info@biomedres.us   +1 (720) 414-3554
  One Westbrook Corporate Center, Suite 300, Westchester, IL 60154, USA

Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research

October, 2021; Volume 39, 3; pp 31313-31319

Research Article

Research Article

Use of Eichhornia Crassipes, Lemna sp and Salvinia Minima Plant Scrubbers in the Decontamination of Wastewater of Livestock Origin, in the Province of Imbabura

Zoila Karina Albuja Rivadeneira* and Álvaro Yépez Regalado

Author Affiliations

Vice Ministry of Rural Development Av. Eloy Alfaro N30-350 y Av, Ecuador

Received: October 05, 2021 | Published: October 18, 2021

Corresponding author: Zoila Karina Albuja Rivadeneira, Vice Ministry of Rural Development Av. Eloy Alfaro N30-350 y Av, Ecuador

DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2021.39.006297

ABSTRACT

A system of phytodepuration of wastewater of livestock origin was studied in the La Pradera farm, Imbabura Province, and its possibilities of use as irrigation water for the agricultural sector and plant material as a food source. Three plant species were used:
a) Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes),
b) Duckweed (Lemna sp.), and
c) Mouse ear (Salvinia minima)
The system prior to phytodepuration consisted of
1. A channel that conducts a flow of 3 L / s of residual water, and
2. A biodigester tank, whose effluent passes to the individual ponds of E. crassipes, Lenma sp. and S. minima and
3. A control of residual water treated by the biodigester without phyto-scrubber material. At the end of the plant growth process, which lasted four months, the following parameters were determined in the water remaining from the phytoremediation: electrical conductivity, cations and anions, hydrogen potential, sodium adsorption ratio, hardness, total dissolved solids, biochemical and chemical oxygen demand, and the ratio of carbohydrates, proteins and fats with respect to the weight of the vegetable mass. After the phytodepuration process, the degree of decrease of Ca2 +, Mg2 +, B3 +, CaCO3, K +, Cl-, HCO3 -, BOD5 and COD of the phytoremediators in the aqueous phase is observed in the following decreasing order: E. crassipes> Lemna sp. > S. minimum. The decrease of the parameters pH, electrical conductivity, Na +, SO4 2-, RAS, total dissolved solids decreased in decreasing order: E. crassipes> S. minima> Lemna sp. The decrease in P by phytoremediators goes in the following order: E. crassipes = Lemna sp. = S. minimum. Nitrates were also decreased in the following decreasing order: S. minima> E. crassipes = Lemna sp. Regarding food quality, protein storage was determined in the following increasing order: Lemna sp. < S. minima < E. crassipes. Phytoremediation is the most natural way of eliminating wastewater from the livestock sector, being able to reuse it in irrigation and the species that works best in this process is Eichhornia crassipes.

Keywords: Wastewater; Phytodepuration; Water Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes); Duckweed (Lemma sp); Mouse Ear (Salvinia minima); RAS; BOD5; COD; Protein

Introduction

Livestock activities are the basis of economic development at the rural level and constitute food sources for the urban sector. In Ecuador, the production of cattle and pigs has increased notably, so in the reports of the last National Agricultural Census of the year 2000, it is seen that with respect to the Census of 1976 the increase of these species has been 76, 80%, this has increased the economic movement, but has affected the good quality of the water resource, since contamination by livestock activity is frequent. However, if an adequate treatment of these wastes is carried out, the negative impact that is generated can be minimized and contribute positively to rural development with the obtaining of other benefits [5].
Several investigations have been carried out in the province of Imbabura, with optimal results. The use of phyto-scrubbers is encouraging as part of Environmental Management in caring for the water resource. In this way, knowing the potential for treating wastewater of the plant species Eichhornia crassipes and Lemna sp, they were used at La Pradera Farm to include them in a productive decontamination system, continuing with research to treat wastewater. Salvinia minima was also included due to its accelerated growth and because it is found abundantly in coexistence with Eichhornia crassipes; for this reason, it is considered important to be evaluated as a phyto-scrubber.

