experienced by a human is reproduced on a computer screen; brain neurodynamic correlates of many other psychic phenomena have been established [9][10][11][12]. "Brain reading", as one of the important areas of modern neuroscience, is developing successfully. Here, of course, a lot of debatable questions arise that concern the study of consciousness and require a thorough discussion. I would like to focus on the most important issue of these discussions -the question of the possibility of change the negative properties of consciousness. If the phenomenon of subjective reality and its neurodynamic bearer have the same cause, are simultaneous and are in one-to-one correspondence, that means that when I myself control this phenomenon of subjective reality -I am also controlling with my own will its neurodynamic bearer. Each of us has the ability to manage a certain class of his or her own brain neurodynamic systems, and at the same time manage the energy supply of these operations (the ability of mental self-determination).
And everyone does it all the time, often not very well.
This determines the ability to arbitrarily control not only mental and bodily movements but also certain vegetative processes aggressiveness and extreme egoism. We can assume that this is the main problem of consciousness of our age. The future of the human civilization depends on its solution.