Methodology

In the research, which was carried out at La Pradera Farm, located in the province of Imbabura, Antonio Ante canton, San José de Chaltura parish, a biodigester, 12 mini ponds, 7.5 kg of Eichhornia crassipes, 1.5 kg of Lemna sp. and 3 kg Salvinia minima. The Completely Random Design was used, with four treatments and three repetitions. When finding a significant difference between treatments, the functional analysis was performed with the 5% Tukey test. The variables that were evaluated in the laboratory and the methods used were: pH (potentiometric), Conductivity (conductimetric), Hardness (volumetric), Total Solids (gravimetric), anions and cations (atomic absorption), BOD (APHA 5210B), COD (5520 D), total coliforms (EPA 40 CFR). Percentage of dry matter, protein and fat. The average flow was 3 L / s. The biodigester was built, located at the outlet of the effluent with wastewater, at the outlet of the biodigester a system of pipes led the water to the ponds 0.50 m wide x 1.00 m long and 0.30 m deep. depth, which contained the three investigated species.

Results Evaluation and Discussion

Table 1 Overall result of the evaluated variables and their reference parameters

Variables pH and Electrical Conductivity (ds / m)

Graph 1 Eichhornia crassipes, Lemna sp and Salvinia minima decrease the pH levels in the wastewater, Eichhornia crassipes lowers the pH levels by 24.05% with respect to the control, this makes the water reach the optimal levels to be used in irrigation with Regarding this parameter, Lemna sp and Salvinia minima also decrease the pH values by 16.53% and 1.15% respectively. These results are consistent with the research carried out by Valderrama (1996) [6], in which he states that E. crassipes stabilizes the pH and contributes to producing values closer to the neutrality of the water. Eichhornia crassipes with 65.11%, followed by Salvinia minima with 20.9%, and finally Lemna sp with 27.9% decrease the concentrations of electrical conductivity. Eichhornia crassipes absorbs a large number of metals present in the water, tending to decrease the conductivity parameters, with this, what is stated by Valderrama (2005) is corroborated.

Graph 1: Average values of pH and electrical conductivity of the evaluated treatments.

Variables Cations (Ca, Mg, Na, K)

Graph 2 Eichhornia crassipes reduces Ca concentrations by 33.3%, this phyto-scrubber is very easy to absorb this type of minerals due to its root and foliar structure, Lemna sp slightly decreases the calcium content of the water by 1.33%, but surprisingly Salvinia Minima contributes a greater amount of calcium to the water since it increased its concentration by 21.33%, probably due to the fact that this ion accumulates in its roots, the type of tangled roots that this species has and they save this mineral from the area collection at Lake San Pablo.

Eichhornia crassipes, decreases the concentration of Mg with respect to the wastewater of origin is 65.5%, Lemna sp and Salvinia minima also lower the levels of concentration of Mg by 22.8% and 18.71% respectively, this is evidenced in the absorption produced by these phytodepurative species. Eichhornia crassipes decreased the Na content in the water by 80.88%, Salvinia minima decreased by 61.1% and finally Lemna sp decreased by 53.1%, this confirms the research carried out by García et, in which it indicates that the aquatic species like E crassipes, they have a high affinity for adsorption and complexation with organic matter, cations and anions, assimilating them through the root. Eichhornia crassipes tends to decrease the amount of K significantly, the reduction percentage of it was 73.9%, Lemna sp and Salvinia minima also decreased this parameter, the percentage decreases were 65.2% and 45.4% respectively, with this it is verified what Valderrama (2005) [6] states in terms of the absorption of nutrients by aquatic macrophyte species is highly efficient in wastewater, being able to exceed 50% of their removal.

Graph 2: Average cation values of the evaluated treatments.

Variables Anions (HCO3, SO4, NO3, B, P, Cl)

Graph 3 Eichhronia crassipes achieved the highest percentage of HCO3 removal with 57.2%, followed by Lemna sp with a decrease of 21.4% and Salvinia minima had a reduction of this ion of 11.9%, this is consistent with Orozco, Saimonds (2006), who point out that floating macrophytes are capable of eliminating various substances and ions dissolved in water by adsorption and absorption. Eichhornia crassipes notably decreases the levels of SO4 in the wastewater, decreasing 98.7% of it, Salvinia minima decreasing by 38.5% and Lemna sp by 25%, the three phytodepurating species lower the levels of SO4 in a significant way. S. minima decreased the highest amount of NO3 with 59.7%, E. crassipes and Lemna sp did not decrease 50% of this anion. García (2012) [7] in his research states that nitrates are not eliminated by ion exchange due to their negative charge, rather they are transported as part of the residual water, being easily assimilated to new plant tissues and eliminated through the denitrification process by microorganisms present in the middle, which happened in the investigation although not significantly. Eichhornia crassipes significantly decreases the amount of B in the water, thus its decrease is 84.6%, Lemna sp and Salvinia minima also show a great decrease in 69.2% and 46.15% respectively, which shows that the phytodepurating species they highly absorb this nutrient.
Eichhornia crassipes, Salvinia minima and Lemna sp decreased 100% of the phosphorus present in the water. Rodríguez (2001) [8] in his study of Hydrology and Groundwater uses Eichhornia crassipes to reduce phosphorus levels, resulting in a 40-60% decrease, in this research these values were exceeded with the use of the three phyto-scrubbers. Eichhornia crassipes, Lemna sp and Salvinia minima decreased chlorine concentrations, the removal percentage was 4.2% for E. Crassipes and 3.6% for Lemna and S. minima respectively.

Graph 3: Average values of anions of the evaluated treatments.

Variables RAS, Hardness, Total Dissolved Solids

Graph 4 The Sodium Adsorption Ratio is decisive in the quality of the water, so that the waters that contain less than 1 are excellent for agriculture, from 1 to 2 are good waters, from 2 to 4 are considered regular waters, from 4 At 8 bad waters and more than 15 inappropriate waters, the values obtained through the phyto-scrubbers show the decrease of the RAS and as they fit into good evaluations, Eichhornia crassipes reached 0.91 RAS, making the water excellent, since it decreased 70.6% of This value, Lemna sp Salvinia minima and Lemna sp also lowered the RAS levels by 61.3% and 48.3% respectively. Eichhornia crassipes the best aquatic species to reduce the hardness of the water, with 54.2%, Lemna sp followed with a decrease of 15.3% and in the end the smallest decrease was had by Salvinia minima with 4.7%, E. crassipes is the only species plant that converts the average water hardness of the source water to soft, which makes this water more useful to be used in irrigation. Eichhornia crassipes decreased 80.2% of the amount of STD dissolved in wastewater, Salvinia minima had a reduction of 63.6% and Lemna sp decreased 54.2%, E. crassipes was the most effective species to decrease the amount of STD in water irrigation, this coincides with the research carried out by Valderrama (1996), in which he uses E. crassipes for the treatment of wastewater of agro-industrial origin and determines that this species is capable of eliminating more than 50% of STD of the water. Likewise, the percentages of decrease of E. crassipes coincide with those obtained by Camacho and Ordóñez (2008), who through their investigation of evaluation of recovery of wastewater systems with Eichhornia crassipes, determine that this species was able to decrease 83.69%.

Graph 4: Average values of Total Hardness of the evaluated treatments.

Variables BOD5, COD and Total Coliforms

Graph 5 Eichhornia crassipes decreased by 75% of BOD5, Lemna sp decreased by 52.5% and Salvinima minima decreased this value by 30%, the values obtained in this investigation agree with other investigations carried out, especially Eichhornia crassipes that has been more studied. that Obando (2006) [8] through his research, achieves reductions of 89.3% of BOD5 with Eichhornia crassipes, 76.6% through Salvinia minima and 70.7% with Lemna sp; Rodríguez (2006) [9] with Eichhornia crassipes decreases the concentration of BOD5 in a range of 80-90%. Camacho and Ordóñez (2008), in their research, found that E. crassipes was highly effective in reducing BOD5 values, decreasing 56.84%. With the chemical oxygen demand (COD) Eichhornia crassipes achieves the highest removal of the three species with 78%, followed by Lemna sp with 71.5% and Salvinia minima decreases in 65.3%. Eichhornia crassipes, Lemna sp and Salvinia minima, which decreased Total Coliform Colony Forming Units from 4000 to less than 10.

Graph 5: Average values of residual chlorine, nitrates and phosphates of the evaluated treatments.

Variable Percentage of Dry Matter, Protein and Fat

Graph 6 Eichhornia crassipes presented an accumulation of 9.42% of dry matter, 12.13% of protein and 1.14% of fat, being the species with the best bromatological characteristics in these principles, since Lemna sp weighed 9.36% of dry matter, 3.67% protein and 0.89% fat, finally Salvinia minima had 8.39% dry matter, 0.41% protein and 1% fat.

Graph 6: Values in percentage of dry matter, protein and fat of the phyto-scrubbers.

Conclusions and Future Work

With the use of the phytodepurators Eichhornia crassipes, Lemna sp and Salvinia minima, it was possible to reduce the concentrations of the evaluated parameters Ca, Mg, Na, K, HCO3, Cl, SO4, B, RAS, hardness, STD, BOD5, COD and Total coliforms, being able to reuse the residual water in irrigation. The best phytodepuration species is Eichhornia crassipes since it reduces the values of the essential parameters to determine the quality of irrigation water: pH, electrical conductivity, Ca, Mg, Na, K, HCO3, Cl, SO4, B, RAS, hardness, STD, BOD5, COD and total coliforms evaluated with greater efficiency, compared to the other phytodepurating species Lemna sp and Salvinia minima, it also has a better adaptation in the field and can be used as an additional feed source for the livestock of the farm (previous research), due to its nutritional properties and their acceptability, for this reason the Wastewater Productive Decontamination System of La Pradera Farm was implemented with this species [10-12].
This research is the preamble to many other investigations, since the efficiency of Eichhornia crassipes as a phyto-scrubber has been determined, but there are still many other parameters to be evaluated, and thus prove that phyto-scrubbers are excellent allies in the care and maintenance of the environment [13-60].

Thanks

To Ing. Álvaro Yépez, Director of this thesis, to Dr. Jacqueline Arroyo Opponent of the same, for her great help and selfless commitment towards carrying out this research, and to La Pradera Farm, in the person of Dr. Bolívar Batallas Dean of FICAYA of the Universidad Técnica del Norte, for having allowed and provided all the facilities for carrying out this research on its university campus.

Conflict of Interests

None.

References

    1. Miranda (2006) Points out that sewage or sewage is a combination of liquids and residues from domestic, agricultural or industrial activities, which, when not treated properly, cause contamination problems.
    2. Arroyo (2005) Mention that macrophytes have the ability to purify water through the direct assimilation of nutrients, especially nitrogen and phosphorus, which are removed from the medium and incorporated into plant tissue.
    3. Romero (2009) Mention that the water that comes out of the phytodepuration process contains a low organic load and a lower concentration of nutrients, so it can be added to a receiving body (stream, river, lake, or sea) without causing effects. harmful to wildlife.
    4. Clostre (2007) Points out that the range of species that are used in phytodepuration is rather reduced, and in general it is restricted to typically helophyte species.
    5. Uneabasto (2013) Tratamiento de aguas residuales. Catorce 6: 45.
    6. Valderrama L (2005) Las plantas acuáticas una alternativa para el tratamiento de aguas residuales. Bogotá.
    7. García J (2012) Comparación y Evaluación de Tres Plantas Acuáticas para Determinar la Eficiencia de Remoción de Nutrientes en el Tratamiento de Aguas Residuales. Comparación y Evaluación de Tres Plantas Acuáticas para Determinar la Eficiencia de Remoción de Nutrientes en el Tratamiento de Aguas Residuales. Lima, Perú.
    8. Obando J (2006) Determination of Eichhornia crassipes as a pond scrubber. University of the Valley. Faculty of Chemical Engineering.
    9. Rodríguez C (2001) Acción depuradora de algunas plantas acuáticas sobre las aguas residuales. Cuba.
    10. Coral J (2002) Treatment of domestic wastewater by cultivating duckweed (Lemna sp.) In the San Pablo lake basin. Thesis Ing. RNR. Ibarra Ecuador, Technical University of the North.
    11. León M, Lucero A (2009) Study of Eichhornia crassipes, Lemna gibba and Azolla filiculoides in the biological treatment of domestic wastewater in community and single-family systems of the Cotacachi canton.
    12. Abad S (2009) Study of the Use of the lechuguín Eichhornia crassipes of the Reservoir of the Daniel Palacios dam. University of Cuenca.
    13. Álvarez J (2012) Gestión de Aguas Residuales en el Ámbito Rural en Galicia. Scieli 21.
    14. Barbara G (2000) Fitodepuración para Aguas Residuales. Massachusetts.
    15. Bejarano R (2006) Lenteja de agua para el tratamiento de aguas residuales. Colombia.
    16. Benítez R (2014) Evaluación de la cinética de la acumulación de Cromo en el buchón de agua. Bio. Agro.
    17. Bracamonte CM (2002) Plantas acuáticas de las lagunas y humedales en Castilla. España: La Mancha.
    18. Bres PC (2012) Capacidad de las macrófitas Lemna minor y Eichhornia crassipes para eliminar ní RIA.
    19. Brix HA (2001) Media selection for sustainable phosphorus removal in subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Sci. Technol: 47-54.
    20. Castro MF (1993) Evaluación de riesgos para la salud por el uso de aguas residuales con plantas acuá Panama.
    21. Celis J (2005) Recientes aplicaciones de la depuración de aguas residuales con plantas acuá Chile: Bio.
    22. Chara JP (2007) Evaluación de un sistema de biodigestión en serie para clima frí Scielo 60.
    23. Cooper J (1999) A review of the desing and performance of vertical flow and hybriud reed bed treatment systems. Sci. Technol 40.
    24. Consejo Nacional De Rrhh (2002) Norma de la Calidad Ambiental y Descarga de Efluentes del Ecuador. Reglamento para la prevención y control de la contaminación ambiental, en lo relativo al recurso agua.
    25. Constitución De La República Del Ecuador (2008) Derechos del Buen Vivir.
    26. Curt MD (2012) Macrófitas de intererés en fitodepuració Scielo 105.
    27. Dávila M (2005). Aprovechamiento del helecho de agua (Azolla sp.) para mejoramiento de tratamiento secundario de aguas residuales domé Ibarra, Imbabura, Ecuador.
    28. Delgadillo MC (2010) Planta de tratamiento de aguas residuales con macró Journal 21.
    29. Departamento de Gestión Ambiental del Municipio de Otavalo (2001) Tratamiento de Agua Residual afluente al Lago San Pablo con Lemna sp. Documento disponible en la Dirección de Gestión Ambiental del Ilustre Municipio de Otavalo.
    30. Faulkner SR (1989) Physical and chemical characteristic of freshwater wetlands soils. Journal of Lewis 805.
    31. Fernández J (2005) Filtros de macrófitas en flotació España: UPV.
    32. Ferrer JS (2006) Tratmiento biológico de aguas residuales. Valencia: UPV.
    33. FIDA F y (2006) El agua para la alimentación, la agricultura y los medios de vida rurales. Larga Sombra del Ganado 47.
    34. García JR (1997) Fitodepuración con macró Scielo 65.
    35. Gonzáles JD (2000) Plantas acuáticas para el tratamiento de especies ornametales. Mexico.
    36. Gopal B (1999) Natural and constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: potentials and problems. Journal of Water Sci.
    37. Gunkel G (2004) Las macrófitas de algunos lagos andinos en el Ecuador. Scielo 52.
    38. Gurrola NC (2013) Congreso Nacional de Ciencias Ambientales. Int Contm Ambie pp. 443.
    39. Hernández A (1997) Saneamiento y Alcantarrillado. España: Mundi- Prensa.
    40. International TA (2014) Organización a la defensa de los animales. Iberoamerica.
    41. Lara JH (2003) Reutilización de aguas residuales, aprovechamiento de nutrientes en riego agrí Scielo 242.
    42. Martelo JL (2012) Macrófitas flotantes en el tratamiento de aguas residuales. World Guide Science.
    43. Mays LF (2004) Tratamiento de humedales. Agronómica del Oriente.
    44. Medeiros SS (2005) Utilización de agua residual de origen doméstico en la agricultura. Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental.
    45. Mena M (2004) Diagnóstico de aguas residuales y prediseño de una planta de tratamiento biológico para la parroquia de Gonzáles Suá Diagnóstico de aguas residuales y prediseño de una planta de tratamiento biológico para la parroquia de Gonzáles Suárez. Otavalo, Imbabura, Ecuador.
    46. Moya C (2008) Colecciones Bioló México: Limusa.
    47. Nimukunda F (2011) Manual Para la Descripción y el Mantenimiento del Sistema De Descontaminación Productiva de las Aguas Residuales Provenientes de Las Actividades Pecuarias. Tierra
    48. (2003) ONU. Desarrollo del Agua. Conferencia a nivel mundial.
    49. Ramalho R (2003) Tratamiento de aguas residuales. En R. Ramalho, Tratamiento de aguas residuales (p 697). Buenos Aires: Reverté.
    50. Robles W (2009) Biology and Control of Acuatic Plants. Puerto Rico.
    51. Rodien BY (1987) Ingenieria Sanitaria. Mexico: Continental.
    52. Rodríguez R (1995) Flora de Chile. Chile: Univ. Concepció
    53. Rodríguez RA (2009) Helechos Nativos del Centro y Sur de Chile. Chile: Corporacion Chilena de Madera.
    54. Sánchez G (2006) Muestreo de aguas residuales e industriales. Universidad Gran Mariscal de Ayacucho. Maturín-Venezuela p. 35.
    55. Silva JT (2008) Reuso de aguas residuales domésticas en la agricultura. Journal of Redalyc pp. 359.
    56. Sorrequieta A (2004) Aguas Residuales, Reuso y Tratamiento. Argentina.
    57. (2000) UNICEF Política de Abastecimiento y Saneamiento del Agua.
    58. (1997) Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. II Curso sobre reutilización de aguas residuales y salinas en regadí Aplicación de tecnologías avanzadas. UPM. Madrid.
    59. Vollenweider R (1968) Scientifical fundamentals of eutrophication of lakes and flowing in eutrophication. Paris: Coop and Dev.
    60. Zamora FR (2009) Uso de agua residual y contenido de materia orgánica y biomasa en Venezuela. ScIelo 35(2).
Research Article

Use of Eichhornia Crassipes, Lemna sp and Salvinia Minima Plant Scrubbers in the Decontamination of Wastewater of Livestock Origin, in the Province of Imbabura

Zoila Karina Albuja Rivadeneira* and Álvaro Yépez Regalado

Author Affiliations

Vice Ministry of Rural Development Av. Eloy Alfaro N30-350 y Av, Ecuador

Received: October 05, 2021 | Published: October 18, 2021

Corresponding author: Zoila Karina Albuja Rivadeneira, Vice Ministry of Rural Development Av. Eloy Alfaro N30-350 y Av, Ecuador

DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2021.39.006297

ABSTRACT

A system of phytodepuration of wastewater of livestock origin was studied in the La Pradera farm, Imbabura Province, and its possibilities of use as irrigation water for the agricultural sector and plant material as a food source. Three plant species were used:
a) Water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes),
b) Duckweed (Lemna sp.), and
c) Mouse ear (Salvinia minima)
The system prior to phytodepuration consisted of
1. A channel that conducts a flow of 3 L / s of residual water, and
2. A biodigester tank, whose effluent passes to the individual ponds of E. crassipes, Lenma sp. and S. minima and
3. A control of residual water treated by the biodigester without phyto-scrubber material. At the end of the plant growth process, which lasted four months, the following parameters were determined in the water remaining from the phytoremediation: electrical conductivity, cations and anions, hydrogen potential, sodium adsorption ratio, hardness, total dissolved solids, biochemical and chemical oxygen demand, and the ratio of carbohydrates, proteins and fats with respect to the weight of the vegetable mass. After the phytodepuration process, the degree of decrease of Ca2 +, Mg2 +, B3 +, CaCO3, K +, Cl-, HCO3 -, BOD5 and COD of the phytoremediators in the aqueous phase is observed in the following decreasing order: E. crassipes> Lemna sp. > S. minimum. The decrease of the parameters pH, electrical conductivity, Na +, SO4 2-, RAS, total dissolved solids decreased in decreasing order: E. crassipes> S. minima> Lemna sp. The decrease in P by phytoremediators goes in the following order: E. crassipes = Lemna sp. = S. minimum. Nitrates were also decreased in the following decreasing order: S. minima> E. crassipes = Lemna sp. Regarding food quality, protein storage was determined in the following increasing order: Lemna sp. < S. minima < E. crassipes. Phytoremediation is the most natural way of eliminating wastewater from the livestock sector, being able to reuse it in irrigation and the species that works best in this process is Eichhornia crassipes.

Keywords: Wastewater; Phytodepuration; Water Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes); Duckweed (Lemma sp); Mouse Ear (Salvinia minima); RAS; BOD5; COD; Protein

DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2021.39.006297